• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Biology is making me doubt evolution

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: amoeba
To prevent any future mixups, OP, why don't you tell us what your understanding of evolution is?

Basically - I'm talking about species turning into other species on a large scale (not just like homo erectus -> homo sapien). I'm talking about chimps -> humans
I don't think theres any reason to go more in depth

see, there's a major mistake right there.

chimps never became humans. they diverged from a common ancestor. you still chimps hanging around, don't you?

besides, we're more related to bonobs than we are to chimps 😉

okay well we're both from the common ancestor. I didn't bother looking up exactly what we came from but I knew that it was some type of primate

see. you didn't bother looking it up. so, this fundamental moment in human evolution was not important enough for you to "look up."
why would you think that you had the energy, or desire, to even tackle all of the other evidence?

are you truly bothered enough to try and understand this theory, that is the foundation of modern medicine, among other things, or would you rather create another instant troll thread?

That's a retarded point. I just don't even want to bother to continue looking stuff up if I have to answer questions that seem to get either dumber or seem to get off topic

ah. there's the "16" coming through. :roll: The uh, "I don't understand your point, therefore I label it stupid and tell you to fuck off"

go smoke a doob, whack off to hannah montana, and troll somewhere else please.

there is too much tween angst in this thread.
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

Well, consider the fact that this forum isn't exactly conducive to learning, especially with so many different people calling him stupid.
 
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

You'll notice I wasn't replying to YOU, I was replying to dipshit. Or are you the same person?
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Mwilding
Originally posted by: Xylitol
My 16 year old brain is probably quicker than yours
clearly... Your ability to comprehend new knowledge reconcile it with your existing knowledge and use it to expand your horizons is astounding.

I haven't taken any college classes that would expand my horizon for knowledge

college isn't needed for that.

but an open mind with an ability to interpret novel information within its proper framework, is.
it's obvious that you simply don't want to think that it's possible. no one learns something that they refuse to understand.

perhaps it would help to accept the FACT that the field of Biology is based entirely on Evolution through Natural Selection. Essentially, there is no discipline within Biology that does not point to the foundation of life, which is evolution. You really can't accept a single tenet in Biology without staring evolutionary processes in the face. You may not understand that, but believe me, it's there.

Well obviously I used to think it was possible since I believed in it when I was in middle school; however, I changed my mind upon hearing more information.
I also obviously wanted to think that evolution on that level was possible since I believed in it before

do you realize how logically insane it is to stop believing in something when faced with more evidence to support it?

are you just pissed that you have all this homework, and don't really want to do it, so you're trying to convince yourself that it's not there?

How does greater complexity lessen it's relevance? You're actually approaching a point where you will surpass the great majority of the fundy science-deniers through exposure to some of the more fascinating and compelling arguments that evolution offers. Yet, like the others, you close your ears and shut your eyes yelling "Blah blah blah! I can't hear you Mr Evolution! You're too complex for me now so you no longer make sense!"

I don't mean to go about it this way, but that is exactly your argument.

You did a great deal of exaggeration but yes - my point is that it's very complex.

I said that learning the complexity in class made me stop believing in evolution. More information on proof of evolution was not the reason why I changed positions on this topic. You're the one who's logically insane for completely misunderstanding my point.

Don't bring up my personal life and homework because you don't know anything about me (or at least you shouldn't) beyond that I'm in a high school biology class
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

You'll notice I wasn't replying to YOU, I was replying to dipshit. Or are you the same person?

I'm his older brother.
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

Don't mention that you're a pastor's kid. Lots of pastor's kids turn away from what their parents teach due to the constrictions faced in their lives by their parents' doings (but that's not the point of this thread)

Again - I shed my pre-concieved bias that EVOLUTION EXISTED (NOT THAT IT DIDN'T EXIST). Again (in case it's still not clear enough to you) - I stopped believing in evolution after believing in it before

you still haven't mentioned why you supported evolution before (there must have been evidence that you understood, no?), and yet now you reject it in the face of GREATER evidence?

see, this is why people are attacking you. Your denial when you have a chance of more understanding makes this all the more retarded. If you can't understand it now, why should we think you had any valid reason to support it earlier? the only answer would be that you had "faith" in evolution, with no evidence. Scientists don't preach faith. they test and challenge.

and no, my accepting science was not a rebellion against being raised religious. Care to notice the part where i mention that my father was a biologist? way to pick the info and twist it in your blind favor. Point is, I was raised to explore my world, and question what was handed before me. Not simply say "BAHHH ME NO UNDERSTAND ANYMORE SO GO AWAY NOW!!! WAHHHHH"

you're just trying to get out of homework. admit it.


you live in Kansas, by chance?
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

I did not attack anyone first. I did however get lots of off topic remarks from many members who can't read.

