Best Rice Cooker

Status
Not open for further replies.

polarmystery

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,907
8
81
I've been looking for a decent rice cooker that will cook both white and brown rice, but I don't know what I'm looking for. I'd probably spend upwards of $150 if it's of good quality. However, I'm completely ignorant to brand and functionality. Anybody have any info/feedback?

Cheers.
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,536
3
0
Gourmet+Reserved+Stainless+Steel+10%22+Non-Stick+Skillet.jpg


Splatter-Screen.jpg


Vollrath-69040-Stainless-Steel-4-Quart-Mixing-Bowl-3538_xlarge.jpg


Shouldn't cost more than $10.00.

http://shesimmers.com/2012/08/how-to-cook-sticky-rice-the-easy-way-and-without-a-steamer.html
 

dabuddha

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
19,579
17
81
http://www.amazon.com/Zojirushi-NS-Z...hi+rice+cooker

Is the one I got. I used to think these were such a waste of money but holy crap I love mine. It comes out perfect everytime and the warming function keeps the rice warm for hours on end without drying it out. I also like how I can schedule the rice to cook. I set mine to be ready at 7:00pm so that by the time I get home, I've got hot rice waiting for me.
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,536
3
0
You guys understand "rice cookers" are literally a metal bowl sitting on a hot plate with a timer glued on some cheap plastic, right?
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,536
3
0
Well that cheapo rice cooker is nice because I don't need to waste stove space when I'm cooking other stuff. Just toss the rice in there and forget it. :p

I guess I can see that point. I don't usually have all five burners going on my stove though.
 

polarmystery

Diamond Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,907
8
81
I guess I can see that point. I don't usually have all five burners going on my stove though.

This is also my problem. I need the stove space.

And yes, I eat a lot of rice. I guess $150 is too much?

Edit: Saw the links to other cookers, maybe that's in the right ballpark.
 
Last edited:
Oct 20, 2005
10,978
44
91
This is also my problem. I need the stove space.

And yes, I eat a lot of rice. I guess $150 is too much?

Edit: Saw the links to other cookers, maybe that's in the right ballpark.

$150 is waaaaaaay too much.

Don't spend more than like $30. Even fancier ones aren't anywhere near $150, maybe $50.
 

PenguinPower

Platinum Member
Apr 15, 2002
2,538
15
81
http://www.amazon.com/Zojirushi-NS-Z...hi+rice+cooker

Is the one I got. I used to think these were such a waste of money but holy crap I love mine. It comes out perfect everytime and the warming function keeps the rice warm for hours on end without drying it out. I also like how I can schedule the rice to cook. I set mine to be ready at 7:00pm so that by the time I get home, I've got hot rice waiting for me.

This is what I have as well. Absolutely love it.
 

NetWareHead

THAT guy
Aug 10, 2002
5,854
154
106
I heard Zojirushi is an excellent yet expensive brand of rice cookers. They have lots of features that can be used for more than just cooking rice.
 

Zivic

Diamond Member
Nov 25, 2002
3,505
38
91
This is also my problem. I need the stove space.

And yes, I eat a lot of rice. I guess $150 is too much?

Edit: Saw the links to other cookers, maybe that's in the right ballpark.

I picked up this one for myself:
http://www.amazon.com/Zojirushi-NP-H...ords=Zojirushi

it is worth it IMHO... well, if it is still working 5 yrs down the road it will be.

if you are comfortable spending 150, it isn't too much.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81

mvbighead

Diamond Member
Apr 20, 2009
3,793
1
81
If you're just looking for "regular rice" all you need is:

cuisinart-multiclad-unlimited-2-qt.-saucepan-with-lid.jpg


12055716876828p.jpg


Less than $10.

You don't need that contraption. Rice is so cheap and so simple. No need to complicate it.

http://www.thekitchn.com/how-to-cook-rice-on-the-stove-44333

That method is going to give you spotty results, especially when you vary your rice types.

I have made quite a bit of rice over the last couple years, and I never get restaurant quality sticky rice, especially not with the 2:1 ratio. I'm to the point now that I am ready to try some method of steaming, whether an "actual" rice cooker or just some concoction to make it happen on the stove.

But boiling water and putting rice directly in the water does not give consistent, quality, restaurant style rice. For what it is worth, last night I cooked some Costco Organic Brown Rice, 2 cups rice, 4 cups water (per their instructions, they suggested 5 cups of water). A pinch of salt, and tsp of butter. I had about 1/2" of water in the bottom of the pan after 40 minutes, and I popped the lid off a couple times to let the steam out so it would be less watery. It was just clumpy, nasty looking rice. It tasted pretty blah as well. Not at all what I would consider good.

I am willing to bet that some method of steaming is going to produce far more consistent results as the water isn't soaking the rice.
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,536
3
0
That method is going to give you spotty results, especially when you vary your rice types.

I have made quite a bit of rice over the last couple years, and I never get restaurant quality sticky rice, especially not with the 2:1 ratio. I'm to the point now that I am ready to try some method of steaming, whether an "actual" rice cooker or just some concoction to make it happen on the stove.

But boiling water and putting rice directly in the water does not give consistent, quality, restaurant style rice. For what it is worth, last night I cooked some Costco Organic Brown Rice, 2 cups rice, 4 cups water (per their instructions, they suggested 5 cups of water). A pinch of salt, and tsp of butter. I had about 1/2" of water in the bottom of the pan after 40 minutes, and I popped the lid off a couple times to let the steam out so it would be less watery. It was just clumpy, nasty looking rice. It tasted pretty blah as well. Not at all what I would consider good.

I am willing to bet that some method of steaming is going to produce far more consistent results as the water isn't soaking the rice.

Inconsistent results? I've been cooking rice for 25 years, it's not hard at all. Heat, rice, water, fat, salt. That's it. Simple.

The method you quoted is not for cooking sticky rice. My first post was sticky rice, see that.
 

SheHateMe

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2012
7,251
20
81
I like steamed rice, not boiled rice.

Thats why I use Rice cookers.


I suck at making Rice and I'm not afraid to admit it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chefsdreams
Status
Not open for further replies.