Benchmark your computer @4K with Handbrake 1.1 and H265! NOW WITH ZEN3!

[Makaveli]

I thoguht the newer one would return better results.

I guess that would depend on what was done in the newest version, maybe it was only bug fixes and nothing updated to enhance performance?

 

[sdifox]

I guess that would depend on what was done in the newest version, maybe it was only bug fixes and nothing updated to enhance performance?

Gpu rendering was introduced in 1.2 I think

 

[Makaveli]

Gpu rendering was introduced in 1.2 I think

After using the Fast Profile in Ryzen Dram Calculator.
@3200 CL14
encoded 1806 frames in 292.40s (6.18 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

 

[sdifox]

After using the Fast Profile in Ryzen Dram Calculator.
@3200 CL14
encoded 1806 frames in 292.40s (6.18 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

That's more like it

 

[LikeLinus]

Instead of 12 of those cores, imagine 128 of them in one box !!! It would look exactly like this (but mine are generation one of EPYC, not gen 2/7002 series, and twice the cores that I have)

Nice set-up. Why do we need to imagine it? Why not provide actual benchmark results? I'm sure we would all much rather see how it performs. That is sort of the point of this thread!

 

[Markfw]

Nice set-up. Why do we need to imagine it? Why not provide actual benchmark results? I'm sure we would all much rather see how it performs. That is sort of the point of this thread!

Because its running linus. These are windows apps.

 

[LikeLinus]

Because its running linus. These are windows apps.

OK, odd. Not sure what that post provided to the thread. Would rather see how it actually performs. Not a lot of people have dual EPYC cpus here, so it would be nice to see!

It's always easy to throw Win10 onto an SSD to swap it out for testing. Do it!

 

[Markfw]

OK, odd. Not sure what that post provided to the thread. Would rather see how it actually performs. Not a lot of people have dual EPYC cpus here, so it would be nice to see!

It's always easy to throw Win10 onto an SSD to swap it out for testing. Do it!

I don't think it will even run windows 10 with more than 32 cpus.

What it provided to this thread was the power of the new Rome CPUs. The just "imagine part". If windows was able to run it,.

 

[sdifox]

I don't think it will even run windows 10 with more than 32 cpus.

What it provided to this thread was the power of the new Rome CPUs. The just "imagine part". If windows was able to run it,.

even if it does, you won't be able to afford Server 2016 licence...

 

[Markfw]

even if it does, you won't be able to afford Server 2016 licence...

Oh, server 2016 will run it, and I have a trial version of server 2012 r2. Its just a lot of work to prove a point,. My server is busy working.....

 

[LikeLinus]

I don't think it will even run windows 10 with more than 32 cpus.

What it provided to this thread was the power of the new Rome CPUs. The just "imagine part". If windows was able to run it,.

Windows 10 Server will run up to 256 cores (64 bit). They have an 180 day trial version that you can even re-activate up to 4-5 times.

As far as it showing the thread the "power" of the Rome CPU, is a bit odd because it provided nothing in regards to performance. It was a simple photo?

 

[sdifox]

Oh, server 2016 will run it, and I have a trial version of server 2012 r2. Its just a lot of work to prove a point,. My server is busy working.....

did you cost the licence? that is what I am talking about, it will cost more than the hardware. It is by core count.

 

[LikeLinus]

Oh, server 2016 will run it, and I have a trial version of server 2012 r2. Its just a lot of work to prove a point,. My server is busy working.....

What is your server running? Is it mission critical? The Windows Server install is less than an hour. It would just be very nice to see the actual results.

 

[Markfw]

Well, I downloaded the trial version of server 2019. Tomorrow I will try and find a spare ssd, and install it.

 

[Markfw]

OK, I tried to install server 2019 eval, and it said loading files, then I saw the windows 10 "window" for a few seconds, then it rebooted. Sorry, not spending any more time on this.

 

[Hitman928]

OK, I tried to install server 2019 eval, and it said loading files, then I saw the windows 10 "window" for a few seconds, then it rebooted. Sorry, not spending any more time on this.

Wouldn't matter anyway, Handbrake doesn't scale to anywhere near that many cores/threads. You start to have severely diminishing returns after about 12 cores and plateau somewhere around 16 - 20 at best.

You could, however, run multiple transcodes at the same time which would make batch processing go pretty darn fast.

