Bin Laden's burial at sea--why was it so important to adhere to Muslim funeral rites?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,684
136
Bin Laden was a pariah to muslim governments everywhere. The notion that any would have allowed burial of his remains on their territory is absurd. It'd be begging for abuse.

I suppose his remains could have been flown to Antarctica for earth burial, but even then somebodies would know where it was.

As for the muslim rites, there's no point in adding insult to injury- it just pisses people off unnecessarily. Burial at sea seems like a very well thought out split the difference approach.

As for the rest of it, there are troofers, birthers, and now corpsers...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
You can find a Muslim cleric ready to declare Disney Land an outrage. Bitching is a time honored tradition among Christian fundamentalists as well. So what.

Christian fundis don't have hit men, tortures and terrorists in employ like muslim clerics. Well least not since The Pear of Anguish and Pillory was stopped being used by the Church after reformation. Ever notice every Cleric has a Militia? Today they use power drills and electric shock.
 
Last edited:
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Burial at Sea and within 24 hours, only serves to prevent a grave site Al-Quida supporters can rally around as a holy site.

Now that I think about it, perhaps we should have buried him in a public place in an area under an ally's control. We should then take a page out of the short story "The Marching Morons" and plant people in the Jihadist community to proclaim how great it is to visit the Osama holy grave site.

Then when anyone goes to visit, we rendition them, squeeze them for intelligence information, and seal their bodies in a pig blood barrel. Rinse, wash, repeat. That might be a great way to bring Al Queda and Islamicists out of the woodwork and further eliminate them.

Already many Muslim clerics have weighed in as outraged.

Bin Laden was a piece of horse manure! Why are they outraged? Perhaps the outrage is that we're not exterminating anyone who would be outraged by our treatment of Bin Laden.

We should set up some sort of a funeral procession with a fake Bin Laden body and kill everyone that comes to the funeral.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
BTW the funeral was performed by an imam. I hope the Muslim World realizes what we do even for our most hated enemies who are Muslim.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
For as much as it would have been personally satisfying to hear that we desecrated his corpse with bacon, I think that the military and the government handled this matter in the best way possible.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Funny, I thought The Muslim World hates bin Laden and doesn't support terrorism. Suddenly they're all terrorist supporting jihadists like the rightwingers have been saying? Son of a bitch...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As expected, Throckmortan has the understanding of a small child. Many Muslims opposed to Bin Laden can also become more US negative because of US insensitivity to Muslim burial customs.

But in only the minds of small children does there exist that binary belief, that you are all for us or all against us.

But the die is already cast for all time, Osama is dead and is buried at sea, how that plays out in the Muslim world is now what matters. Does it open new wounds or heal them, only later events can answer the question.
 

wuliheron

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,536
0
0
Christian fundis don't have hit men, tortures and terrorists in employ like muslim clerics. Well least not since The Pear of Anguish and Pillory was stopped being used by the Church after reformation. Ever notice every Cleric has a Militia? Today they use power drills and electric shock.


images
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Because we have a professional military in every sense of the word. They handled it very professionally, IMO.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Now that I think about it, perhaps we should have buried him in a public place in an area under an ally's control. We should then take a page out of the short story "The Marching Morons" and plant people in the Jihadist community to proclaim how great it is to visit the Osama holy grave site.

Then when anyone goes to visit, we rendition them, squeeze them for intelligence information, and seal their bodies in a pig blood barrel. Rinse, wash, repeat. That might be a great way to bring Al Queda and Islamicists out of the woodwork and further eliminate them.



Bin Laden was a piece of horse manure! Why are they outraged? Perhaps the outrage is that we're not exterminating anyone who would be outraged by our treatment of Bin Laden.

We should set up some sort of a funeral procession with a fake Bin Laden body and kill everyone that comes to the funeral.

Somebodies been reading Jungle Patrol. It worked for Capt Rodgers where moro fundis ceased all activity in his sector and I think would work again and it is incumbent on us to do this. But war has not really started yet.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As expected, Throckmortan has the understanding of a small child. Many Muslims opposed to Bin Laden can also become more US negative because of US insensitivity to Muslim burial customs.

But in only the minds of small children does there exist that binary belief, that you are all for us or all against us.

