Bill Gates is the Secretary of Defense

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
eskimo, Gerald Ford was a star football player at the University of Michigan and helped the team to two national titles. After college he was offered a chance to play with TWO NFL teams. And yet he is remembered as klutz due to one fall down a stairs and then Chevy Chase making fun of him on SNL.

Perception and reality tend to be very different things when it comes to figures such as Bush and Obama.
 

extra

Golden Member
Dec 18, 1999
1,947
7
81
Originally posted by: chess9
When Bush made a mistake, we took it for confirmatory evidence that Alzheimer's had set in early. When Obama makes a mistake, we take it for confirmatory evidence he is human. One of these assumptions is false. Which is it? Hmmm....

-Robert

Uhhhh...

It's pretty clear to most of us that Bush made a pretty drastic decline in his apparent mental capacities in the 8 years he was in office. Whether that is due to early onset dementia, or whatever, who knows. But it's pretty apparent.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
I'm still waiting for a president that just speaks, without the prepared speeches that have been edited, reviewed by a cabinet of people to say just the right thing. I don't even watch presidents speak anymore. Just email the copy off the teleprompter or get another actor to do the book on tape version. I want to know what the president really thinks, not what his advisors think he should be saying.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
eskimo, Gerald Ford was a star football player at the University of Michigan and helped the team to two national titles. After college he was offered a chance to play with TWO NFL teams. And yet he is remembered as klutz due to one fall down a stairs and then Chevy Chase making fun of him on SNL.

Perception and reality tend to be very different things when it comes to figures such as Bush and Obama.

Your basic point that the image of Ford was exaggerated as a klutz is right.

But if you were more honest, you would both acknowledge that was more to the case than you list (such as hitting a lady in the galley with his golf ball and hitting his tennis double's partner in the head with the ball), and especially you would acknowledge when the same thing (but much worse) is done to those you politically disagree with (as I just did, setting an example for you), such as the media hype over Carter and the 'killer rabbit', or especially the Gore is a liar crap.

But it was just hours ago, when confronted with the lies about Gore, that you defended them. So, you are very selective in yuor correcting of the media lies, and it's not honest.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
In fact, there are some additional 14 US territories if not more because some of them are uninhabited. I have to wonder if the actual script should have read
50 States and seven major US territories, and somehow Obama screwed up and shortened it.

But when it comes to lies, damn lies, and statistics, some of them are simply comical errors not intended to damage and other are calculated lies intended to damage. And we should not lose sight of that point. BFD, our public officials do not know everything and on a distressing large number of occasions, get facts wrong or misspeak.

i think it was supposed to be 57 primaries, i believe thats how many there are
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I'm still waiting for a president that just speaks, without the prepared speeches that have been edited, reviewed by a cabinet of people to say just the right thing. I don't even watch presidents speak anymore. Just email the copy off the teleprompter or get another actor to do the book on tape version. I want to know what the president really thinks, not what his advisors think he should be saying.

When's the last time you ad-libbed in front of hundreds of millions of people?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,254
55,808
136
Originally posted by: Hacp

Affirmative Action didn't play a role, I'm suuuuure..

I love how when white people have their parents get them into good colleges through their connections that's just life, but when black people get into good colleges it must be through some sort of unfair advantage.

Of course you're just making unfounded accusations without any evidence, but that's what morons do that can't back up their actual positions. You're an embarrassing retard who discredits people who hold similar opinions. (I welcome your stupidity by the way, because you only help my side.)
 

First

Lifer
Jun 3, 2002
10,518
271
136
Originally posted by: dali71
If Obama is such an intellectual giant, why does he still refuse to release his college transcripts?

His academic record at Harvard Law speaks for itself.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dali71
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RyESrsd6CI

This is pretty funny, but one has to wonder what the MSM would have done if Bush had made the same mistake. I suspect that we won't hear too much about this, similar to how his 57 states gaffe was buried.

It's pretty funny when the righties who are the group that has huge double standards at forgiving their own side but screams like babies over any trivial issue by Democrats, pretends that it's the other way around. You have to be terribly deluded and ignorant to try to do that. Bush got huge passes all the time, while the right has raised all kinds of nonsense over every Democrat, especially Obama, when he's not putting lipstick on a pig of palling around with terrorists.

What a crock of crap the bolded statement is.

It looks like one to the ignorant.

Let's pick just one example to make the point.

