Best Winamp version

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
D

DarkTXKnight

Senior member
Oct 3, 2001
933
0
71
What is the best version of Winamp to stick with??? I notice a lot of folks love the 2.x versions and some others go for 5.x. I dont really have an interest in the video capabilities I just want to use this for my audio files and radio.

Thanks a bunch
 
S

Sid59

Lifer
Sep 2, 2002
11,879
3
81
people stayed with the 2.xx version because they have crappy computers to run the 5.xx or they didn't like the 'bloat' features.

it's always been preference to be "anti" bloat. If anyone says they can consistently hear an audible difference playing their mp3s from winamp 2.xx and 5.xx is making it up.
 
J

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
I still use 2.9x but that's only because I don't need or want the extra features. Same reason I use Foxit over Adobe Reader. But if you want the extra features then version 5.x is the way to go.
 
I

imported_Stewy

Member
Apr 7, 2006
157
0
0
2.81 FTW! It has all the features I'll ever need. If I want to play a video, I'll use one of the numerous video players I have on my computer, not the program that I use to play music with. Plus, 2.81 is the last version in the 2.xx line that I know of which has what I call the 'soft fade' feature when you hit the pause button, and it's something I really like for some reason.
 
IHateMyJob2004

IHateMyJob2004

Lifer
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
I use this thing called foobar. It's all you need. It's audio for god sakes. Why people waste there time with winamp anymore ... ???
 
C

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
5,669
769
126
I use 5.08e without the modern skin support, so it looks pretty much the same as the older 2.xx versions.
 
J

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
I use this thing called foobar. It's all you need. It's audio for god sakes. Why people waste there time with winamp anymore ... ???
Click to expand...

FWIW Winamp w/ Otachan's plugins sounds the same as foobar (which I also use). Shoutcast is another nice feature of Winamp. The default foobar interface is clumsy, and you need to spend some time tweaking it columns, album art, and other assorted plugins.
 
Jeff7

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: Sid59
people stayed with the 2.xx version because they have crappy computers to run the 5.xx or they didn't like the 'bloat' features.

it's always been preference to be "anti" bloat. If anyone says they can consistently hear an audible difference playing their mp3s from winamp 2.xx and 5.xx is making it up.
Click to expand...

Set it to use the classic skin. It loads much quicker and should do fine on older systems.
 
Gooberlx2

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
2.xx for an absolutely simple player + no bloat.

5.xx for a still streamlined player, with additonal functions like library, cd burning, etc...
 
Gooberlx2

Gooberlx2

Lifer
May 4, 2001
15,381
6
91
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
I use this thing called foobar. It's all you need. It's audio for god sakes. Why people waste there time with winamp anymore ... ???
Click to expand...

Because foobar is so damn overly complicated for your average user. It's like the linux of audio players for God's sake!

I do use it, however, for its various tools (fixing VBR headers, replaygain, etc...)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom