Because in the real world, you're talking about benefits that are so infinitesimally small that they don't matter.
We're talking about car and motorcycle batteries that are hooked up to a charger intermittently and, at most for a few months over winter. This is not in any way comparable to the usage patterns of a UPS and the fact that you are comparing the two illustrates that you're not comprehending how the real world works.
Look, even if those were your habits, having a temperature compensated, desulfating battery charger on the battery for 3 months out of every year would do a lot of good to your battery. It's nice that you think things don't matter but if you keep a battery for a long time, it absolutely does matter. You just have absolutely no idea what's going on inside of a battery when you charge a battery in sub optimal conditions.
Because, despite your claims, I get 6-10 years out of my batteries when using a simple, non-temperature-compensated float charger. The shortest lifespan I've ever gotten was 5 years on an old, unsealed basic motorcycle battery that I didn't even use distilled water in when topping it up.
So why is the lifespan of your batteries so varied? Is it because your usage habits vary? Different motorcycle? Different temperature conditions? Oh it's because you think you got a "cheap" battery, right? Well you don't know do you, because you don't care yet you care enough to exclaim "in the real world"... In YOUR world, you aren't paying attention and if something fails prematurely, you don't know why, just that you're going to have to replace something now. The Batteryminder 1500 can be purchased for $48 with free ship right now, I bought 2 of them for $43 out the door when Northern Tool had a sale going on with coupon. Why even argue over this shit when you're wrong. If you want to extract maximum life and possibly reverse previous damage you've done by charging in sub-optimal conditions, then using a 4 stage, desulfating, temp compensated battery charger is the way to go. PERIOD. The company that sells the Battery Tender Jr. also sells a temp compensated plus model, knowing full well that temp compensation matters but that it's a more expensive feature.
If your claims were correct, I would not be seeing those lifespans. For the application specified by the OP, which is hooking up a car battery to a float charger for, at most, a couple weeks at a time, temperature compensation and desulfation modes are wholly unnecessary.
Why is it wholly unnecessary? OP has an issue of his batteries not lasting as long as he needs them to. Believe it or not ZV, the minute you leave a battery at less than full charge, sulfation begins to form, hopefully most of it will be reversed upon charging. If we're trying to help OP get more life out of his battery, and I'm giving suggestion of a device that has a proven track record of working, and that device is reasonably priced, then why argue? The Battery Tender jr. is an inferior device for the reasons I pointed out.
Oh and btw,
if the OP is going to charge the battery right after driving a hot car with a hot battery, having temperature comp is absolutely necessary, though you'll need to attach an external temp probe directly to the battery as the 1500's probe is only near the charger (it can be swapped out).
You can't extend the life of a lead acid battery until you address the issues that are causing the battery to age, whether that be grid corrosion due to higher than necessary charge voltage or sulfation due to insufficient charge/charging voltage. If the battery is sulfated which in most cases, it is, then you need to reverse those effects.
Op's issue is most likely a sulfation problem, something that is caused by under charge. It would appear that he will be charging this battery regularly. Since the "real world" as you love to say are basically sub optimal conditions, then you should have no problem with the recommendation of a temp compensated charger as that helps compensate for "real world conditions".
See above. We're not talking about "grid-connected" batteries. We're not talking about industrial UPS applications. We're not talking about instances where batteries are kept on a charger for, at most, a few months.
If these chargers were truly killing batteries, my motorcycle batteries wouldn't be lasting as long as they do.
I don't know where you got the idea that I throw my batteries away after 5 years. I said that's the typical lifespan people report for their motorcycle batteries. Motorcycle batteries are small, and most motorcycle charging systems are weak (many can't actually charge the battery below 1,500-2,000 RPM). Motorcycle batteries are extremely sensitive to over/under charging and they have very little reserve capacity; if they're not in tip top shape, your bike doesn't start.
Keeping a lead acid battery less than topped up for about a week at a time, done many times over the life of the battery will lead to the premature death of that battery. Shit, even keeping that battery not topped up continuously will lead to its premature failure, that's a fact. If owners of motorcycles kept their batteries on the best chargers available on the market, they could get 20 years out of their batteries no problem. 20 years is sort of rare but it's possible with appropriate care, something someone such as yourself is clearly incapable of... But again, in the real world, people abuse their batteries and replace them quite frequently due neglect.
If you use an inferior battery charger in suboptimal conditions, you're basically killing your battery. Your line of thinking is the reason that battery tenders that cook batteries are still on the market. I mean yes, you could use a Battery Tender Jr. properly by ensuring the room temperature does not change and that the float charge voltage is matched with appropriate room temperature, but knowing you, you won't.
http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/sulfation_and_how_to_prevent_it
That's an excellent resource but I think you took this quote a bit out of context:
Several companies offer anti-sulfation devices that apply pulses to the battery terminals to prevent and reverse sulfation. Such technologies tend to lower sulfation on a healthy battery but they cannot effectively reverse the condition once present. Manufacturers offering these devices take the one size fits all approach and the method is unscientific. A random service of pulsing or blindly applying an overcharge can harm the battery in promoting grid corrosion. Technologies are being developed that measure the level of sulfation and apply a calculated overcharge to dissolve the crystals. Chargers featuring this technique only apply de-sulfation if sulfation is present and only for the time needed.
The site isn't necessarily saying the devices are bad but that there isn't enough science being applied to what these battery pulsers do and that a more measured, scientific approach can and should be applied to batteries. The Battery Minder 1500 also doesn't overcharge its batteries which in the past was something that was done to attempt to reverse sulfation. If I remember correctly, the company that hosts "battery university" sells expensive/advanced devices which are suppose to be able to measure battery sulfation through various techniques if there is any in the battery. I can't speak to efficacy of the devices the company sells but obviously there is room for improvement in the field of analyzing battery life and doing battery maintenance.
This is the internet, so, billionaire rock star. It's exactly as credible as your claim to be a competent mechanic.
ZV
Yeah well your hokey approach to things has given me this impression of you:
A bit of a hyperbole but the fact remains that you're just flat out wrong. "In the real world..." yes in the real world things are sub optimal, we have people that buy crappy battery chargers and people such as your self who don't know nor care. There is obviously room for improvement to the temp comp. desulfating battery chargers but right now, from what I know, the BM1500 is the best solution on the market at a reasonable price so it would be unreasonable to recommend anything but.
Hey BUTCH1, don't listen to ZV anyway, his advice about float charging batteries is limited to motorcycles. His circumstances are different enough from yours to where his limited knowledge and inferior advice would be detrimental to your circumstances. I actually have cars that are driven infrequently and so I use something like this
and use my Batteryminder 1500 charger on it when the car isn't being driven...
If you follow ZV's advice, what you will end up with is a battery with heavy grid corrosion AND sulfation.