 

[Bavor]

HandBrake 1.1.0 (2018040700) - 64bit
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18363.0 - 64bit
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core Processor
Ram: 32685 MB,
GPU Information:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 - 26.21.14.4187

encoded 1806 frames in 169.73s (10.64 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

3950X PBO+200
32GB DDR4 3600 MHz
WIndows 10 Pro
Files were on a 2TB Micron SATA III SSD if that matters

Same test on the latest version of Handbrake(1.3):
encoded 1806 frames in 180.53s (10.00 fps), 16285.42 kb/s, Avg QP:28.61

 

[DrMrLordX]

Seems like 1.3 is a little slower?

 

[Makaveli]

Seems like 1.3 is a little slower?

Looks so I will test again both versions when I get home.

 

[Junky228]

My original test was actually with 1.3 I'll copy them here for reference :>
encoded 1806 frames in 886.67s (2.04 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

I tested just now with 1.1.0 like I should have from the beginning and got :>encoded 1806 frames in 902.22s (2.00 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

So at least in my case 1.3 was slightly faster. running xeon w3670 @ oc'd 4GHz turbo with 24GB 1600mhz ddr3 9-9-9-24

I don't have a spare ssd to test if drive speed makes a difference in encoding times, but this was done on a 2.5" hdd in my system

***or there could just be a fair bit of variance between tests...I wonder if it might improve too if I lock my CPU to 4GHz rather than letting it turbo up to 4GHz under load and drop below baseclock when idle...

 

[Hulk]

Had some time waiting on my car today.

Rank	User	CPU	GHz	seconds	fps	GHz/fps	Architecture
1	DaPoets	3960X 24/48	?	123.66​	14.60​		Zen+
2	Bavor	3950x 16/32	?	169.73​	10.64​		Zen 2
3	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	10.38​	0.385​	Broadwell
4	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	9.37​	0.426​	Broadwell
5	DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.1​	198.75​	9.09​	0.451​	Zen 2
6	rvborgh	Quad Opteron (48xK10)	3​	200​	9.03​	0.332​	?
7	Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.4​	211​	8.56​	0.397​	Skylake
8	Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.1​	216.35​	8.35​	0.491​	Zen+
9	Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.8​	242.49​	7.45​	0.510​	Zen
10	mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.7​	253.41​	7.13​	0.519​	Haswell
11	eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.1​	254.04​	7.11​	0.577​	Zen
12	Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.5​	275.66​	6.55​	0.534​	Piledriver
13	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.9​	281.8​	6.41​	0.765​	Coffee Lake
14	kmm0000	9900k 8/16	3.6​	290.96​	6.21​	0.580​	Coffee Lake
15	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.7​	291.87​	6.19​	0.760​	Coffee Lake
16	TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2​	297.54​	6.07​	0.330​	Skylake SP
17	sdifox	3700x 8/16	?	306.52​	5.89​		Zen 2
18	Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5​	311.03​	5.81​	0.861​	Coffee Lake
19	Makaveli	3800x 8/16	?	313.61​	5.76​		Zen 2
20	XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.7​	319.84​	5.65​	0.832​	Haswell
21	DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.5​	320.75​	5.63​	0.799​	Skylake
22	epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5​	340.42​	5.31​	0.942​	Coffee Lake
23	JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.8​	342.38​	5.27​	0.910​	Coffee Lake
24	mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.8​	347.5​	5.20​	0.924​	Coffee Lake
25	IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.7​	359.41​	5.02​	0.935​	Coffee Lake
26	CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.9​	379.09​	4.76​	1.029​	Coffee Lake
27	cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.7​	386.65​	4.67​	1.006​	Coffee Lake
28	rgba	8700 8/16	4.3​	387.57​	4.66​	0.923​	Coffee Lake
29	Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.5​	394.29​	4.58​	0.546​	Broadwell
30	Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.1​	404.44​	4.47​	0.918​	Zen+
31	Dan057	Ryzen 2700 8/16	?	410.08​	4.40​		Zen+
32	lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4​	414.34​	4.36​	0.918​	Zen+
33	.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.95​	416.04​	4.34​	0.910​	Zen
34	pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.9​	416.47​	4.34​	0.669​	Sandy Bridge EP
35	Bburninatortech4	2700x 8/16	?	423.9​	4.26​		Zen+
36	Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.8​	429.95​	4.20​	0.905​	Zen+
37	.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.8​	430.69​	4.19​	0.906​	Zen
38	AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.1​	430.94​	4.19​	0.978​	Zen+
39	richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.7​	434.68​	4.15​	0.891​	Zen
40	CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.8​	440.29​	4.10​	0.926​	Zen+
41	Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.9​	444.03​	4.07​	0.959​	Zen
42	dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.7​	476.9​	3.79​	0.977​	Zen
43	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.6​	519.91​	3.47​	1.036​	Zen
44	mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.2​	520.3​	3.47​	1.210​	Zen+
45	ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4​	558.91​	3.23​	1.238​	Coffee Lake
46	ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4​	562.68​	3.21​	1.246​	Coffee Lake
47	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.6​	577.26​	3.13​	1.151​	Zen
48	gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.5​	593.1​	3.05​	1.149​	Zen
49	CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.5​	644.52​	2.80​	1.606​	Haswell
50	jones377	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	768.63​	2.35​	1.660​	Haswell
51	Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8 core	3.5​	775.24​	2.33​	1.502​	Haswell
52	Hulk	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	788.6463​	2.29​	1.703​	Haswell
53	Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4​	886.67​	2.04​	1.964​	Westmere EP
54	Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.5​	951.72​	1.90​	2.371​	Sandy Bridge
55	Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.2​	1022.42​	1.77​	1.812​	Kaby Lake
56	NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	1.62​	2.574​	Piledriver
57	mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.8​	1399.56​	1.29​	2.945​	Ivy Bridge
58	dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.6​	1586.81​	1.14​	3.163​	Ivy Bridge
59	Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.8​	2012.8​	0.90​	3.121​	Lynnfield
60	Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.8​	2631.13​	0.69​	4.079​	Goldmont Plus
61	PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.2​	2655.1​	0.68​	4.704​	Yorkfield
62	ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.1​	3144.79​	0.57​	5.398​	Ivy Bridge
63	Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3​	3439.2​	0.53​	5.713​	Yorkfield
64	dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.2​	5099.43​	0.35​	6.212​	Apollo Lake
65	dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.4​	6027.14​	0.30​	4.672​	Haswell