Oh trust me - I learned. I came up to a conclusion that differed from my initial views and just because the change in my views was probably close to the opposite of yours does not mean that what I did is not learning
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: ICRS
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: ICRS
I will bet 10 to 1 that you believe in god. No doubt your delusions cloud your judgement.

Off topic -
Also - notice that I believed in evolution before taking biology this year

Doubtful, I think you always had delusions of god creating life deep down. You can tell your self you believed in evolution, but really you held deep delusions of god creation of life.

As it has been stated before, evolution does not attempt to explain the creation of life.

There is no logical reason why someone can't believe in a God and Evolution, too.

agreed. but those that deny evolution don't realize this. Why? B/c they have no effing clue what evolution is all about.
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: ICRS
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: ICRS
I will bet 10 to 1 that you believe in god. No doubt your delusions cloud your judgement.

Off topic -
Also - notice that I believed in evolution before taking biology this year

Doubtful, I think you always had delusions of god creating life deep down. You can tell your self you believed in evolution, but really you held deep delusions of god creation of life.

As it has been stated before, evolution does not attempt to explain the creation of life.

There is no logical reason why someone can't believe in a God and Evolution, too.

Precisely - why can't there be a supreme being that set up all of the parameters? Why does there have to be something controlling every aspect of our reality?
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: amoeba
To prevent any future mixups, OP, why don't you tell us what your understanding of evolution is?

Basically - I'm talking about species turning into other species on a large scale (not just like homo erectus -> homo sapien). I'm talking about chimps -> humans
I don't think theres any reason to go more in depth

see, there's a major mistake right there.

chimps never became humans. they diverged from a common ancestor. you still chimps hanging around, don't you?

besides, we're more related to bonobs than we are to chimps 😉

okay well we're both from the common ancestor. I didn't bother looking up exactly what we came from but I knew that it was some type of primate

see. you didn't bother looking it up. so, this fundamental moment in human evolution was not important enough for you to "look up."
why would you think that you had the energy, or desire, to even tackle all of the other evidence?

are you truly bothered enough to try and understand this theory, that is the foundation of modern medicine, among other things, or would you rather create another instant troll thread?

That's a retarded point. I just don't even want to bother to continue looking stuff up if I have to answer questions that seem to get either dumber or seem to get off topic

ah. there's the "16" coming through. :roll: The uh, "I don't understand your point, therefore I label it stupid and tell you to fuck off"

go smoke a doob, whack off to hannah montana, and troll somewhere else please.

there is too much tween angst in this thread.

I understand your point clearly. You said that there's something wrong with me not looking up "this fundamental moment in human evolution."

you're the one trolling. You have gone completely off topic by attacking my personal choice of research.
 
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

You'll notice I wasn't replying to YOU, I was replying to dipshit. Or are you the same person?

Is there something wrong with someone defending me? You have practically 90% (according to the poll) of the forum defending a point somewhat similar to yours
 
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

Well, consider the fact that this forum isn't exactly conducive to learning, especially with so many different people calling him stupid.

he admits that he doesn't care to look up essential arguments in evolutionary theory, at the same time he brands it "too complex to be real"

how do you expect someone like this to behave? he obviously doesn't want to learn, and he never wanted to by starting this thread. It's pretty clear that he had the intent of provoking negative responses, or he's even stupider than he makes himself out to be.
 
Originally posted by: Brainonska511
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Please watch this video:
Double Slit experiment with electrons

:shocked:

We've been talking about that in physics; pretty cool stuff. The only issue I have with the video is that it shows the one slit making no interference pattern, but you can show that light diffracts through a single slit (interference pattern results).

They showed that the single slit makes a diffraction.

EDIT: If you're talking about the pictures of the electrons, they probably just emphasized the maxima bands.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...S4qdTU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...n97vFE&feature=related
The diffraction bands in real life are rather dim and random in comparison to the maxima.

