Originally posted by: alphatarget1
I'm surprised how far he went in attacking McCain.
No specifics as usual. It sounds good to many people I'm sure, but it has no substance.
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
All I heard was, 'higher taxes, higher taxes'.
You hear what you want to hear.
Originally posted by: Viditor
Originally posted by: brencat
Yes, some things are sacred. I'm happily married with two kids. What about my rights not to have "marriage" watered down by gays wishing to force their twisted thinking upon society under some B.S. discrimination argument and in the process uprooting centuries of tradition as well as natural law? No thanks.Originally posted by: Dari
You should be ashamed of yourself for denying to others what you have.
And I already mentioned earlier that I am totally okay with civil unions which provide nearly all legal rights of marriage without the "trophy" to dangle in front of society.
I guess I just don't get it...
What does "watered down" mean in this context? Is it like outlawing NASCAR because it waters down "real" race driving?![]()
I loath the idea of someone like you being able to tell others how to live their lives.Originally posted by: brencat
And I loathe the idea of having to explain to my son and daughter why two men or two women on a park bench are sucking face or frolicking around in the park in public like a normal man+woman would do. Similarly, I loathe the idea that a gay "married" couple may eventually be able to adopt children as well as a society where a significant percentage of people might accept having two mommies or two daddies as being "normal."Originally posted by: Viditor
Edit: To be clear, I'm not gay and don't wish to have a same-sex partner...that said, I loathe the idea of owning a pink car as well, but I have no objection if my neighbor has one.
Originally posted by: brencat
Heh. Surprised it took this long for one of you to ask that.Originally posted by: aphex
Just out of curiosity - What if one of your kids turns out to be gay?
My answer is they will be loved as much as any parent can give a child. That said, they will be encouraged -- rather sternly in fact -- to lead a life of chastity. If not, they'd better keep it in the fvcking closet where I can't see it.
That's why Moral Interventionists like brencat are called the "American Taliban"Originally posted by: Hafen
Originally posted by: brencat
Heh. Surprised it took this long for one of you to ask that.Originally posted by: aphex
Just out of curiosity - What if one of your kids turns out to be gay?
My answer is they will be loved as much as any parent can give a child. That said, they will be encouraged -- rather sternly in fact -- to lead a life of chastity. If not, they'd better keep it in the fvcking closet where I can't see it.
Nice, sounds like a future suicide. And I mean that will all honesty, seriousness and experience.
I think straight people need to get their house in order before they dare tell anyone else how to live. All these people cheating on their wives, McCain, Edwards, Ted Haggart, Clinton, Gingrich, Larry Craig.. they are the ones making a mockery of marriage.
Better yet self-righteous tightassed straights should just STFU and worry about themselves. If you want to tell people how to live, go join the Taliban and move to Pakistan. America means freedom for eveyone.
Originally posted by: brencat
It's very simple. Man+woman can procreate. Two men or two women cannot NATURALLY conceive. Same as in the animal world.Originally posted by: Viditor
Sorry, but which "Natural Law" does that violate?
At the end of the day, ALL mariage goes against "Natural Law"...meaning that marriage is a function of culture and is not part of any inherent instinct.
Traditional marriage serves to provide societal order as well as to continue the human race. Virtually all studies show children grow best when they have mommy and daddy around (mommy=female, daddy=male, lest there be any confusion).
Now I'm waiting for one of the loonies here to reply, "well, then should we disallow a traditional couple to marry if they don't want to have children??!" To which my answer will be, "No dipshits. But at least they are in harmony with natural law and have that capability should they choose."
Originally posted by: brencat
And I loathe the idea of having to explain to my son and daughter why two men or two women on a park bench are sucking face or frolicking around in the park in public like a normal man+woman would do. Similarly, I loathe the idea that a gay "married" couple may eventually be able to adopt children as well as a society where a significant percentage of people might accept having two mommies or two daddies as being "normal."Originally posted by: Viditor
Edit: To be clear, I'm not gay and don't wish to have a same-sex partner...that said, I loathe the idea of owning a pink car as well, but I have no objection if my neighbor has one.
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.
Originally posted by: lupi
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.
Maybe you should post that one more time Casiotech, I'm sure it was just a forum fluke that everyone reading the thread missed it the other times you did.
Of course that's not nearly as fun as listening to the hypocritical band wagon going on here. Yes, we really need more guys hanging around together lip locking at the park. Especially since many of the my way or the highway tunnel vission hacks engaged in this discussions would be the very first ones crying like some boogy man just ripped them away from their mothers wet nipple if some priest was standing in the opposite corner of the same park reading aloud verses from the bible.
As for the speech, just about every one on both sides discussed beforehand that to finally start and swinging more of the independents and disgruntled clinton supporters that he would finally have to start hitting specifics. Excluding Olbermann and JP whom are still undergoing their personal revelation from witnessing the ressurection of their christ, we had another standard fare of much grandstanding with an empty delivery. Won't be till later today when all the talking heads have a chance to, but I'd expect a decent majority to discuss what wasn't present in the speach.
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.
McCain stole the "C" from the OP; he needed it to call his wife a wise and beautiful woman.
Originally posted by: winnar111
Obama receives no poll bounce
Text
Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama successfully used his convention speech to lay out the stakes for the November election and draw a contrast with Republican John McCain, though he may receive little or no bounce in the polls, the Democratic nominee's chief strategist said.
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: winnar111
Obama receives no poll bounce
Text
Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama successfully used his convention speech to lay out the stakes for the November election and draw a contrast with Republican John McCain, though he may receive little or no bounce in the polls, the Democratic nominee's chief strategist said.
*whisper* that's called downplaying expectations.
"Obama sees convention bounce"
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What are going to be the "specifics" in McCain's speech next week?
"I'm a PEE-OHH-DUBYA..."
"My five years in a VEE-ATE-NAM-EASE prison camp..."
"My friends, it's time for some STRATE talk..."
"There will be MOHR wars..."
If some of you are praying your lord-and-savior John McBush will bring specifics next week, don't hold your breath.
You know I agree with you on pretty much all the important issues, but McCain doesn't have a southern accent. You seem to be mocking Bush more than McCain. Be fair.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: ZOOYUKA
What was the deal about gays and lesbians not being able to visit there partners in the hospital?
it's true, they can't if they're not married... but obama doesn't support gay marriage.
Heck no, the Koran takes a poor view of that kind of stuff.
Come on that's was funny .Originally posted by: Taejin
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What are going to be the "specifics" in McCain's speech next week?
"I'm a PEE-OHH-DUBYA..."
"My five years in a VEE-ATE-NAM-EASE prison camp..."
"My friends, it's time for some STRATE talk..."
"There will be MOHR wars..."
If some of you are praying your lord-and-savior John McBush will bring specifics next week, don't hold your breath.
You know I agree with you on pretty much all the important issues, but McCain doesn't have a southern accent. You seem to be mocking Bush more than McCain. Be fair.
Be fair? Oh really? I think a more objective third party could say something like that, but you?
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: ZOOYUKA
What was the deal about gays and lesbians not being able to visit there partners in the hospital?
it's true, they can't if they're not married... but obama doesn't support gay marriage.
Heck no, the Koran takes a poor view of that kind of stuff.
Kindly shut up.