Blix interview: No WMD's in Iraq!

DaFinn

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
4,725
0
0
Hans blix says in an interview given to Der Tagesspiegel in Germany, that he beleives there are no WMD
's in Iraq. He also says WMD's were the US justification for this war, and based on this the war was unjustified!

Link in German


Well... have they found any WMD's yet?
rolleye.gif
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,915
6,792
126
Die Hauptrechtfertigung für den Krieg waren Massenvernichtungswaffen, und es mag sich herausstellen, dass in dieser Hinsicht der Krieg nicht gerechtfertigt war.
----------
Mein Gott, das ist nicht gut.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
arg, vildi að ég hefði lært þýsku betur í skóla, tvö ár í einum skóla, hálf önn í öðrum, og sammt kann ég ekki rassgat í þýsku
 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

No we don't. The UN does. It didn't give him any help in finding WMD so he was resigned to being lead around by Saddam and his cronies.

CkG

LOL!!! :D
 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

No we don't. The UN does. It didn't give him any help in finding WMD so he was resigned to being lead around by Saddam and his cronies.

CkG

LOL!!! :D

What seems to be so funny? I fail to see how failed inspections are funny:disgust:

CkG

I don't really recall people in January slamming the UN for not helping Blix. Why does the UN owe Blix an apology?
Also, isn't saying its the UNs fault that Blix didn't find any WMDs when there are no WMDs to be found a bit odd?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

No we don't. The UN does. It didn't give him any help in finding WMD so he was resigned to being lead around by Saddam and his cronies.

CkG

LOL!!! :D

What seems to be so funny? I fail to see how failed inspections are funny:disgust:

CkG

I don't really recall people in January slamming the UN for not helping Blix. Why does the UN owe Blix an apology?
Also, isn't saying its the UNs fault that Blix didn't find any WMDs when there are no WMDs to be found a bit odd?

1. - BS, there was plenty of blame heaped on the UN.
2. - They didn't give him the tools, authority, security he needed to thouroughly and effectively search.
3. - No, I never said they owe him an apology for not actually finding the WMD - you put the "finding" stipulation on it. See #2;) If Blix had the freedom to search anywhere in Iraq without harassment from Saddam and still didn't find anything then there wouldn't have been a war;) But he wasn't able to search everywhere whenever he wanted. Saddam admitted to having such things and everyone in the UN agreed he had them at one time. So tell me where the oddity is now?

We've been over this a hundred time in this forum - and it's obvious some people just can't seem to get over their hatred of the US and Bush.

CkG
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,915
6,792
126
We've been over this a hundred time in this forum - and it's obvious some people just can't seem to get over their hatred of the US and Bush.
--------------------------
What's obvious is that the Bush sheep have got bushels of wool pulled over their eyes. Bush is a disaster.
 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

Well.... do we... really?
What do you call all those Infantry Divisions amassed over there and the Armada off the coast?
Weapons of semi particular interest don't seem to do it for me.... nope... Blix is wrong.. I know where the WMD are... and they are us. it's no wonder he couldn't find them.. he looked in the wrong place...

 

jahawkin

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2000
1,355
0
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

No we don't. The UN does. It didn't give him any help in finding WMD so he was resigned to being lead around by Saddam and his cronies.

CkG

LOL!!! :D

What seems to be so funny? I fail to see how failed inspections are funny:disgust:

CkG

I don't really recall people in January slamming the UN for not helping Blix. Why does the UN owe Blix an apology?
Also, isn't saying its the UNs fault that Blix didn't find any WMDs when there are no WMDs to be found a bit odd?

1. - BS, there was plenty of blame heaped on the UN.
2. - They didn't give him the tools, authority, security he needed to thouroughly and effectively search.
3. - No, I never said they owe him an apology for not actually finding the WMD - you put the "finding" stipulation on it. See #2;) If Blix had the freedom to search anywhere in Iraq without harassment from Saddam and still didn't find anything then there wouldn't have been a war;) But he wasn't able to search everywhere whenever he wanted. Saddam admitted to having such things and everyone in the UN agreed he had them at one time. So tell me where the oddity is now?