Originally posted by: miketheidiot
op has to be a troll

He's sixteen, he's an idiot.
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

Don't mention that you're a pastor's kid. Lots of pastor's kids turn away from what their parents teach due to the constrictions faced in their lives by their parents' doings (but that's not the point of this thread)

Again - I shed my pre-concieved bias that EVOLUTION EXISTED (NOT THAT IT DIDN'T EXIST). Again (in case it's still not clear enough to you) - I stopped believing in evolution after believing in it before

you still haven't mentioned why you supported evolution before (there must have been evidence that you understood, no?), and yet now you reject it in the face of GREATER evidence?

see, this is why people are attacking you. Your denial when you have a chance of more understanding makes this all the more retarded. If you can't understand it now, why should we think you had any valid reason to support it earlier? the only answer would be that you had "faith" in evolution, with no evidence. Scientists don't preach faith. they test and challenge.

and no, my accepting science was not a rebellion against being raised religious. Care to notice the part where i mention that my father was a biologist? way to pick the info and twist it in your blind favor. Point is, I was raised to explore my world, and question what was handed before me. Not simply say "BAHHH ME NO UNDERSTAND ANYMORE SO GO AWAY NOW!!! WAHHHHH"

you're just trying to get out of homework. admit it.


you live in Kansas, by chance?

Are you this mother f'n stupid? I said that I'm learning in biology class about the different organ systems and how complex they are. That has nothing to do with evolution; however, I came to my own conclusion from the complexity that evolution probably did not happen at such a large scale.

and no, my accepting science was not a rebellion against being raised religious. Care to notice the part where i mention that my father was a biologist? way to pick the info and twist it in your blind favor. Point is, I was raised to explore my world, and question what was handed before me. Not simply say "BAHHH ME NO UNDERSTAND ANYMORE SO GO AWAY NOW!!! WAHHHHH"

Did I ever say you were one of those pastor kids? I said "lots" and I know pastor kids like the ones I talked about

Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

Well, consider the fact that this forum isn't exactly conducive to learning, especially with so many different people calling him stupid.

he admits that he doesn't care to look up essential arguments in evolutionary theory, at the same time he brands it "too complex to be real"

how do you expect someone like this to behave? he obviously doesn't want to learn, and he never wanted to by starting this thread. It's pretty clear that he had the intent of provoking negative responses, or he's even stupider than he makes himself out to be.

That's a trivial point because obviously you understood the point that I was trying to make even if I got the facts somewhat wrong.

I want to learn and did learn. Trust me - by making conclusions that I'm somehow not qualified to be in an honors class makes you look stupider than you might actually be (MIGHT)
 
Originally posted by: Born2bwire

Originally posted by: miketheidiot
op has to be a troll

He's sixteen, he's an idiot.

Because... I have a difference in opinion from 90% of this forum? Because I learned and interpreted facts in a way "outside of the box?" Because you assume that 16 year olds like me are stupider than many people older than 16?

Why then?
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

I did not attack anyone first. I did however get lots of off topic remarks from many members who can't read.

Oh trust me - I learned. I came up to a conclusion that differed from my initial views and just because the change in my views was probably close to the opposite of yours does not mean that what I did is not learning

I'm sorry, but rejecting evolution is about everything you can do to not learn. that's a fact.

explain to me how pig insulin helps human diabetics? explain to me how I got a damn zebrafish to make protein out of mouse RNA that I had injected into it as a fertilized embryo (work for which I was published, mind you).

Explain the presence of mitochondria in every eukaryotic cell without it being a pre-historic invading bacterium. explain why 70% of the human genome is made up of extinct VIRUSES.

it goes on and on, but if you explain only these things outside of evolutionary theory, then the brightest 16 year-old on the planet will have managed to turn the scientific world on it's head and destroy the foundations of Biology and Medicine.
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Born2bwire

Originally posted by: miketheidiot
op has to be a troll

He's sixteen, he's an idiot.

Because... I have a difference in opinion from 90% of this forum? Because I learned and interpreted facts in a way "outside of the box?" Because you assume that 16 year olds like me are stupider than many people older than 16?

Why then?

No, you're sixteen. You're an idiot.
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: amoeba
To prevent any future mixups, OP, why don't you tell us what your understanding of evolution is?

Basically - I'm talking about species turning into other species on a large scale (not just like homo erectus -> homo sapien). I'm talking about chimps -> humans
I don't think theres any reason to go more in depth

see, there's a major mistake right there.

chimps never became humans. they diverged from a common ancestor. you still chimps hanging around, don't you?

besides, we're more related to bonobs than we are to chimps 😉

okay well we're both from the common ancestor. I didn't bother looking up exactly what we came from but I knew that it was some type of primate

see. you didn't bother looking it up. so, this fundamental moment in human evolution was not important enough for you to "look up."
why would you think that you had the energy, or desire, to even tackle all of the other evidence?

are you truly bothered enough to try and understand this theory, that is the foundation of modern medicine, among other things, or would you rather create another instant troll thread?

That's a retarded point. I just don't even want to bother to continue looking stuff up if I have to answer questions that seem to get either dumber or seem to get off topic

ah. there's the "16" coming through. :roll: The uh, "I don't understand your point, therefore I label it stupid and tell you to fuck off"

go smoke a doob, whack off to hannah montana, and troll somewhere else please.

there is too much tween angst in this thread.

