Sheik Yerbouti
Lifer
- Feb 16, 2005
- 14,080
- 5,453
- 136
Rewarding loyalists is part of the cabinet stuffing game. I never expected Trump to make inspired choices. For all his noise about draining the swamp, his choices are about what I have come to expect out of Republicans.
As for appointing you or me, depends on our respective credentials. As I said, Chris Christie would raise an eyebrow. Dr Carson is a curious choice, not an unreasonable one
technically, he was a neurosurgeon, and a pretty excellent one at that. But he still thought the pyramids in egypt were grain silos for joseph, so DERP.of all the people in this country that actually have experience in federal and/or state housing authorities.
Let's give the job to a heart surgeon.
yeah, that makes sense.
Ben really is only qualified to be Surgeon General, and even that's iffy.
This. Now when they start cutting programs people can't blame it on racism.HUD secretary had to be a Trump loyalist and a black, so it was either Carson or Omarosa.
Dr Phil is gonna be pissedI hear that position might be reserved for Dr. Oz.
Ben really is only qualified to be Surgeon General, and even that's iffy.
What I am saying is that eventually some people hit a point in their careers, through experience, education or perspective, that they bring something to the table other than industry specific credentials.Can you explain what sort of credentials are important to you? You already said that you don't find credentials in housing or urban development to be important for housing and urban development, but it seems that you find surgical credentials to be good? I'm not trying to talk shit, I am genuinely confused.
I fear he has a very religious ideology to push, and has been trying to do so for some time.This actually bothers me less than the DeVos, Sessions or Price who just seem to hate America. Ben is an odd duck with some very confusing world views, but he doesn't have as much an axe to grind, agenda to push, or pocket to pad with this appointment.
I fear he has a very religious ideology to push, and has been trying to do so for some time.
yea, that's a pit in my stomach.I understand that. But there's only so much "damage" he can do in the position with that agenda. Unlike DeVos who seemingly wants to promote creationism in public schools...and *IS* in a position that can influence that.
I understand that. But there's only so much "damage" he can do in the position with that agenda. Unlike DeVos who seemingly wants to promote creationism in public schools...and *IS* in a position that can influence that.
Carson in no way is qualified to run the agency other than he supported Trump.
Not sure what other comment to make other than it should be an confirmation hearing..
You clearly do not understand upper management. They set forth direction, and can make/override calls, but they hire the people who live/eat/breathe the subject to act as their advisors. Carson will "run" it, but any CEO knows that it'll be someone else who truly "manages" it.
How will someone such as Carson who has no knowledge or experience in upper management, housing policy, or urban development set an effective direction?
I know, he's got such an amazing record assigning cabinet positions to properly qualified people. Shocking, just shocking.Why wouldn't Trump put Dr. Ben Carson in as Surgeon General instead of HUD where he has absolutely no experience.
You clearly do not understand upper management. They set forth direction, and can make/override calls, but they hire the people who live/eat/breathe the subject to act as their advisors. Carson will "run" it but any CEO knows that it'll be someone else who truly "manages".
I understand that. But there's only so much "damage" he can do in the position with that agenda. Unlike DeVos who seemingly wants to promote creationism in public schools...and *IS* in a position that can influence that.
I'll agree that it's like a "trial by fire" experience, and has more potential than normal to end horribly, but one might argue that's Trump in a nutshell.
HUD sets policy that has an enormous impact on the housing market, particularly the GSE's. It was HUD who decreed that the GSE's would back more "affordable" loans in the run-up to the crash & HUD who promoted the idea that the GSE's should back commercial paper rather than keeping securitization in house.
