- Dec 28, 2000
- 1,892
- 1
- 71
"There was no direct way to prevent the Boston murders."
Of course there was
Noam Chomsky is only still famous because of his name. If his name was Al Smith he would be just another forgotten hate America firster who would never dream of living somewhere else. The only question now is who is uglier Choam Nomsky or Jabba the Hutt?
Rather, the full force of the U.S. killing machine might have been used to extricate them, quite possibly leading to nuclear war.
We're talking about people who rally in the tens of thousands in support of blasphemy laws; they hate us simply because we are not Islamic. Absolutely nothing we do will make them not hate us anymore.
Not sanctioning them and bombing the shit out of them might be a start.
I see Nebor has no issue with acts of war, sans declaration of war. Nor are you making any distinction for people generically hating us, VS those whose families we have used as collateral in our drone strikes.
You need to appreciate the difference it makes when it is personal revenge.
Not sanctioning them and bombing the shit out of them might be a start.
No commentary, lock it.
Ok Nebor, answer this question real quick. What are the goals and objectives of the war on terror and what are the milestones for victory.
I'd also like your insight as to the history of islamic terrorism in this country and what it stems from but you don't really have to answer that question as I know the answer.
Noam Chomsky is an idiot but he is right on this issue. The reason they hate us is because the US government is invading their countries and killing their children. Many innocent civilians and children have been killed by drone strikes and this is a perfect way for terrorists to recruit the parents of dead children.
You realize that the US is invading their countries and killing their children because they already hated the US, right? And they were actively working to harm Americans and American interests.
That helps to explain the lack of US drone strikes in Iceland, Japan and South Africa.
To continuously degrade existing and emergent terror networks in order to keep them from threatening US interests at home and abroad. There is no victory, only vigilance. As global economic inequity continues to rise, and the world is made "smaller" by easy air travel and telecommunications, we'll see increased threats against America and our interests across the world. By tracking new anti-America groups from the outset, crippling them early on via arrests made by foreign security forces and drone strikes we keep them from amassing the resources necessary to threaten us and create a deterrent effect.
Islamic terrorism in our country is the result of allowing muslims to immigrate here. They naturally congregate together, get most of their information and guidance from their mosques and rarely "integrate" into Western society. They view us as weak, liberal heathens whose time of reckoning just hasn't come yet. It's really not complicated. Those who aren't actively supporting terrorism are tacitly approving of it, since war made by Muslims against non-Muslims is always appropriate.
I highly recommend you read the Control Factor. It's a psychology book that addresses why most people react to Islam the way they do: because it's the easiest thing to do. We don't want to come to terms with the fact that we're facing a threat unlike any we've ever seen before, a people that won't be pacified or quelled under any circumstance.
Exactly, I've got a great solution: Don't import people from places that hate us and pay them to hate us here at home.
"If we are so good, why someone should hate us?"
It's actually Noam Chomsky's words...
Think about:
"If we are so good, why someone should hate us?"
"If we are so good, why someone should hate us?"
It's actually Noam Chomsky's words...
Think about:
"If we are so good, why someone should hate us?"