These are in response to the science tragedy Originally posted by: FreemanHL2
My opinion is that your knowledge of the theories of physics are limited. You try to use logic in an attempt
to verify incorrect conclusions. Lets try to take these things one at a time.
First lets put something to rest.
Wormholes and blackholes are two different theories. (It is possible you were really thinking blackhole
every time you typed wormhole.
I'd like to add that just because you can no longer find the first atoms of the universe deos not mean the origin of the first atoms is "missing." Also if our universe is continually accelerating (expanding) than some force must be acting apon it... The only know force to do so is gravity, so logic dictates there is infact another spaciel object (perhaps another universes much larger than our own) pulling our universe towards it.
You have tried to use this first atoms concept before. It does not match any useful theory I have read. It is a theory derived only by yourself. According to most big bang theories, the explosion or super huge super collider that initially started off the universe sent everything flying away.
Perhaps there is unkown matter outside of our universe that is pulling us towords it. When a star collapses it INVERSES itself, therefore inversing all matter the star was made of, therefore you could say a wormhole is made of anti-matter or matter inverse to our own (Having exponential mass and therefore exponential gravity). Obviously the wormhole has to have an edge (the event horizone pre-determined by the size of the inversed star), anything that goes past the event horozine is instantaneuosly affected by the womrholes exponential mass and gravity. It would be an obvious conclusion that time could not exist in exponential mass and gravity, and anything going in the worm hole would be exponentially crushed, to the point were the matter is INVERSED and becomes antimatter (which i'll have you know is technically nothing to humans, because we are only capable of sensing real matter).
Please read a little about Black hole theory. What is currently held is that a star collapses in on itself and gravity prevents the solar mass from
escaping, it then condenses the matter down to as small as possible a size. You know have a smaller region of space occupied by roughly the same mass
as the star that collapsed. The force exerted on mass is equivalent to F=(G(m1)(m2))/(x*x).
G=Gravitational constant; m1=mass 1; m2=mass 2; x = distance between masses. AS the distance between masses decreases the force increases by a square factor.
In all acutuality time still exists for particles captured in a black hole, it is just slower to an outside observer, I do not believe it is an obvious conclusion as you state.
Therefore nothing would escape the wormhole, matter would just become part of the wormhole. Perhaps there is an infinite amount of anti-matter outside of our universe and it will continue to pull us towords it (at an increasing rate as we get closer to the centre of the anomoly). It is also worth thinking about the difference in perspective between INSIDE the wormhole and OUTSIDE the wormhole. Obviously the only things affected by the wormhole are those inside of it, so technically everything inside the wormhole ways nothing (or has an exponential weight which is technically the same thing if you think about it for long enough). But the collective anti-matter actually has a mass when wheighed in normal matter.
You seem to create an anti universe with your theory. It has now been postualted by Stephen Hawking that some energy can escape a black hole. Do some
reading to find out how. You make a conclusion that something that weighs nothing can be the same as something that weighs alot. It is really not a matter
of weight, it is a matter of mass. (Pun intended). Weight is the product of acceleration and mass. (Now, yes, weight can be used similarly but mass is
what is really important.) A super massive object and an object that has infinitesimal mass are not the same by any matter.
You keep stating anti-matter, I think that you do not have a clear concept of anti-matter. Anti-matter is existent in our universe and can be created
by some of the super colliders. Anti-matter taken to its particle level is a particle that has the same mass and spin as its own anti-particle,
the differences are its charge and timeline. The charge is opposite and the timeline is considered opposite. Example, the electron has an anti-particle
known as the positron. It has the same mass and spin, but the charges are opposite. When the 2 collide they create gamma radiation with an energy
equivalent to the 2 original particles masses. The timeline of the positron is theorized to be in reverse of the electrons.
Wormholes obviously contain no normal matter, and i think we can all assume that anything entering the wormhole is inversed (think about how it was created), so we may aswell say a wormhole is made of anti-matter. And logic obviously dictates that anything enering it would also become anti-matter? makes sense?
A couple of startling facts are:
Antimatter actually has a weight.
Antimatter can exist in normal matter.
A wormhole actually keeps consistent in size even though it has no real boundries... why deosn't a wormhole just suck everything in??? why deos a wormhole have an EVENT HORIZON???
I believe there is more to an event horozin than we may think, it is almost like it is keeping the wormhole together somehow... To finish things of, I don't believe time exists in a wormhole due to the fact that matter deosn't exist in a wormohle... It is just anti-matter, emitting a force on real particles.
I don't think anti-matter can be emitted from a wormhole because it is kept together by exponential gravity. Perghaps the universe is continually weighing more as it expands because somehow the distance is causing an increase in mass...
Black holes do contain normal matter according to current theories. Why do you think everyone will assume what you assume. I do not think that matter
entering a black hole becomes anti-matter. Your comments do not make sense with my understanding of physics. According to the first law of thermodynamics
you cannot create nor destory energy/mass. And the universe would not weigh any more or less due to expansion, what changes is the density due to expansion.
Your startling facts about anti-matter are not that starting to people who have done some some reading
and have been educated in the sciences.
What I would suggest is some serious scientific reading, other than the bible. (
HOLES in evolution).
Some people tend to do more reading of the highly technical forum than you think.
Also, please respond to the two questions I put to you in the thread mentioned. I eagerly await your answers.
Facebook
Twitter