 

[Hulk]

Here's the chart sorted with a metric I think is interesting. Sorted from most efficient by cores and frequency to least efficient. You'll notice that generally similar architectures are grouped together. It starts to fall apart past 12 or so cores because Handbrake isn't scaling linearly.
There are some outliers. I don't think some people reported frequency that their CPU was actually running at during the test. If corrections are posted I'll update the data.

The Zen core is very good with this test.

User	CPU	GHz	seconds	fps	GHz/fps x #cores	Architecture
kmm0000	9900k 8/16	3.6​	290.96​	6.21​	4.640​	Coffee Lake
richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.7​	434.68​	4.15​	5.343​	Zen
DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.1​	198.75​	9.09​	5.414​	Zen 2
.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.8​	430.69​	4.19​	5.437​	Zen
.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.95​	416.04​	4.34​	5.460​	Zen
lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4​	414.34​	4.36​	5.506​	Zen+
Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.9​	444.03​	4.07​	5.753​	Zen
dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.7​	476.9​	3.79​	5.862​	Zen
Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8 core	3.5​	775.24​	2.33​	6.010​	Haswell
CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.7​	291.87​	6.19​	6.077​	Coffee Lake
CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.9​	281.8​	6.41​	6.117​	Coffee Lake
William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.6​	519.91​	3.47​	6.218​	Zen
DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.5​	320.75​	5.63​	6.394​	Skylake
CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.5​	644.52​	2.80​	6.424​	Haswell
TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2​	297.54​	6.07​	6.590​	Skylake SP
jones377	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	768.63​	2.35​	6.639​	Haswell
XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.7​	319.84​	5.65​	6.659​	Haswell
Hulk	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	788.6463​	2.29​	6.812​	Haswell
Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5​	311.03​	5.81​	6.889​	Coffee Lake
gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.5​	593.1​	3.05​	6.897​	Zen
William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.6​	577.26​	3.13​	6.904​	Zen
Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.4​	211​	8.56​	7.150​	Skylake
Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.8​	429.95​	4.20​	7.237​	Zen+
Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.2​	1022.42​	1.77​	7.246​	Kaby Lake
mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.2​	520.3​	3.47​	7.260​	Zen+
JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.8​	342.38​	5.27​	7.280​	Coffee Lake
Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.1​	404.44​	4.47​	7.345​	Zen+
rgba	8700 8/16	4.3​	387.57​	4.66​	7.382​	Coffee Lake
mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.8​	347.5​	5.20​	7.389​	Coffee Lake
CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.8​	440.29​	4.10​	7.411​	Zen+
ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4​	558.91​	3.23​	7.427​	Coffee Lake
ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4​	562.68​	3.21​	7.477​	Coffee Lake
IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.7​	359.41​	5.02​	7.483​	Coffee Lake
epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5​	340.42​	5.31​	7.540​	Coffee Lake
Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.5​	394.29​	4.58​	7.641​	Broadwell
AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.1​	430.94​	4.19​	7.827​	Zen+
cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.7​	386.65​	4.67​	8.050​	Coffee Lake
Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.8​	242.49​	7.45​	8.164​	Zen
CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.9​	379.09​	4.76​	8.228​	Coffee Lake
eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.1​	254.04​	7.11​	9.228​	Zen
dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.4​	6027.14​	0.30​	9.344​	Haswell
mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.7​	253.41​	7.13​	9.345​	Haswell
Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.5​	951.72​	1.90​	9.486​	Sandy Bridge
pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.9​	416.47​	4.34​	10.700​	Sandy Bridge EP
ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.1​	3144.79​	0.57​	10.796​	Ivy Bridge
mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.8​	1399.56​	1.29​	11.779​	Ivy Bridge
Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4​	886.67​	2.04​	11.783​	Westmere EP
Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.8​	2012.8​	0.90​	12.482​	Lynnfield
dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.6​	1586.81​	1.14​	12.652​	Ivy Bridge
Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	9.37​	13.621​	Broadwell
Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	10.38​	13.844​	Broadwell
Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.1​	216.35​	8.35​	15.717​	Zen+
Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.8​	2631.13​	0.69​	16.317​	Goldmont Plus
Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.5​	275.66​	6.55​	17.095​	Piledriver
PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.2​	2655.1​	0.68​	18.818​	Yorkfield
NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	1.62​	20.595​	Piledriver
Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3​	3439.2​	0.53​	22.852​	Yorkfield
dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.2​	5099.43​	0.35​	24.848​	Apollo Lake