I understand your point clearly. You said that there's something wrong with me not looking up "this fundamental moment in human evolution."

you're the one trolling. You have gone completely off topic by attacking my personal choice of research.

uh

you haven't done any research,. get it?

your choice of not researching does not mean you have chosen a method of research.
 
Well, when you get into more complex genetics classes, which involve how DNA mutations can have an effect on something, it is reasonable to believe that over several billion years, you're bound to get many, many different and sometimes beneficial mutations. I mean, as humans, we've developed enzymes/bacterial symbiotes that allow us to digest dairy products (lactose) within the past several thousand years. It's all a matter of probability.

(This doesn't mean that I don't believe in God. I don't know why people jump to that conclusion so quickly since neither disproves the other.)
 
Originally posted by: Born2bwire
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Born2bwire

Originally posted by: miketheidiot
op has to be a troll

He's sixteen, he's an idiot.

Because... I have a difference in opinion from 90% of this forum? Because I learned and interpreted facts in a way "outside of the box?" Because you assume that 16 year olds like me are stupider than many people older than 16?

Why then?

No, you're sixteen. You're an idiot.

QFT
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Born2bwire

Originally posted by: miketheidiot
op has to be a troll

He's sixteen, he's an idiot.

Because... I have a difference in opinion from 90% of this forum? Because I learned and interpreted facts in a way "outside of the box?" Because you assume that 16 year olds like me are stupider than many people older than 16?

Why then?

90% of this forum has a college education, and is much older/wiser than you. so yes, it does make you stupider. or rather, less smart. naive, perhaps.

these things can be fixed, but not if you continue to use the simplistic reasoning that you have displayed in this thread.
 
OP LET ME PARAPHRASE YOU: Humans are too complex to have evolved.

Everybody else: Example 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,...

You: Humans are too complex to have evolved

Everybody else: Example 6, 7, 8, 9,... what are you arguing?

You: Humans are too complex to have evolved

Everybody else: Example 10, 11, what the fuck are you arguing about?

You: ^^see first line

Everybody else: Troll


Basically, people have offered arguments and you have not responded to them. You keep on stating what you believe. Coool!!! Nobody gives a fuck. You didn't offer a thought provoking idea, you didn't change anybody else's mind, and you didn't provide any evidence. What do you cite as a proponent for intelligent design? The human body? People have already said that humanity has developed over billions of years. BILLIONS! If you say that billions of years isn't enough then prove why. Guess what: You haven't.

Scientists have spent their lives working on experiments and studies trying to figure out how evolution might have occurred etc. I'm sure you know better. Really. I mean you're the one who has done experiments, used the scientific method, demonstrated how complex is too complex.

Your using a logical Fallacy from the beginning. Appeal to Ignorance. It's amazing noone called you out on it(if they have my bad skimming 11 pages makes me not read everything). I can't possibly understand how things evolved over billions of years, then your conclusion: It is impossible. <- WRONG

Also you took a Bio H course in high school. Cool, I took a bio course my freshman year in High School. Ignorance is not an excuse for s***, How can you even begin to argue if you already admit that you only know what was in your high school class. You make statements extending over a vast range and then argue for them when your knowledge you admit is not nearly as vast. An Honors course? So? Honors, AP most of them are jokes. I'm taking Pre-calc H, Physics H, AP Lang, US 1 H, Chinese H. Guess what, I don't do anything all day. My classes I grind. I don't have much fun, I don't do much work. In fact today I pretty much came home, played some games till 8:00 finished Leon:The Professional(great film) at 9:00 procrastinated/started to do work and am finished now. School is a joke. Noone wants to learn. You've shown that you really don't want to learn. You want people to agree with your faulty logic. If you honestly consider this a thought-provoking discussion then your "learning" is nothing more than a sham for your beliefs.


I would have had sympathy for you but it dissipated away throughout the pages.

edit: I'm 16 and you got no sympathy. Get over yourself. :disgust:


2nd edit: I took human bio last semester. It was a really interesting course. I got to do a research project on the immune system. The complexity of it was amazing, yes. How chemotaxis(think that's it) allows the macrophages and other cells to migrate to exactly the sites where injury or infection has occured and many other things. The wonderful diverse amount of immune cells all with many different purposes. How macrophages can just stick out the proteins of a bacterium/virus? it just consumed. It doesn't mean I simply gave up and said, damn, too hard, Must be god. Fuckin lazy.
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

I did not attack anyone first. I did however get lots of off topic remarks from many members who can't read.

