Barak Obama's speech

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TechAZ

Golden Member
Sep 8, 2007
1,188
0
71
Good to see the man above the rhetoric, above the lies, above the character of other politicians flat out lies and acts like nobody watching has seen the interview with that religious guy a couple weeks ago.
 

whistleclient

Platinum Member
Apr 22, 2001
2,700
1
71
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
I'm surprised how far he went in attacking McCain.

No specifics as usual. It sounds good to many people I'm sure, but it has no substance.

Actually he mentioned a lot of specifics. Of course it's a Catch 22. If he spent 2 hours giving out facts, figures, percentages, & dollar amounts you'd claim it's dry, boring, uninspiring, and change the channel. More often than not the purpose of a speech is to convey an emotion and inspire a direction of action. Did JFK lay out his 47 point plan for supporting West Berlin or did he simply say, "Ich bin ein Berliner"?
 

Farang

Lifer
Jul 7, 2003
10,913
3
0
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: tangent1138
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
All I heard was, 'higher taxes, higher taxes'.

You hear what you want to hear.

Funny, since Obama's platform calls for tax *cuts* for most. While I disagree with him because I'd like to see deficit reduction, they can be paid for out of cutting Bush spending.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Viditor
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: Dari
You should be ashamed of yourself for denying to others what you have.
Yes, some things are sacred. I'm happily married with two kids. What about my rights not to have "marriage" watered down by gays wishing to force their twisted thinking upon society under some B.S. discrimination argument and in the process uprooting centuries of tradition as well as natural law? No thanks.

And I already mentioned earlier that I am totally okay with civil unions which provide nearly all legal rights of marriage without the "trophy" to dangle in front of society.

I guess I just don't get it...

What does "watered down" mean in this context? Is it like outlawing NASCAR because it waters down "real" race driving? :)

To Brencat:

If you want a 'sacred' marriage, have it in your bigot church that bans gay marriage.

Get your nose out of gay relationships and stop the immoral discrimination to deny them legal equality because of your bigotry.

I don't care if you don't want marriage "watered down" by gays, or blacks, or any other group who there's no reason but bigotry to discriminate against. You're wrong.

Gays don't have any 'twisted thinking', they have natural attraction to the same gender the same way you have natural attraction to the opposite gender. You're ignorant.

Centuries of tradition are wrong when the tradition is wrong - as it was with slavery, as it was with women not voting, and other things.

It's good your bigotry is less than it could be by your supporting civil unions, but not less enough. You have no right to deny gays equal rights on marriage.

It's not a "trophy" for them any more than blacks overcoming the obstacles in their way to get to vote made voting a "trophy". It's simply the end of wrongful discrimination.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: Viditor
Edit: To be clear, I'm not gay and don't wish to have a same-sex partner...that said, I loathe the idea of owning a pink car as well, but I have no objection if my neighbor has one.
And I loathe the idea of having to explain to my son and daughter why two men or two women on a park bench are sucking face or frolicking around in the park in public like a normal man+woman would do. Similarly, I loathe the idea that a gay "married" couple may eventually be able to adopt children as well as a society where a significant percentage of people might accept having two mommies or two daddies as being "normal."
I loath the idea of someone like you being able to tell others how to live their lives.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: aphex
Just out of curiosity - What if one of your kids turns out to be gay?
Heh. Surprised it took this long for one of you to ask that.

My answer is they will be loved as much as any parent can give a child. That said, they will be encouraged -- rather sternly in fact -- to lead a life of chastity. If not, they'd better keep it in the fvcking closet where I can't see it.

Nice, sounds like a future suicide. And I mean that will all honesty, seriousness and experience.

I think straight people need to get their house in order before they dare tell anyone else how to live. All these people cheating on their wives, McCain, Edwards, Ted Haggart, Clinton, Gingrich, Larry Craig.. they are the ones making a mockery of marriage.

Better yet self-righteous tightassed straights should just STFU and worry about themselves. If you want to tell people how to live, go join the Taliban and move to Pakistan. America means freedom for eveyone.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Hafen
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: aphex
Just out of curiosity - What if one of your kids turns out to be gay?
Heh. Surprised it took this long for one of you to ask that.

My answer is they will be loved as much as any parent can give a child. That said, they will be encouraged -- rather sternly in fact -- to lead a life of chastity. If not, they'd better keep it in the fvcking closet where I can't see it.

Nice, sounds like a future suicide. And I mean that will all honesty, seriousness and experience.