 

[Hulk]

Would be kind of interesting if someone with a 16 or more core CPU could run the test with 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 cores and plot the results so we can see how Handbrake scales.
It's quite a bit of work though.

 

[Makaveli]

My original test was actually with 1.3 I'll copy them here for reference :>
encoded 1806 frames in 886.67s (2.04 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

I tested just now with 1.1.0 like I should have from the beginning and got :>encoded 1806 frames in 902.22s (2.00 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

So at least in my case 1.3 was slightly faster. running xeon w3670 @ oc'd 4GHz turbo with 24GB 1600mhz ddr3 9-9-9-24

I don't have a spare ssd to test if drive speed makes a difference in encoding times, but this was done on a 2.5" hdd in my system

***or there could just be a fair bit of variance between tests...I wonder if it might improve too if I lock my CPU to 4GHz rather than letting it turbo up to 4GHz under load and drop below baseclock when idle...

The newest version is faster for me also.

1.1.0
encoded 1806 frames in 296.09s (6.10 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

1.3
encoded 1806 frames in 292.40s (6.18 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

 

[Hulk]

Rank	User	CPU	GHz	seconds	fps	GHz/fps	Architecture	GHz/fps x #cores
1	DaPoets	3960X 24/48	?	123.66​	14.60​		Zen 2
2	Bavor	3950x 16/32	?	169.73​	10.64​		Zen 2
3	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	10.38​	0.385​	Broadwell	13.844​
4	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	9.37​	0.426​	Broadwell	13.621​
5	DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.1​	198.75​	9.09​	0.451​	Zen 2	5.414​
6	rvborgh	Quad Opteron (48xK10)	3​	200​	9.03​	0.332​	?	15.947​
7	Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.4​	211​	8.56​	0.397​	Skylake	7.150​
8	Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.1​	216.35​	8.35​	0.491​	Zen+	15.717​
9	Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.8​	242.49​	7.45​	0.510​	Zen	8.164​
10	mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.7​	253.41​	7.13​	0.519​	Haswell	9.345​
11	eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.1​	254.04​	7.11​	0.577​	Zen	9.228​
12	Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.5​	275.66​	6.55​	0.534​	Piledriver	17.095​
13	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.9​	281.8​	6.41​	0.765​	Coffee Lake	6.117​
14	kmm0000	9900k 8/16	3.6​	290.96​	6.21​	0.580​	Coffee Lake	4.640​
15	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.7​	291.87​	6.19​	0.760​	Coffee Lake	6.077​
19	Makaveli	3800x 8/16	4.9	292.4​	6.18​	0.793​	Zen 2	6.347​
16	TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2​	297.54​	6.07​	0.330​	Skylake SP	6.590​
17	sdifox	3700x 8/16	?	306.52​	5.89​		Zen 2
18	Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5​	311.03​	5.81​	0.861​	Coffee Lake	6.889​
20	XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.7​	319.84​	5.65​	0.832​	Haswell	6.659​
21	DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.5​	320.75​	5.63​	0.799​	Skylake	6.394​
22	epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5​	340.42​	5.31​	0.942​	Coffee Lake	7.540​
23	JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.8​	342.38​	5.27​	0.910​	Coffee Lake	7.280​
24	mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.8​	347.5​	5.20​	0.924​	Coffee Lake	7.389​
25	IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.7​	359.41​	5.02​	0.935​	Coffee Lake	7.483​
26	CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.9​	379.09​	4.76​	1.029​	Coffee Lake	8.228​
27	cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.7​	386.65​	4.67​	1.006​	Coffee Lake	8.050​