In the campaign of 2000, the media bought the Bush attack line against Gore as a 'liar' hook, line, and sinker. They couldn't give enough coverage to the nonsense of his 'lies', dozens of the nonsense stories, from the invention of a 'lie' about Gore claiming to "invent the internet", (what he actually said was true about his leadership); about his exaggerating his and Tipper being the basis for the couple in 'Love Story' (what he actually said was completely accurate); trying to twist a minor error in who he had flown with when visiting a fores tfire into a 'lie', claims he exaggerated his role in the Love Canal investigation (what he said was accurate), and so on. This false and negative coverage of "Gore as liar" easily cost him more than the 435 Florida votes deciding who was president.

On the other hand, George Bush as a young man had seen his father lose a Congressional race to a Texan who won by attacking Bush Sr. as a 'Connecticut Preppy' while the Texan was a 'real Texan'. Bush learned the lesson to never let that happen. Shortly before the 2000 race, Bush bought a ranch - and pretended he was a 'rancher'. Cowboy hat, clearing brush, whatever - he would be a 'real rancher Texan', and avoid the dangers of being accused of what he was, a Harvard and Yale rich kid draft dodger.

Bush could have *easily* been exposed and ridiculed by the press for his act as a 'good ol' boy', but instead the press just went with it and did not ridicule him the way they did Gore.

There are all kinds of examples of Bush getting a pass, but you don't care about the facts, it appears.

"Huge passes", my butt. This was reported, and he was ridiculed for it.

If you honestly thought that any of this "cost [Gore] more than the 435 Florida votes deciding who was president", how many votes did it cost Bush when Al Gore claimed his healthcare plan would make it so that people didn't have to "pretend to be a dog or a cat to get a price break"?

BTW, in case you forgot, here's Gore's quite re: the Internet: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Huh. I didn't realize he was a Senator before the 80's. Applying your Bush reasoning to Gore, he's a liar, too. Funny what a slip of the tongue (either intentional or unintentional) can do.

I like how you call somebody that calls out your crap statements as crap "ignorant." What a mental giant you are.

 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Obama could have shown himself to have a good sense of humor if he had Blared. FUCKING WINDOWS 98 after saying Bill Gates' name.

:laugh:
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I'm still waiting for a president that just speaks, without the prepared speeches that have been edited, reviewed by a cabinet of people to say just the right thing. I don't even watch presidents speak anymore. Just email the copy off the teleprompter or get another actor to do the book on tape version. I want to know what the president really thinks, not what his advisors think he should be saying.

When's the last time you ad-libbed in front of hundreds of millions of people?


Speak from the heart and not the mind and you don't have to worry about slip ups. It is only when you are thinking of how to say something other than what you are thinking that the slips occur. Public speaking 101.

 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I'm still waiting for a president that just speaks, without the prepared speeches that have been edited, reviewed by a cabinet of people to say just the right thing. I don't even watch presidents speak anymore. Just email the copy off the teleprompter or get another actor to do the book on tape version. I want to know what the president really thinks, not what his advisors think he should be saying.

When's the last time you ad-libbed in front of hundreds of millions of people?


Speak from the heart and not the mind and you don't have to worry about slip ups. It is only when you are thinking of how to say something other than what you are thinking that the slips occur. Public speaking 101.

The POTUS can't speak "from the heart" because he's not speaking for himself, but for the United States Government.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,254
55,808
136
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

"Huge passes", my butt. This was reported, and he was ridiculed for it.

If you honestly thought that any of this "cost [Gore] more than the 435 Florida votes deciding who was president", how many votes did it cost Bush when Al Gore claimed his healthcare plan would make it so that people didn't have to "pretend to be a dog or a cat to get a price break"?

BTW, in case you forgot, here's Gore's quite re: the Internet: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Huh. I didn't realize he was a Senator before the 80's. Applying your Bush reasoning to Gore, he's a liar, too. Funny what a slip of the tongue (either intentional or unintentional) can do.

I like how you call somebody that calls out your crap statements as crap "ignorant." What a mental giant you are.

First of all, Al Gore WAS in the Congress before the 1980's. He took office in 1977. Secondly, the Internet is not some block of technology that was created all at once, and Al Gore specifically helped create the system that we now know of as the Internet. For example, he was one of the primary sponsors of the National High-Performance Computer Act of 1988 that linked schools and libraries together, really forming the backbone of the modern Internet.

So while he might not have invented TCP/IP, he most certainly helped create the network as we know it. As someone else put it (I can't remember who), Eisenhower could have claimed to have created the interstate highway system. That doesn't mean he was claiming to have invented highways, and it wouldn't make him a liar to say it.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Modelworks
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I'm still waiting for a president that just speaks, without the prepared speeches that have been edited, reviewed by a cabinet of people to say just the right thing. I don't even watch presidents speak anymore. Just email the copy off the teleprompter or get another actor to do the book on tape version. I want to know what the president really thinks, not what his advisors think he should be saying.