We've been over this a hundred time in this forum - and it's obvious some people just can't seem to get over their hatred of the US and Bush.

CkG

Blix had full access. What sites was he deneyed access to inspect? Saddam was doing some shady stuff as usual (can't fully interview scientists), but Blix could inspect whatever he wanted to.
So let me get this straight:
The UN is to blame because the inspections process was cut short bacause we couldn't wait any longer because Saddam was a direct threat to us with all his WMDs (the legality of the war was based on this reasoning). Now that we find that there were no WMDs to begin with(as of yet), the UN needs to apologize to Blix for not giving hime the tools, authority, and security to find the non-existent WMDs?? That's some twisted logic there.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: jahawkin
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We owe Blix a huge apology.

No we don't. The UN does. It didn't give him any help in finding WMD so he was resigned to being lead around by Saddam and his cronies.

CkG

LOL!!! :D

What seems to be so funny? I fail to see how failed inspections are funny:disgust:

CkG

I don't really recall people in January slamming the UN for not helping Blix. Why does the UN owe Blix an apology?
Also, isn't saying its the UNs fault that Blix didn't find any WMDs when there are no WMDs to be found a bit odd?

1. - BS, there was plenty of blame heaped on the UN.
2. - They didn't give him the tools, authority, security he needed to thouroughly and effectively search.
3. - No, I never said they owe him an apology for not actually finding the WMD - you put the "finding" stipulation on it. See #2;) If Blix had the freedom to search anywhere in Iraq without harassment from Saddam and still didn't find anything then there wouldn't have been a war;) But he wasn't able to search everywhere whenever he wanted. Saddam admitted to having such things and everyone in the UN agreed he had them at one time. So tell me where the oddity is now?

We've been over this a hundred time in this forum - and it's obvious some people just can't seem to get over their hatred of the US and Bush.

CkG

Blix had full access. What sites was he deneyed access to inspect? Saddam was doing some shady stuff as usual (can't fully interview scientists), but Blix could inspect whatever he wanted to.
So let me get this straight:
The UN is to blame because the inspections process was cut short bacause we couldn't wait any longer because Saddam was a direct threat to us with all his WMDs (the legality of the war was based on this reasoning). Now that we find that there were no WMDs to begin with(as of yet), the UN needs to apologize to Blix for not giving hime the tools, authority, and security to find the non-existent WMDs?? That's some twisted logic there.

No blix did not have full access. Inspectors NEVER had full access for over 10 years. Yeah, we cut the "inspections" short, if you call many years of inspections short
rolleye.gif

Again - you are not hearing me. If an "inspector" isn't given FULL access how can he state so difinitively that "there are no weapons"? How many palaces were "off limits"? or did you forget about those;) Or maybe you forgot how closely Saddam kept track of the "inspectors" and kept atleast one step ahead of them.

Oh and if that is such twisted logic then why did the UN even send inspectors in "to find" WMD since clearly there aren't any
rolleye.gif
Oh wait, I thought the UN PASSED MULTIPLE RESOLUTIONS STATING THAT HE MUST GET RID OF AND SHOW PROOF(of the destruction) OF HIS WMDs, but maybe that doesn't matter to you.

If you want to believe a murderer like Saddam instead of the US, UK, and UN go ahead, I won't stop you.:p

CkG
 

Zrom999

Banned
Apr 13, 2003
698
0
0
The inspectors found nothing, the military didn't find anything yet (I'm sure the military now has full access) and yet people still believe these weapons exist. Saddam isn't intimidating anyone now, and still no one has come forward to show proof these weapons exist. The Iraqi's bent over backwards for those inspectors, they wanted helicopters they got them, they wanted U2 flights they got them. Iraq gave in to every demand just to avoid war. Get over it, this war wasn't about weapons. There are dozens of countries that have those weapons and are run by people whose sanity can be questioned. Bush passed the point of no return long before the war even began. He would have looked real stupid if Blix didn't find anything and all those GIs sweating in the Kuwaiti desert would have to be recalled, so he rather not let that happen and attacked prematurely.