28	rgba	8700 8/16	4.3​	387.57​	4.66​	0.923​	Coffee Lake	7.382​
29	Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.5​	394.29​	4.58​	0.546​	Broadwell	7.641​
30	Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.1​	404.44​	4.47​	0.918​	Zen+	7.345​
31	Dan057	Ryzen 2700 8/16	?	410.08​	4.40​		Zen+
32	lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4​	414.34​	4.36​	0.918​	Zen+	5.506​
33	.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.95​	416.04​	4.34​	0.910​	Zen	5.460​
34	pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.9​	416.47​	4.34​	0.669​	Sandy Bridge EP	10.700​
35	Bburninatortech4	2700x 8/16	?	423.9​	4.26​		Zen+
36	Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.8​	429.95​	4.20​	0.905​	Zen+	7.237​
37	.vodka	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.8​	430.69​	4.19​	0.906​	Zen	5.437​
38	AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.1​	430.94​	4.19​	0.978​	Zen+	7.827​
39	richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.7​	434.68​	4.15​	0.891​	Zen	5.343​
40	CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.8​	440.29​	4.10​	0.926​	Zen+	7.411​
41	Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.9​	444.03​	4.07​	0.959​	Zen	5.753​
42	dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.7​	476.9​	3.79​	0.977​	Zen	5.862​
43	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.6​	519.91​	3.47​	1.036​	Zen	6.218​
44	mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.2​	520.3​	3.47​	1.210​	Zen+	7.260​
45	ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4​	558.91​	3.23​	1.238​	Coffee Lake	7.427​
46	ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4​	562.68​	3.21​	1.246​	Coffee Lake	7.477​
47	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.6​	577.26​	3.13​	1.151​	Zen	6.904​
48	gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.5​	593.1​	3.05​	1.149​	Zen	6.897​
49	CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.5​	644.52​	2.80​	1.606​	Haswell	6.424​
50	jones377	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	768.63​	2.35​	1.660​	Haswell	6.639​
51	Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8 core	3.5​	775.24​	2.33​	1.502​	Haswell	6.010​
52	Hulk	4770K 4/8 core	3.9​	788.6463​	2.29​	1.703​	Haswell	6.812​
53	Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4​	886.67​	2.04​	1.964​	Westmere EP	11.783​
54	Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.5​	951.72​	1.90​	2.371​	Sandy Bridge	9.486​
55	Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.2​	1022.42​	1.77​	1.812​	Kaby Lake	7.246​
56	Hulk	8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)	2.5​	1067.13​	1.69​	1.477​	Kaby Lake R	5.909​
57	NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	1.62​	2.574​	Piledriver	20.595​
58	mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.8​	1399.56​	1.29​	2.945​	Ivy Bridge	11.779​
59	dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.6​	1586.81​	1.14​	3.163​	Ivy Bridge	12.652​
60	Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.8​	2012.8​	0.90​	3.121​	Lynnfield	12.482​
61	Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.8​	2631.13​	0.69​	4.079​	Goldmont Plus	16.317​
62	PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.2​	2655.1​	0.68​	4.704​	Yorkfield	18.818​
63	ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.1​	3144.79​	0.57​	5.398​	Ivy Bridge	10.796​
64	Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3​	3439.2​	0.53​	5.713​	Yorkfield	22.852​
65	dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.2​	5099.43​	0.35​	6.212​	Apollo Lake	24.848​
66	dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.4​	6027.14​	0.30​	4.672​	Haswell	9.344​