I think straight people need to get their house in order before they dare tell anyone else how to live. All these people cheating on their wives, McCain, Edwards, Ted Haggart, Clinton, Gingrich, Larry Craig.. they are the ones making a mockery of marriage.

Better yet self-righteous tightassed straights should just STFU and worry about themselves. If you want to tell people how to live, go join the Taliban and move to Pakistan. America means freedom for eveyone.
That's why Moral Interventionists like brencat are called the "American Taliban"

 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: Viditor
Sorry, but which "Natural Law" does that violate?
At the end of the day, ALL mariage goes against "Natural Law"...meaning that marriage is a function of culture and is not part of any inherent instinct.
It's very simple. Man+woman can procreate. Two men or two women cannot NATURALLY conceive. Same as in the animal world.

Traditional marriage serves to provide societal order as well as to continue the human race. Virtually all studies show children grow best when they have mommy and daddy around (mommy=female, daddy=male, lest there be any confusion).

Now I'm waiting for one of the loonies here to reply, "well, then should we disallow a traditional couple to marry if they don't want to have children??!" To which my answer will be, "No dipshits. But at least they are in harmony with natural law and have that capability should they choose."

If it works so well, explain the 54% divorce rate and all the single parents raising children?

Two stable gay parents > One Parent
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: brencat
Originally posted by: Viditor
Edit: To be clear, I'm not gay and don't wish to have a same-sex partner...that said, I loathe the idea of owning a pink car as well, but I have no objection if my neighbor has one.
And I loathe the idea of having to explain to my son and daughter why two men or two women on a park bench are sucking face or frolicking around in the park in public like a normal man+woman would do. Similarly, I loathe the idea that a gay "married" couple may eventually be able to adopt children as well as a society where a significant percentage of people might accept having two mommies or two daddies as being "normal."

What right do you have to tell other people how to live?

Reverse roles, what if gay marriage was the normal accepted socialtal structure because of overpopulation... and you fell in love with a woman... how would you feel if the government or society in general frowned upon it? (its far fetched, but try to imagine the scenario...)
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
I think Obama's speech was good, but not earth-shattering on the Obama scale, but still really good on a normal poltician's scale.

Nice to see the details wrapped up in a speech, but also laying out a vision of where he wants to take the country . Throw in some good McCain bashing/contrasts and it was a preety effective speech. Not really a carve in granite speech, but effective for what he needs to do.

I think McCain will have to work really really hard to not look small and outdated with that huge performance and historic moment last night. I imagine what we are going to see out of the RNC is just a lot of vile and bitterness as opposed to the uplifting and inspiring rhetoric of the DNC.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.

Maybe you should post that one more time Casiotech, I'm sure it was just a forum fluke that everyone reading the thread missed it the other times you did.


Of course that's not nearly as fun as listening to the hypocritical band wagon going on here. Yes, we really need more guys hanging around together lip locking at the park. Especially since many of the my way or the highway tunnel vission hacks engaged in this discussions would be the very first ones crying like some boogy man just ripped them away from their mothers wet nipple if some priest was standing in the opposite corner of the same park reading aloud verses from the bible.



As for the speech, just about every one on both sides discussed beforehand that to finally start and swinging more of the independents and disgruntled clinton supporters that he would finally have to start hitting specifics. Excluding Olbermann and JP whom are still undergoing their personal revelation from witnessing the ressurection of their christ, we had another standard fare of much grandstanding with an empty delivery. Won't be till later today when all the talking heads have a chance to, but I'd expect a decent majority to discuss what wasn't present in the speach.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: lupi
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.

Maybe you should post that one more time Casiotech, I'm sure it was just a forum fluke that everyone reading the thread missed it the other times you did.


Of course that's not nearly as fun as listening to the hypocritical band wagon going on here. Yes, we really need more guys hanging around together lip locking at the park. Especially since many of the my way or the highway tunnel vission hacks engaged in this discussions would be the very first ones crying like some boogy man just ripped them away from their mothers wet nipple if some priest was standing in the opposite corner of the same park reading aloud verses from the bible.



As for the speech, just about every one on both sides discussed beforehand that to finally start and swinging more of the independents and disgruntled clinton supporters that he would finally have to start hitting specifics. Excluding Olbermann and JP whom are still undergoing their personal revelation from witnessing the ressurection of their christ, we had another standard fare of much grandstanding with an empty delivery. Won't be till later today when all the talking heads have a chance to, but I'd expect a decent majority to discuss what wasn't present in the speach.

