Must be tough getting through life when you can't even understand the fundamental differences between what happened in Yemen versus this case.
Both US Citizens right? Constitutional rights apply to both. Not hard to understand. Unless you can show something in US Law differently?
Go talk to your obummer about that.
Not mine. But guess you need to throw in a troll comment right away.
Hmm, this story is being reported as terrorism, and they are arrested and charged with trying to commit acts of terror. Who said it isn't terrorism?
Is it really that hard to understand the difference between someone being part of an organization that believes in terror to further it's goals (ie, a terrorist organization) versus someone who goes off by themselves and does something?
Read the threads here.....if you are white and do something, it isn't a big deal and called " isolated" or "crazy guy".
If a Muslim name is in the news article, theatrics ensue, where people don't care about proof, people want Miranda rights taken away, or have them tortured, or locked up forever, etc, etc, etc.
The Iranian used-car salesman is already guilty without a trial, since so many people just accept the secret evidence that no one is allowed to see, and others claiming it an act of war. But with these North Georgia guys, it's "innocent until proven guilty" and "lets wait for the trial".
Most people didn't care that Padilla was locked up for years without trial either, he was a US citizen too. Or the separate assassinations of al-alaki and his 16year old son. No due process there either.
Certainly is an interesting double standard that a lot of people hold. Pick and choose when you want the law to be applied.
Compare the media coverage for these guys, or the guy that crashed his plane into the IRS building versus Padilla, al-alaki, or the used car salesman. You really can't see a difference in how people act and how the reporting sides one way or another? LOL