Maybe Bush knew all the weapons were gone and realized invading Iraq now would be a cakewalk. There are theories that the first Gulf War ended when it did because the US was afraid that those weapons would be used if they continued onward, and thats why Saddam claimed he won that war. Remove that threat and the country would be wide open and they can finish what they started.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Iraq gave in to every demand just to avoid war.

You are woefully misinformed, ignorant or have a memory problem. I think the highest grade Blix ever gave Iraq for cooperation was a 'B'. They hardly gave in to anything. Helicopter flights had to file a flight plan, U2 flights were req'd to give 48 hour notice and no scientist was interviewed outside the country or without an Iraqi 'observer'.
 

Zrom999

Banned
Apr 13, 2003
698
0
0
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Iraq gave in to every demand just to avoid war.

You are woefully misinformed, ignorant or have a memory problem. I think the highest grade Blix ever gave Iraq for cooperation was a 'B'. They hardly gave in to anything. Helicopter flights had to file a flight plan, U2 flights were req'd to give 48 hour notice and no scientist was interviewed outside the country or without an Iraqi 'observer'.

Flight plans and 48hr notice so unreasonable or abnormal? Maybe Iraq should have let them fly all over like madmen and maybe when there are some midair collisions and some trigger happy Air Defense missile battery officer shoots the U2 out of the sky inspections would have been better? These are simple safety precautions. They can interview scientist now without any interference, they find anything? The scientist wanted the observers back then. Ever think the observer was there to prevent them from beating the hell out of the scientist, tossing him a hole and saying he confessed and then attack?
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Zrom999 These are simple safety precautions. They can interview scientist now without any interference, they find anything? The scientist wanted the observers back then. Ever think the observer was there to prevent them from beating the hell out of the scientist, tossing him a hole and saying he confessed and then attack?

Right, we should have just allowed Saddam to torture them and their families
rolleye.gif


CkG
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: Zrom999
Originally posted by: Ultra Quiet
Iraq gave in to every demand just to avoid war.

You are woefully misinformed, ignorant or have a memory problem. I think the highest grade Blix ever gave Iraq for cooperation was a 'B'. They hardly gave in to anything. Helicopter flights had to file a flight plan, U2 flights were req'd to give 48 hour notice and no scientist was interviewed outside the country or without an Iraqi 'observer'.

Flight plans and 48hr notice so unreasonable or abnormal? Maybe Iraq should have let them fly all over like madmen and maybe when there are some midair collisions and some trigger happy Air Defense missile battery officer shoots the U2 out of the sky inspections would have been better? These are simple safety precautions. They can interview scientist now without any interference, they find anything? The scientist wanted the observers back then. Ever think the observer was there to prevent them from beating the hell out of the scientist, tossing him a hole and saying he confessed and then attack?

Yeah that must be it. The air traffic over Iraq or the U2's long history of being vulnerable to AA or SAM's and of course the UN inspectors who are infamous for their violent interrogation tactics.


Ladies and Gentleman I think we have found Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf.


 

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
UQ

Yeah that must be it. The air traffic over Iraq or the U2's long history of being vulnerable to AA or SAM's and of course the UN inspectors who are infamous for their violent interrogation tactics.


Ladies and Gentleman I think we have found Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf.[/quote]

I love it... you've made my hour...
LOL
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
CADkidaGUY - <<How many palaces were "off limits"? or did you forget about those >>

Apparently I must've. What places were "off limits"?

Edit: Nevermind. I'm a dork. You said palaces...not places.

Come to think of it, were the palaces off limits?
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Originally posted by: Gaard
CADkidaGUY - <<How many palaces were "off limits"? or did you forget about those >>

Apparently I must've. What places were "off limits"?

The WMD's were in Saddam's pants.




This has been enlightening. Not so long ago there was a thread about Japan pretty much refusing to admit it's part in WWII. Now I see the same thing here.

Nationalists always justify anything their government does. It's not over though. Some of the more interesting things to come will be here before the end of the (shudder) second Bush term.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: Gaard
CADkidaGUY - <<How many palaces were "off limits"? or did you forget about those >>

Apparently I must've. What places were "off limits"?

You mean palaces? (reread what you quoted)

Presidential palaces? Complete and unrestricted access;) meaning no advance warning, no hassles at the gate, no "guides".

CkG