Boehner proposes leaving 52 Million Americans without insurance.

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Its his fault. The point is do you let him DIE because of it? Or will he get treated get well and have 600k+ in debt and file for bankruptcy. That is our system now. How we think THAT works is beyond me.

I think the real question for this situation, is why we think catastrophic insurance is unaffordable? Inexpensive insurance would have easily made this a non issue.
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
I think the real question for this situation, is why we think catastrophic insurance is unaffordable? Inexpensive insurance would have easily made this a non issue.

exactly but in the real world people wont buy the coverage. So the question is what do you do about that? Do you have everyone else pay (what we do now) or force them to buy some kind of coverage (obama) or let them die. Crack that nut and you could be a millionaire.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Many people i work with can afford health insurance and elect not to take it. That's a personal choice that they make.

Yes, and when they get hit with huge medical bills many default and saddle everyone else with picking up the tab. It's a personal choice the rest of us often end up paying for.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
exactly but in the real world people wont buy the coverage. So the question is what do you do about that? Do you have everyone else pay (what we do now) or force them to buy some kind of coverage (obama) or let them die. Crack that nut and you could be a millionaire.

The largest problem in my opinion is the social conditioning that medical insurance is expensive. And couple that with the fact that insurance is more often than not linked to employment and situation gets worse. People should carry their own catastrophic policy so they are still covered even when not employed.

We need to get away from employer sponsored health insurance and we need to buy health insurance just like we buy any other kind of insurance.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
...And there's also many people who genuinely can't afford it.

According to Kaiser there are about 10million people that are chronically uninsured. That amounts to about 3% of the population. Do we turn everything upside down for 97% of the population to fix something for 3% of the population?
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
The largest problem in my opinion is the social conditioning that medical insurance is expensive. And couple that with the fact that insurance is more often than not linked to employment and situation gets worse. People should carry their own catastrophic policy so they are still covered even when not employed.

We need to get away from employer sponsored health insurance and we need to buy health insurance just like we buy any other kind of insurance.

I agree people should but if you arent going to force them they wont. So what do you do?
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Boner can pass whatever he wants.

VETO
 

dawp

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
11,347
2,710
136
The largest problem in my opinion is the social conditioning that medical insurance is expensive. And couple that with the fact that insurance is more often than not linked to employment and situation gets worse. People should carry their own catastrophic policy so they are still covered even when not employed.

We need to get away from employer sponsored health insurance and we need to buy health insurance just like we buy any other kind of insurance.


Slight hole in you plan there. What do you think is going to get dropped first, rent or the insurance? Non-essential expenses for living and insurance of any type will be one of those.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
I think Boehner is going to talk the standard Republican rhetoric but end up cooperating more than obstructing. He's a glory hound and he'll want his name on some signed legislation as SotH. The trick is going to be getting the rest of the House to go along. I expect McConnell to remain a perpetual dick, especially given his post-election comments.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
No, we need to get rid of Government, and it's influence on insurance, and otherwise, everyday life.

-John
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
No, we need to get rid of insurance completely so it quits fucking up the system.

By and large we dont use insurance right now. Most people in this country have a health care plan, not health insurance. We use our "insurance" for everything, including the stuff that is expected and stuff we can afford.

Putting a middle man(govt or insurance) in every healthcare transaction will only make prices go up.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Insurance, Lloyd's of London, etc. was established without Government intervention.

That Government is now the owner of insurance, only shows how profitable it is, and how powerful Government is.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Health Care plan, is obviously insurance.

An individual makes a health care plan, a group makes insurance.

-John
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
No, we need to get rid of Government, and it's influence on insurance, and otherwise, everyday life.

-John

Since that would be impossible, and has never existed in the history of humanity, your desires are moot. What you're asking for is every man for themselves total anarchy, since that's the only thing that can exist without government.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Insurance can exist without Government.

Government saw how profitable it was, and now they want to own it.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
FYI, Government could probably never exist, but for Insurance.

An early form of collectivism.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Insurance, is one of the basic tenents of life, and that is why Governments take over of health-care is so scary. They are taking over one of the basic premises of life, and charging us for "insurance."

-John
 

MooseNSquirrel

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2009
2,587
318
126
Except health care isn't insurance.

And I think Galbraith would have a thing or 2 to say about insurance existing without Government :)
 

MooseNSquirrel

Platinum Member
Feb 26, 2009
2,587
318
126
Really? Show me. In the context of what would truly be health care reform, what has been done to make it better? What in the current bill makes a physician better able to diagnose and treat? What gives him more time per patient to get a better initial workup?

No single payer system in the world has as much bureaucracy as ours. Numerous studies out there are to be found in this wonderful thing called the internet.

Its pretty well documented.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
I think the real question for this situation, is why we think catastrophic insurance is unaffordable? Inexpensive insurance would have easily made this a non issue.

You make a good point. The problem with employer based insurance is, it IS more expensive. For example, between myself and my employer, my insurance and dental run about $6700/year. For that price, even being a diabetic, I could buy a catastrphic policy AND conceierge medical for half of that.