Oh trust me - I learned. I came up to a conclusion that differed from my initial views and just because the change in my views was probably close to the opposite of yours does not mean that what I did is not learning

I'm sorry, but rejecting evolution is about everything you can do to not learn. that's a fact.

explain to me how pig insulin helps human diabetics? explain to me how I got a damn zebrafish to make protein out of mouse RNA that I had injected into it as a fertilized embryo (work for which I was published, mind you).

Explain the presence of mitochondria in every eukaryotic cell without it being a pre-historic invading bacterium. explain why 70% of the human genome is made up of extinct VIRUSES.

it goes on and on, but if you explain only these things outside of evolutionary theory, then the brightest 16 year-old on the planet will have managed to turn the scientific world on it's head and destroy the foundations of Biology and Medicine.

Because insulin is a common hormone? That doesn't mean that we branched from a common ancestor.

I'm not going to believe that tons of random mutations in cells that managed to survive eventually led to some sexually reproducing, advanced organisms. I'm not going to think that those sexually reproducing organisms somehow found a mate that is similar enough that its cells recognize the other animal's gametes as its own to give birth to a kid that is different and somehow more complex.
I'm not going to believe that somehow cells learned to transmit hormones to each other during the fetus' development to tell each other where they are on the x,y, and z axis to turn into different parts of a body.
I'm not going to believe in evolution just because it's the most consistent theory out there in the sciences - there are still plenty of holes in that argument
 
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: IAteYourMother
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Xylitol
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Just because it's complex doesn't mean it *has* to be created by some being that is everlasting, omnipotent, and "god-like".

Complexity != intelligent design

I never said we were created by a god-like being but i don't believe in evolution at this level

So you did not believe in it when you went into the class and now you are reaching by trying to use it to back up your biased belief?

I believed in it after 8th grade biology when it was so simple

wat? so now that evolution is far more complex. and with overwhelming mountains of evidence to support, from every discipline in medicine and biology, you are now inclined to reject it?

Honors class my ass. (not the class; but the fact that you were allowed to register for it)

Yeah, you're right, you must've been waaaay smarter as a 16 year old...

well, I was raised by a Biologist, for one. (oh, and my mother is a minister...so no real bias either way there). I'm guessing at 16, I had a stronger science background than the ave kid my age. But this kind of "smart" isn't about knowledge.

OP's stubbornness is not about stupidity or age, it's in a mind that is unwilling to shed pre-conceived biases in the light of knowledge. That is the problem. A mind that refuses to test and to question will never learn.

So...no, I wasn't like that at 16.

But why is it an unwillingness to learn? Perhaps his biology course isn't sufficient to explain enough for him. Unfortunately, there are just so many attacks on him that simply push aside all the actual biology.

Or maybe he's a douche who attacks others first? I tried to offer him some thought-provoking questions, and he pushed them aside.

The OP is doomed to a life of failure if he's unwilling to learn.

I did not attack anyone first. I did however get lots of off topic remarks from many members who can't read.

Oh trust me - I learned. I came up to a conclusion that differed from my initial views and just because the change in my views was probably close to the opposite of yours does not mean that what I did is not learning

I'm sorry, but rejecting evolution is about everything you can do to not learn. that's a fact.

explain to me how pig insulin helps human diabetics? explain to me how I got a damn zebrafish to make protein out of mouse RNA that I had injected into it as a fertilized embryo (work for which I was published, mind you).

Explain the presence of mitochondria in every eukaryotic cell without it being a pre-historic invading bacterium. explain why 70% of the human genome is made up of extinct VIRUSES.

it goes on and on, but if you explain only these things outside of evolutionary theory, then the brightest 16 year-old on the planet will have managed to turn the scientific world on it's head and destroy the foundations of Biology and Medicine.

Because insulin is a common hormone? That doesn't mean that we branched from a common ancestor.

I'm not going to believe that tons of random mutations in cells that managed to survive eventually led to some sexually reproducing, advanced organisms. I'm not going to think that those sexually reproducing organisms somehow found a mate that is similar enough that its cells recognize the other animal's gametes as its own to give birth to a kid that is different and somehow more complex.
I'm not going to believe that somehow cells learned to transmit hormones to each other during the fetus' development to tell each other where they are on the x,y, and z axis to turn into different parts of a body.
I'm not going to believe in evolution just because it's the most consistent theory out there in the sciences - there are still plenty of holes in that argument
Wow you answered what everybody else thought. You came in and said "I'm not going to believe..." WHAT THE FUCK WAS THE POINT OF THIS THREAD?
 
Back
Top