When's the last time you ad-libbed in front of hundreds of millions of people?


Speak from the heart and not the mind and you don't have to worry about slip ups. It is only when you are thinking of how to say something other than what you are thinking that the slips occur. Public speaking 101.

The POTUS can't speak "from the heart" because he's not speaking for himself, but for the United States Government.


So when he says things that start with "I " he means the government ? Hrm, then he really does need some acting classes.
 

dali71

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2003
1,117
21
81
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: dali71
If Obama is such an intellectual giant, why does he still refuse to release his college transcripts?

His academic record at Harvard Law speaks for itself.

And what academic record is that? How was he accepted into Harvard Law after graduating from Columbia University without honors? And why won't he discuss his Columbia days? According to the New York Times, "he declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years".

His selection as president of the Harvard Law Review is also not a clear indication of his academic rank. From the New York Times: "Until the 1970's the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank. Among these were Elliot L. Richardson, the former Attorney General, and Irwin Griswold, a dean of the Harvard Law School and Solicitor General under Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon.

That system came under attack in the 1970's and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition. The new system, disputed when it began, was meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review
." Also, there was never anything credited to him in the HLR (or any other law journal). So I ask you again...what academic record?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee

"Huge passes", my butt. This was reported, and he was ridiculed for it.

If you honestly thought that any of this "cost [Gore] more than the 435 Florida votes deciding who was president", how many votes did it cost Bush when Al Gore claimed his healthcare plan would make it so that people didn't have to "pretend to be a dog or a cat to get a price break"?

BTW, in case you forgot, here's Gore's quite re: the Internet: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Huh. I didn't realize he was a Senator before the 80's. Applying your Bush reasoning to Gore, he's a liar, too. Funny what a slip of the tongue (either intentional or unintentional) can do.

I like how you call somebody that calls out your crap statements as crap "ignorant." What a mental giant you are.

First of all, Al Gore WAS in the Congress before the 1980's. He took office in 1977. Secondly, the Internet is not some block of technology that was created all at once, and Al Gore specifically helped create the system that we now know of as the Internet. For example, he was one of the primary sponsors of the National High-Performance Computer Act of 1988 that linked schools and libraries together, really forming the backbone of the modern Internet.

So while he might not have invented TCP/IP, he most certainly helped create the network as we know it. As someone else put it (I can't remember who), Eisenhower could have claimed to have created the interstate highway system. That doesn't mean he was claiming to have invented highways, and it wouldn't make him a liar to say it.

Respnding to FuzzyBee:

During my service in the United States Congress

Note he doesn't say 'during his work at Bell Labs as a network designer', he says 'service in the United States Congress', making it pretty clear his role was AS A POLITICIAN.

What do politicians do to lead on issues? They fund things and they make speeches. So what you look for on his internet work is, did he fund it, or did he make speeches?

You don't look - unless you are utterly dishonest - for him to have done the hands-on technical work any more than you discuss FDR's WWII leadership by his carrying a gun.

I took the initiative in creating the Internet

What does it mean for the member of Congress to 'take the initiative'? It means for them to identify an issue and make it a priority to push for funding.

Few people understood the promise of the internet before it was created. Gore seems to have been the member of Congress more than any of his 534 colleagues who did, and who prioritized the funding for the internet. His leadership on the issue was directly important to the funding of the creation of the internet.

Of course, the guys who actually did the creation at a technical level may resent this politician implying that he had more of a role than he did, exaggerating the importance of the government's funding role, and so they might say some bad things about Gore grabbing credit.

Oh, wait, they don't. They actually put out statements saying how critical a role Gore played and supporting his statement.

What we have are liars who try to misrepresent what Gore said and idiots who believe them. You can pick which of those two groups you want to be in, but it's one of them.

Use a little common sense here. The internet is widely viewed as *the* societal avhievment/progress in the last 20 years or so. Should the member of Congress who was a leader in prioritizing its creation be given credit for doing so? Common sense says yes. It's just idiotic to *attack* him for this instead of giving that credit - and it gave us a disaster of a president for 8 years instead of a hell of a leader.

Nations who are idiots in selecting their leaders pay a price. You are supporting our nation paying that price, by ridiculously promoting lies about Gore.

