Box Cutters and Suspicious Notes Found in Plane Lavatories

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY

Your argument assumes that the Iraq money would be spent on XXX instead of Iraq. This is just plain wrong. The current Iraq spending has nothing to do with budgeted items of yesteryear. This "spend it here" instead of there argument was deemed a strawman before....especially since all this "deficit spending" whining has come about. How do you rectify your deficit rantings?

Come on BOBDN - don't be a Clinton - tell the truth

CkG

If the Bush administration can justify spending hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq to fix what their lies have caused they can spend the money needed here at home to fund airline and homeland security.

I'd like to see them explain to the American people why they can throw away money due to the lies they told us in Iraq but not for our safety here at home.

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Who approved the legislation for the invasion of Iraq?

 

[glugglug]

Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I think everyone needs to relax a little bit. Do you really think terrorists are going to try and do the EXACT SAME THING they did before? It didn't even work on September 11 once the people on the White House bound plane figured out what was going on. Relax. Stop locking the barn door after the chickens have already gotten out.

Ironically, by stopping that white-house bound plane those victims did great harm to this country. If the terrorists had "succeeded", the largest threat to security both in the U.S. and abroad (dubya) would have been eliminated.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Yet without congressional approval, the war never would have happened.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Yet without congressional approval, the war never would have happened.

Yet without Bush lying to Congress he would never have received approval.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Yet without congressional approval, the war never would have happened.

Yet without Bush lying to Congress he would never have received approval.

Speaks very poorly of congress to be duped by a person too dumb to be in office(according to folks like yourself)

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Yet without congressional approval, the war never would have happened.

Yet without Bush lying to Congress he would never have received approval.

Speaks very poorly of congress to be duped by a person too dumb to be in office(according to folks like yourself)

Speaks very poorly of you to support him.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Oh no worries mate. We don't take any of yours either.

Back on topic:

I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

Well, let's see here:

The House voted on the $87 Billion measure 303-125. It also passed 87-12 in the Senate. Isn't the purpose of Congress to approve legislation?

Legislation made necessary by the Bush administration's unnecessary invasion of Iraq which they sold to the American people based on a pack of lies.

Yet without congressional approval, the war never would have happened.

Yet without Bush lying to Congress he would never have received approval.

Speaks very poorly of congress to be duped by a person too dumb to be in office(according to folks like yourself)

Speaks very poorly of you to support him.

looking for a subject change?

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: glugglug

Originally posted by: tnitsuj
I think everyone needs to relax a little bit. Do you really think terrorists are going to try and do the EXACT SAME THING they did before? It didn't even work on September 11 once the people on the White House bound plane figured out what was going on. Relax. Stop locking the barn door after the chickens have already gotten out.

Ironically, by stopping that white-house bound plane those victims did great harm to this country. If the terrorists had "succeeded", the largest threat to security both in the U.S. and abroad (dubya) would have been eliminated.

In blowing up his house? Too bad he was in Floriduh at the time.

I just love the brilliance of the left sometimes. Facts? What use are those in forming an opinion?

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

<british accent>Incorrect answer, old chap.</british accent>

You changed the subject with:

For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

I got us back on topic.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

And I'll be dipped in sh!t if you didn't change the subject again.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

Actually i think you had already broken ranks with the current subject.



But on the subject of box cutters, I dont see how you can stop those from being taken onto airplane short of full strip search and 100% baggage inspection.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

<british accent>Incorrect answer, old chap.</british accent>

You changed the subject with:

For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

I got us back on topic.

I'll tell you what's "very interesting."

That you would try to place responsibility for Bush's mess with Congress.

Do you find Bush's request for $87 billion interesting as well?

And I'll be dipped in sh!t if you didn't change the subject again.

As is this reply all the above replies were in response to off subject replies.

Round and round and round.

Stay on subject and I won't have to reply to your off subject posts.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

Actually i think you had already broken ranks with the current subject.



But on the subject of box cutters, I dont see how you can stop those from being taken onto airplane short of full strip search and 100% baggage inspection.

Fully fund airport security. Install metal detectors. Unless someone invents a plastic box cutter the metal detector will detect the metal box cutters.

Also secure airliners on the tarmack and have security on the planes with support crews who have opportunities to place weapons if left alone on aircraft.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: BOBDN

Originally posted by: charrison

looking for a subject change?

Nope. We can discuss the fact that weapons are being brought onto commercial airliners and people are leaving weapons in commercial airliner lavatories for months wihtout detection.

But I don't think you want to discuss that. You changed the subject.

Actually i think you had already broken ranks with the current subject.



But on the subject of box cutters, I dont see how you can stop those from being taken onto airplane short of full strip search and 100% baggage inspection.

Fully fund airport security. Install metal detectors. Unless someone invents a plastic box cutter the metal detector will detect the metal box cutters.

Also secure airliners on the tarmack and have security on the planes with support crews who have opportunities to place weapons if left alone on aircraft.

They do have plastic box cutters.


You would only need to hide a razer blade in your carry on luggage. Given the size of the blade(thickness), i think it would be fairly easy to get it past the x-ray machines.

 

[burnedout]

Originally posted by: BOBDN

As is this reply all the above replies were in response to off subject replies.

Round and round and round.

Stay on subject and I won't have to reply to your off subject posts.

So how in the hell was my ON TOPIC POST off the subject?

To wit:

"I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting."

And what was the response? Another one of your cognitively dissonant strawmen?

No, sorry Bob. YOU continue changing the subject.

Now, back to the topic at hand...... I wonder why all those Republican and Democratic congressmen approved this bill then?

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Why wasn't I on the list? I feel left out...

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Why wasn't I on the list? I feel left out...

He thinks you're part of the "conspiracy"

And where is the other member of their little conspiracy?

Just, as usual, not willing to spend any effort to research his "facts". Much easier to stake a claim and move along to the next post.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Why wasn't I on the list? I feel left out...

You're too nice. And you're not part of the conspiracy.

Send them a PM. Maybe they'll let you join. But I can't for the life of me understand why you'd want to.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: BOBDN
For CkG, alchemize and burnedout.

I don't take any of your bullsh!t. You attack me I respond in kind.

You have a problem with that go boo hoo hoo to the mods you wussies.

Why wasn't I on the list? I feel left out...

He thinks you're part of the "conspiracy"

And where is the other member of their little conspiracy?

Just, as usual, not willing to spend any effort to research his "facts". Much easier to stake a claim and move along to the next post.

Oh buddy, I know the facts. And I'm loving every minute of it.

 

[BOBDN]

Originally posted by: burnedout

Originally posted by: BOBDN

As is this reply all the above replies were in response to off subject replies.

Round and round and round.

Stay on subject and I won't have to reply to your off subject posts.

So how in the hell was my ON TOPIC POST off the subject?

To wit:

"I wonder how many Democrat Senators voted for the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill

Very interesting."

And what was the response? Another one of your cognitively dissonant strawmen?

No, sorry Bob. YOU continue changing the subject.

Now, back to the topic at hand...... I wonder why all those Republican and Democratic congressmen approved this bill then?

It's cognitive DISSIDENCE. If you're going to use my phrases please use them properly.

As for the subject of this thread, it's the fact that people are able to bring contraband onboard commercial airliners over two years
after September 11.

IMO due to the Bush administration's lack of funding due in part to their record budget deficit and more so their waste of hundreds of billions of dollars on their unnecessary, illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq.

Hundreds of billions for Iraq. Nothing for security in the USA. What a disgrace.