- Jul 24, 2003
- 42
- 0
- 0
the 2600 333 is 10 dollars more than the 2500 barton, i know that the barton is a good oc cpu, i was just wondering if the 2600 333 is as good?
Originally posted by: SemperFi
All 2500's are 333 but not all 2500's are bartons. I think the only difference is the cache. That is your price difference.
Originally posted by: SemperFi
All 2500's are 333 but not all 2500's are bartons. I think the only difference is the cache. That is your price difference.
Originally posted by: huesmann
Why is the 2500 better than the 2600?
Originally posted by: milldakill
you may be right but i got this off of price watch
$90 - Athlon XP 2500
$88 Athlon XP 2500 333q]
Retail
OEM
respectively.
Originally posted by: MonkeyDriveExpress
<a class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.amd.com/us-en/0,,3715_9259,00.html" target=blank>Athlon XP 2300+ page</A>...apparently AMD gave eMachines an exclusive processor...(wtf are they thinking?!)
Originally posted by: MatthewF01
Originally posted by: milldakill
you may be right but i got this off of price watch
$90 - Athlon XP 2500
$88 Athlon XP 2500 333q]
Retail
OEM
respectively.
Pricewatch takes alot of its info from how things are listed, so if some sites list their XP2500 as just that and another bunch of sites list it as XP2500 with 333fsb,
then there may be two listings when in fact it is the same chip.
