• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Best graphics card for around $250

I would like to run Cryis at very high settings at 1680x1050 if possible. What would be the best graphics card to do that?



The OP has made his decision, so there's no need to continue arguing about nitty gritty details, or features that the OP has expressed a lack of interest in.

AmberClad
Video Moderator
 
The 4850X2 2GB is $280 w/ free shipping at NewEgg and has a $25 MIR, bringing the final price to $265.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814102809

Probably the best bang for your buck in the $250-$300 price range. Definitely get the 2 GB version though. It has 2 GB of VRAM but it can only actually use 1 GB (each GPU has 1 GB and it's a dual-GPU card). The 1 GB version is powerful but effectively has 512 MB of VRAM, which is very limiting for such a fast card.
 
XFX 4890 faster than GTX275 in most of AT benches, OC's like a monster, comes with 4GB flash drive, XFX lifetime warranty $230AR. Nuff said.
 
There are only 3 video cards to choose from in the $250 range....

HD 4850x2
HD 4890
GTX 275

the 4850x2 outperforms the other two but ive heard that crossfire setups can just cause headaches. so u might choose to go with the 4890 or 275
 
Keep in mind that the 4850X2 is a very long card, and the GTX275 (10.5 inches I think) is also longer than the 4890. So make sure your case can accommodate either one before deciding.
 
4850 x2 or 4890...you'll be ok with either one. If going for the x2, try to find reviews that bench the games/engines that you play to evaluate how is scales.
 
Since the OP asked about Crysis in particular-

We started at 1920x1200 with everything set to "Gamer" on the Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2 and our fingers crossed, and the Sapphire fell flat. We lowered it to 1680x1050, and it was still not happening. So then we had to lower some in-game settings. We started with lowering some of the less conspicuous settings like Volumetric Effects, Post-processing, Game Effects, and Particles, but it wasn't enough. We then lowered the Shadows Quality option and that helped a lot, but it was still choppy and unpleasant. Ultimately we had to choose between lowering the Shader Quality or the Texture Quality setting. Our observation was that the Shader Quality setting had a much more dramatic impact on image quality, so we opted to set the Texture Quality option to "Mainstream" to make Crysis: Warhead playable.


Meanwhile, both the Radeon HD 4870 1GB and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 were able to play Crysis: Warhead at 1920x1200 with 16X AF and all in-game settings at "Gamer", but without any level of AA. Between these two video cards, the Radeon HD 4870 1GB gave us slightly better performance, but certainly not enough to declare it a clear winner.

Link.

The 4850x2 would be a flat out bad choice at $200 for the particular task you are asking about, at $300 it is an atrocity. Not saying it is a bad card overall, but it gets spanked by significantly lesser hardware in Crysis.

4890 and GTX 275, 4890 seems to pull slightly higher average, 275 slightly higher peak- both have the same min. Whatever has the better price point between those two would be the way to go for what you are looking for IMO.
 
Originally posted by: Kraeoss
damn i wish i had 300 bucks :S

I remember back in 2006 a 7900 GTX would score like 5000+ in 3Dmark06.

Now even a $75 4670 will do 8000+ at the same 1280x1024 resolution (although with a better CPU)

So if you can settle for less eye-candy there appears to be advantages for waiting till the generation of GPUs change rather than upgrading within the same generation.

Still I would love one day to get a quad SLI just to see what all the fuss is about.
 
I agree with the above in that the HD4850X2 really wouldn't be a good choice for Crysis, so an HD4890 or GTX275 should be a good choice.

And either of them will be able to max out the game, or come very close, at 1680x1050. They also basically perform the same, so just toss a coin as to which one you'll get. Here are some benchmarks with Crysis and Crysis Warhead at 1680x1050:

http://www.techpowerup.com/rev...ercolor/HD_4890/9.html (slight nod to the HD4890)
http://www.computerbase.de/art...schnitt_crysis_warhead (slight nod to the GTX275 with no AA and at playable framerates)
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3517&p=8 (only has the HD4850X2, which performs worse than the GTX280 at 16x10)
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3539&p=17 (GTX275 and HD4890 both outperform the GTX280 at 16x10, slight nod to the HD4890)
http://firingsquad.com/hardwar...orce_gtx_275/page7.asp (slight nod to the HD4890)
http://www.guru3d.com/article/...gtx-275-review-test/14 (nod to the GTX275)
http://www.pcgameshardware.com...TX-275/Reviews/?page=8 (Uh... tie?)
 
Originally posted by: offspringfan23
I think it's going to be between the 4890 and GTX 275, will I be able to get very high to max settings with 1680x1050?

yea you will be very pleased with either of those cards but i would lean towards the 4890.
 
Originally posted by: offspringfan23
Which 4890 and GTX 275 are the best? There are so many brands

For the GTX 275, I'd say EVGA and BFG are two best brands.

For the 4890, XFX I think is the best because you get a double lifetime warranty, meaning if/when you decided to sell your card, the buyer would also get a lifetime warranty.
 
well my personal experience keeps me away from ATI despite wanting to help out the underdog. i just don't want those headaches.
 
Back
Top