Bitter much?
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I am pretty sure McCain will make a similar lofty speech, long on promises and dreams, but the reality is both candidates will have champagne plans and not even a beer pocketbook. The USA is going to have to have an austerity budget for the next decade or so and we are going to have to stop hemorrhaging money on boondoggle foreign quagmires. If the US can't control inflation, interest payment on servicing the debt will gut discretionary spending.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.

McCain stole the "C" from the OP; he needed it to call his wife a wise and beautiful woman.
 

winnar111

Banned
Mar 10, 2008
2,847
0
0
Obama receives no poll bounce

Text

Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama successfully used his convention speech to lay out the stakes for the November election and draw a contrast with Republican John McCain, though he may receive little or no bounce in the polls, the Democratic nominee's chief strategist said.


 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Farang
Maybe I should be more specific--his name is spelled "Barack" not "Barak" and I'd hope someone who was following the election would know that.

McCain stole the "C" from the OP; he needed it to call his wife a wise and beautiful woman.

Lol
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: winnar111
Obama receives no poll bounce

Text

Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama successfully used his convention speech to lay out the stakes for the November election and draw a contrast with Republican John McCain, though he may receive little or no bounce in the polls, the Democratic nominee's chief strategist said.

*whisper* that's called downplaying expectations.

"Obama sees convention bounce"
 

QED

Diamond Member
Dec 16, 2005
3,428
3
0
Originally posted by: jonks
Originally posted by: winnar111
Obama receives no poll bounce

Text

Aug. 29 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama successfully used his convention speech to lay out the stakes for the November election and draw a contrast with Republican John McCain, though he may receive little or no bounce in the polls, the Democratic nominee's chief strategist said.

*whisper* that's called downplaying expectations.

"Obama sees convention bounce"

Yeah, I hate to agree with jonks but it's pretty standard after a convention for everyone in the party to say there will be little or no bounce in the polls even though they know there will be one. When the bounce comes, then they can turn around and say "our message obviously resonated with the American people".

It'll be curious to see what kind of bounce Obama does get from his speech-- I'd venture to say probably not as much as he got from Bill Clinton's speech on Wednesday.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
I think with that one speech Obama has shifted the balance of the campaign issues-forcing the GOP to defend their policies and record, and not making the election a a referendum about Obama. While showing again his humanity, he showed some real backbone-which is what people are looking for when they approve negative advertising. But his was honest criticism, not phony "celebrity" and inexperience jabs.

I thought the speech was just about perfect as a political move. From here on out, McCain is definately fighting uphill.

 

Taejin

Moderator<br>Love & Relationships
Aug 29, 2004
3,270
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What are going to be the "specifics" in McCain's speech next week?

"I'm a PEE-OHH-DUBYA..."

"My five years in a VEE-ATE-NAM-EASE prison camp..."

"My friends, it's time for some STRATE talk..."

"There will be MOHR wars..."

If some of you are praying your lord-and-savior John McBush will bring specifics next week, don't hold your breath.

You know I agree with you on pretty much all the important issues, but McCain doesn't have a southern accent. You seem to be mocking Bush more than McCain. Be fair.

Be fair? Oh really? I think a more objective third party could say something like that, but you?

Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: ZOOYUKA
What was the deal about gays and lesbians not being able to visit there partners in the hospital?

it's true, they can't if they're not married... but obama doesn't support gay marriage.

Heck no, the Koran takes a poor view of that kind of stuff.

Kindly shut up.


EDIT: What's really ironic is that Nebor makes his little gem of a comment a page before he starts preaching to jpeyton about 'fairness'.. what a turd.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Taejin
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What are going to be the "specifics" in McCain's speech next week?

"I'm a PEE-OHH-DUBYA..."

"My five years in a VEE-ATE-NAM-EASE prison camp..."

"My friends, it's time for some STRATE talk..."

"There will be MOHR wars..."

If some of you are praying your lord-and-savior John McBush will bring specifics next week, don't hold your breath.

You know I agree with you on pretty much all the important issues, but McCain doesn't have a southern accent. You seem to be mocking Bush more than McCain. Be fair.

Be fair? Oh really? I think a more objective third party could say something like that, but you?

Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: ZOOYUKA
What was the deal about gays and lesbians not being able to visit there partners in the hospital?

it's true, they can't if they're not married... but obama doesn't support gay marriage.

Heck no, the Koran takes a poor view of that kind of stuff.

Kindly shut up.
Come on that's was funny .;)