- May 30, 2000
- 2,563
- 47
- 91
Banned from Nvidia Forums, and here is why?.
I posted this morning on Nvidia forums about the state of the 8800 series and the lack of Drivers for Vista.
I, as many others, have legitimate copies of Vista through MSDN as well as being beta testers for Microsoft. This is not my first Beta Test, nor will it be my last.
I stated that in my opinion, the fact of having no driver for the 8800 series and Vista leads me to believe that there is a SERIOUS problem going on in writing the driver. It has been RTM for about 2 months now, and not even a Beta driver. I stated that we may find out that you will need to purchase the revision hardware, as the launch hardware is not fully DX10 compatible or may need to change for the driver and Vista to work correctly.
I also stated that I did not purchase the 8800 so that I can have a few more FPS in XP.
I bought this card for the same reason I feel everyone else has, to get full use and speed
In Vista. If all I wanted was XP performance, an ATI X1950 or 7900 Series GPU would have been just fine.
For the above, Chris Ray BANNED me?.
No, let me speak my mind?
There are Drivers for every ATI card as well as all PREVIOUS NVidia GPU?s for Vista,
Why not for the card that was SUPPOSEDLY built for Vista? What is the big secret that
Is being hidden from the public, as well as the review sites? I already know the card is purchased is 10% cheaper, and may turn out to be the Next Voodoo5 series.
Let me chronicle the NVidia purchases I have made in the past (note: these are for only MYsystems, does not include the cards purchased for family)
TNT
TNT2
GeForce256
GeForce2
GeForce3
GeForce 4400
GeForce 6800GT
GeForce 7800GTX
GeFroce 7800GT (SLI)
GeFroce 7900GTX (SLI)
GeForce 7900GT (SLI)
GeForce 7950GX2
In the past, NVidia was known for being just a tad worse than ATI in desktop graphics, but the driver support could not be beat. Over the past couple of years, this has changed. And in my opinion, ATI is far more concerned about their drivers, and are constantly working to improve them. That was the main reason I had stuck with Nvidia through the years. But after this latest situation, I am appalled at the actions and non-communication from NVidia on their flagship card.
What is the big surprise on Jan 30th, that we have all invested in a card that runs Aero, but ends there? The performance is beaten by the ATI X1900 series and 7900 GPU?s in Vista? When someone has nothing to hide, they communicate and have Beta drivers available. Why the BIG curtain on the 8800 series and Vista? I must have the most expensive VGA display for Vista (of course, only beaten by those with 8800GTX SLI setups).
This was Chris Ray?s Private Message on the Nvidia Forums to me?
You have a new personal message from ChrisRay
Stop returning to the forums.
Stop coming back to these forums. You are not welcome on them.
ChrisRay is a member of the Moderators group and has 910 posts.
Thanks Chris, I see where Nvidia is heading currently, and look forward to
The AMD-ATI offering for my future endeavors?
I posted this morning on Nvidia forums about the state of the 8800 series and the lack of Drivers for Vista.
I, as many others, have legitimate copies of Vista through MSDN as well as being beta testers for Microsoft. This is not my first Beta Test, nor will it be my last.
I stated that in my opinion, the fact of having no driver for the 8800 series and Vista leads me to believe that there is a SERIOUS problem going on in writing the driver. It has been RTM for about 2 months now, and not even a Beta driver. I stated that we may find out that you will need to purchase the revision hardware, as the launch hardware is not fully DX10 compatible or may need to change for the driver and Vista to work correctly.
I also stated that I did not purchase the 8800 so that I can have a few more FPS in XP.
I bought this card for the same reason I feel everyone else has, to get full use and speed
In Vista. If all I wanted was XP performance, an ATI X1950 or 7900 Series GPU would have been just fine.
For the above, Chris Ray BANNED me?.
No, let me speak my mind?
There are Drivers for every ATI card as well as all PREVIOUS NVidia GPU?s for Vista,
Why not for the card that was SUPPOSEDLY built for Vista? What is the big secret that
Is being hidden from the public, as well as the review sites? I already know the card is purchased is 10% cheaper, and may turn out to be the Next Voodoo5 series.
Let me chronicle the NVidia purchases I have made in the past (note: these are for only MYsystems, does not include the cards purchased for family)
TNT
TNT2
GeForce256
GeForce2
GeForce3
GeForce 4400
GeForce 6800GT
GeForce 7800GTX
GeFroce 7800GT (SLI)
GeFroce 7900GTX (SLI)
GeForce 7900GT (SLI)
GeForce 7950GX2
In the past, NVidia was known for being just a tad worse than ATI in desktop graphics, but the driver support could not be beat. Over the past couple of years, this has changed. And in my opinion, ATI is far more concerned about their drivers, and are constantly working to improve them. That was the main reason I had stuck with Nvidia through the years. But after this latest situation, I am appalled at the actions and non-communication from NVidia on their flagship card.
What is the big surprise on Jan 30th, that we have all invested in a card that runs Aero, but ends there? The performance is beaten by the ATI X1900 series and 7900 GPU?s in Vista? When someone has nothing to hide, they communicate and have Beta drivers available. Why the BIG curtain on the 8800 series and Vista? I must have the most expensive VGA display for Vista (of course, only beaten by those with 8800GTX SLI setups).
This was Chris Ray?s Private Message on the Nvidia Forums to me?
You have a new personal message from ChrisRay
Stop returning to the forums.
Stop coming back to these forums. You are not welcome on them.
ChrisRay is a member of the Moderators group and has 910 posts.
Thanks Chris, I see where Nvidia is heading currently, and look forward to
The AMD-ATI offering for my future endeavors?