• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Blair addresses the nation - your thoughts? Now with link!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: SnapIT
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: SnapIT
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Czar
aside from his wonderful tan and haircut, did he say anything important?


He thanked Iceland for their support in removing Saddam. 😉

Nah, iceland is not a rogue nation, so it will not go against the UN... you got it wrong...

SnapIT, do you like looking like an idiot? You must, you do it so well.



Comparing New Coalition, 1991 Alliance

"How the U.S.-led "coalition of the willing" compares to the 1991 alliance that drove Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait:

2003 ? 31 nations: Afghanistan , Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador , Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, South Korea , Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan.

U.S. State Department says 15 other unidentified countries also have pledged support.
...
"

46 rogue nations and the list is growing.

You got it wrong SnapIT, again.

Wow, wasn't THAT an irrelevant argument?


How do you figure? 😕
 
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: SnapITActually, if a leader of a country goes against 90% of your peoples will, you are finished, no matter what you, i or anyone else thinks about this war...
not in my country, why do you think Iceland is on the list of countires that are supporting this war:disgust:

It might be because they are capable of seeing the big picture.
then they wouldnt support it, because this war is no longer mainly about removing saddam, it is about keeping the limited world cooperation built in the last 50 years, going to war with such a big opposition from the world community has done severe damage to the world community

Looks like there is a lot of support. Feeling ok Czar?
yeah those two countries in the whole world where majority of the population supports it is realy a great support
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: SnapITActually, if a leader of a country goes against 90% of your peoples will, you are finished, no matter what you, i or anyone else thinks about this war...
not in my country, why do you think Iceland is on the list of countires that are supporting this war:disgust:

It might be because they are capable of seeing the big picture.
then they wouldnt support it, because this war is no longer mainly about removing saddam, it is about keeping the limited world cooperation built in the last 50 years, going to war with such a big opposition from the world community has done severe damage to the world community

Well, the way i see it is that this war is basically the US showing the world that they can do whatever they wish... just like another nation did so many years ago....

Terrorism... ehhh... nah...

WMD... REAL threatening, right, thousands of miles away... yeah... sooo threatening, especially as they were watched by just about every nation of the world...
 
SnapIT
Wow, wasn't THAT an irrelevant argument?

No, it was quite relevant. You said that Iceland would not support the US and Britain in removing Saddam. You were proved to be wrong, again and with the addition of showing that there are now more nations supporting his removal than those that supported the coalition in 1991.

Keep posting SnapIT, it just makes you look even more stupid every time.

 
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: SnapIT
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: SnapIT
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: Czar
aside from his wonderful tan and haircut, did he say anything important?


He thanked Iceland for their support in removing Saddam. 😉

Nah, iceland is not a rogue nation, so it will not go against the UN... you got it wrong...

SnapIT, do you like looking like an idiot? You must, you do it so well.



Comparing New Coalition, 1991 Alliance

"How the U.S.-led "coalition of the willing" compares to the 1991 alliance that drove Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait:

2003 ? 31 nations: Afghanistan , Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador , Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Japan, South Korea , Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan.

U.S. State Department says 15 other unidentified countries also have pledged support.
...
"

46 rogue nations and the list is growing.

You got it wrong SnapIT, again.

Wow, wasn't THAT an irrelevant argument?


How do you figure? 😕

Who started this?
 
Originally posted by: etech
SnapIT
Wow, wasn't THAT an irrelevant argument?

No, it was quite relevant. You said that Iceland would not support the US and Britain in removing Saddam. You were proved to be wrong, again and with the addition of showing that there are now more nations supporting his removal than those that supported the coalition in 1991.

Keep posting SnapIT, it just makes you look even more stupid every time.

You know, i have read your stupid posts ever since you stated that the US would NOT attack without UN support...

So suck it buddy boy, your rouge nation of a country started a war, not because it was necessary, but because you could...

This has gotten way off the subject. Please take it to the appropriate thread and cease with the childish personal insults.
 
Back
Top