By the way, the above is far more than enough to prove my point but note one additional thing - how since what Gore said was pretty clearly fine, they had to lie about what he said, to change his words to say he said he "invented the internet", which WOULD be excessive - but the fact they had to lie to get the right words to mock shows how empty their attack was. You had sleazeball liars who opposed the public interest standing up and mockng Gore's real leadership by saying they 'invented the paper clip'. Lies.

But plenty of voters are idiots and fall for the lies. The 'big lie' is to repeat the lie and people believe it, and it sure was effective with the big lie on Gore 'inventing the Internet'.
 

Andrew111

Senior member
Aug 6, 2001
792
0
0
Originally posted by: gardener
The crucial difference, he knows its a mistake.

Bush wouldn't get it. He'd repeat it ad nauseam. The right would also believe it.

LOL, did you watch the video? He never realized it.....watch the 57 states video too. Someone in the audience even busted out laughing when he said 57 states and he was oblivious. Harvard education FTW!!
 

Extelleron

Diamond Member
Dec 26, 2005
3,127
0
71
Anyone who is in the national spotlight as much as the POTUS is going to get caught saying something stupid every once and a while. You can't expect someone to be perfect just because they are the POTUS. Policy and actions matter so much more than little things like this (although something small like this gets more attention than issues that are actually important).

I am sure though that if Bush had said something like this the press would have made a bigger deal than with Obama saying it. But Bush definitely said his share of dumb things as well. Although nobody can live up to the standard of Dan Quayle...
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Anyone who is in the national spotlight as much as the POTUS is going to get caught saying something stupid every once and a while. You can't expect someone to be perfect just because they are the POTUS. Policy and actions matter so much more than little things like this (although something small like this gets more attention than issues that are actually important).

I am sure though that if Bush had said something like this the press would have made a bigger deal than with Obama saying it. But Bush definitely said his share of dumb things as well. Although nobody can live up to the standard of Dan Quayle...

Biden seems to be coming pretty close.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Originally posted by: dali71
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RyESrsd6CI

This is pretty funny, but one has to wonder what the MSM would have done if Bush had made the same mistake. I suspect that we won't hear too much about this, similar to how his 57 states gaffe was buried.

Oh WoW, got Bill and Rob Gates mixed up there! WoW! 57 states was a joke that whizzed right over your head.:cookie:
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
You people on the left need to learn how to take a joke!!!!

This is why left wing radio fails.

Right wing hears a mistake like this and jokes about it for an hour, left wing radio hears the same things and start making excuses.

What excuses are being made, and for that matter who is making a big deal out of this? It was a simple slip- whats the big deal...

This thread is the only place I have even seen this.... Its nothing more than a good excuse for you to get in a few jabs at the left.

Whatever.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: FuzzyBee
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: dali71
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RyESrsd6CI

This is pretty funny, but one has to wonder what the MSM would have done if Bush had made the same mistake. I suspect that we won't hear too much about this, similar to how his 57 states gaffe was buried.

It's pretty funny when the righties who are the group that has huge double standards at forgiving their own side but screams like babies over any trivial issue by Democrats, pretends that it's the other way around. You have to be terribly deluded and ignorant to try to do that. Bush got huge passes all the time, while the right has raised all kinds of nonsense over every Democrat, especially Obama, when he's not putting lipstick on a pig of palling around with terrorists.

What a crock of crap the bolded statement is.

It is amazing the level of selective amnesia the left has suddenly developed. Bush got a pass lmao. What world were they visiting the last 8 years? And what msgboard?

Bush couldnt even wipe his ass right without some blog yapping about how he actually did it wrong and it is a conspiracy because he clearly wiped it with the Koran after slapping some terrists in gitmo with it.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
You got Obama there, he called secretary of defense William instead of Robert Gates.
Good catch, man.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Hacp
[Affirmative Action didn't play a role, I'm suuuuure..

Did you mistype your handle, 'Hack'? Why don't you do a little research and provide any evidence for your claim.

Many of our leading black politicians have benefitted from Afiirmative Action to overcome early hurdles - and went on to varying degrees of service. For example Colin Powell did, and he supports AA, and while I'm no fan of his, I certainly recognize he did a lot well to get where he did. On the other hand, Clarence Thomas' AA should have stopped earlier; his appointment to the Sureme Court on the basis of being in two groups, black and far right, was a disaater.

Condoleez Rice is reported to confirm she benefitted as well, though she turned around in the position she got as an AA appointee and worked to end AA in tenure for others.

You disparage Obama out of your ignorance. Can you show his leadership of the Harvard Law Review to be lacking? If not, you have no point - just racist idiocy.