Bone-in Ribeye steak $5/lb or Boneless ribeye $6/lb

[JEDI]

Package of Bone-in ribeye @$5/lb contains TWO 1lb ribeyes.

for the bone-in ribeye, i have 2 bones which i have no use for. plus it's easier to eat w/o the bone.

Thus I think the boneless ribeye is a better value.

 

[Ns1]

bone-in for taste

 

[SunnyD]

Depends - are you cooking?

 

[Chronoshock]

Aside from the meat weight/$ ratio, there's also flavor to consider. Some people like the meat around the bone, and if that's your thing go for the bone-in

 

[Tiamat]

If you are lazy, get boneless. In my limited exposure to Bone-In rib-eye, I felt it had a slightly more robust flavor. Although, this could have been due to many other factors such as quality of cut, marbleization, etc.

 

[LS21]

im too lazy to cut around the bones

 

[KK]

Originally posted by: LS21
im too lazy to cut around the bones

Me too. I don't want to slow down gobbling down the steak because of a bone. Plus what if that bone gets stuck in my throat, that'd be a bitch.

 

[Funyuns101]

bone-in for taste; boneless for ease.
bones can weigh a bunch though, so you get more meat for your money in the boneless

 

[FoBoT]

no bone
unless you are a dog and will eat the bone

 

[LongCoolMother]

bone in for the best flavor. bone-less for convenience. I'd take the boneless, but either one is good.

 

[waggy]

BONE-IN!


by far the best steak ever (well one of the best). i always get the bone-in whenever i can.

 

[SSSnail]

Depends: is said steak on treadmill and are you looking to buy bulk? Depends on the weight ratio of bone to meat and amount purchase (bulk), we're missing a few variables here.

ATOT = fail.