But the die is already cast for all time, Osama is dead and is buried at sea, how that plays out in the Muslim world is now what matters. Does it open new wounds or heal them, only later events can answer the question.

We weren't insensitive to Muslim burial customs. He was buried at sea by an imam.

But he's not supposed to be a "true Muslim" anyway. Would Christians get upset if Reverend Phelps was killed and not given a proper Christian burial? That would hypocritical of them after claiming he's not a true Christian wouldn't it?
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
The US claimed they made a gesture at trying to conform to Muslim tradition. If that isn't good enough for Muslims tough shit. Of course, if it makes you feel better I'm sure every Muslim and Imam would love nothing better then to tell you their feelings on the subject. Oh, I forgot, asking people about their feelings instead of jumping to conclusions isn't your strong suit.
So...how does that make you feel?
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Burying him on land would have given people a place to visit and remember the man. Burning the body would have been an insult to Islam. Feeding him to the sharks in the middle of nowhere and claiming they were trying to observe Islamic tradition took care of all the complications.
Winner!
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,132
32,475
136
The decision to bury him at sea was pretty slick. The US can rightfully claim it honored Islamic practices while at the same time delivering a grave insult to Bin Laden's memory. Back in the good old days when the Ottoman Sultans were particularly annoyed with someone they would have them strangled and the body cast into the Bosporus. Dumping the corpse into the sea was considered a final humiliation.
 

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
We weren't insensitive to Muslim burial customs. He was buried at sea by an imam.

But he's not supposed to be a "true Muslim" anyway. Would Christians get upset if Reverend Phelps was killed and not given a proper Christian burial? That would hypocritical of them after claiming he's not a true Christian wouldn't it?

Yea. You don't get to pick and choose who is part of your religion, and even not religious and not caring about my body after I'm dead I think peoples wishes in that regard should be reasonably upheld.
 

wuliheron

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
3,536
0
0
The decision to bury him at sea was pretty slick. The US can rightfully claim it honored Islamic practices while at the same time delivering a grave insult to Bin Laden's memory. Back in the good old days when the Ottoman Sultans were particularly annoyed with someone they would have them strangled and the body cast into the Bosporus. Dumping the corpse into the sea was considered a final humiliation.


Its nice to see they've got all the details and nuances down after all the time and money they've spent on Islamic terrorists.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
To many Muslims he is a modern Robin Hood or Jesse James who stood up to the evil west. The US wanted to erase his memory as thoroughly as possible from the Muslim world.

Burying him on land would have given people a place to visit and remember the man. Burning the body would have been an insult to Islam. Feeding him to the sharks in the middle of nowhere and claiming they were trying to observe Islamic tradition took care of all the complications.

This, and it was the only reason.
 

superccs

Senior member
Dec 29, 2004
999
0
0
Because they weren't quick thinking enough to stuff a rocket up his ass and send him to the moon Roadrunner style...
coyote-and-rocket1.jpg
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Somebodies been reading Jungle Patrol. It worked for Capt Rodgers where moro fundis ceased all activity in his sector and I think would work again and it is incumbent on us to do this. But war has not really started yet.

Actually, I've never heard of that book. I have had this sort of strategy in mind for years (mostly to be used against Palestinians who attend funerals for suicide bombers).
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
I don't remember any of the INNOCENT 2K plus people at Ground Zero had any proper burial processes. Many of their bodies never found.

<<---- was at Ground Zero a few days ago.
 
Last edited:

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
I don't remember any of the INNOCENT 2K plus people at Ground Zero had any proper burial processes. Many of their bodies never found.

<<---- was at Ground Zero a few days ago.

Part of being civilized is maintaining your decency even in the face of barbarians, and I'm sure if Osama was splattered across a wall from a 500lb bomb he wouldn't have gotten a burial either.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
A burial at sea assures no place for mourners to gather and turn into a shrine.

This is why it was done. I'm sure someone already stated this.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
It dilutes where mourners can come, and worship.

But the Arabian Sea is a pretty big target. :)

-John
 

JimW1949

Senior member
Mar 22, 2011
244
0
0
Maybe I am just conspiracy minded, but I have to wonder whether he was killed on Sunday, or if he was really killed several years ago. Nobody has seen him since about 2001 and the audio/video tapes of him which surfaced have left a lot of people with the impression they were fake. I have no way of knowing one way or the other, I just wonder about it at times.