Depends on the child. Some children will actually increase your health service requirements.
You could always just google it:
Pursuant to G.L. c. 111M, § 2, the Department of Revenue is issuing this Technical Information Release to announce the penalty schedule for individuals who fail to comply in 2020 with the requirements under the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act (the Act). See St. 2006, c. 58, as amended. The...
www.mass.gov
Funny enough, if the fees are so low that it's not an obstacle, why did the GOP make such a huge deal about it. There were a couple of loons on this forum that went balls crazy over it.
And again, the thread is about whether or not an insurer should even be able to deny ER visits at all, and what the criteria is for it.
With your anecdote, I submit people are going to the ER because that's what they know. Without more information about their plans, coverage, and knowledge....it trivial to call it abuse. Also, when you say "tons", I'm not inclined to go along with it. 5? 10? 20?
What we do know is that insurers are always looking for ways to maximize profits, and this seemingly simple change has abuse written all over it. Not plebian abuse, but insurer abuse.
Headache? denied, we know we know....could have been something serious, but it wasnt
Cut yourself? denied, wasn't serious enough to be life threatening, you suture it yourself next time
Sports injury? xray's are clear, can still walk on it, denied....hope it's nothing serious, so sorry.
Fell down? Nothing broken, just soft tissue damage, suck it up buttercup, denied.
Breathing Trouble? denied, it's spring ya dummy! take care of those allergies yourself next time, when you can't breathe, alone in your home...and btw EMS ride denied also.
the list goes on and on.