Backlash against Mexicans

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Pernsworth

Banned
Apr 18, 2009
11
0
0
Mexico is not a race, it is a country. Mexicans are not a race, they are a mix of 3 races; Spanish, indigeous people (aka "indians") and blacks. There was some author in the 1940's that tried to assert that the mix of these 3 races created a new, hybrid race called "meztisos", but this is considered pure BS by most honest people. It's in the same class as "Qwanza".

There is in fact something VERY peculiar about our good Neighbors to the south. In any other geopolitical/cultural context, the massive outflow of "immigrants" from one country to another in similar circumstances would not be described as anything other than "economic refugees"; the natural result that occurs when one countries' economy fails to the point where a signficant number of it's citizens flee to improved economic opportunities. And in any other similar circumstance, it would be obvious that Mexico is a failed state. It has failed to fulfill it's basic responsiblities to it's people, as is proven by the massive outflow of it's citizens.

Only, there is no calling a spade a spade here. One does not criticize or accurately describe anything about Mexico. To do so insults Mexico, which therefore insults Mexicans, who believe they are a race.

Therefore, any criticism of Mexico is racist.

This dynamic allows Los Mexicanos atocar (to feel) "la prida" (or "el orgullo", or pride) of being Mexicans, without the encumbrance of actually understanding what that means, their defences are so well-entrenched, and supported by liberal non-mexicans enmired in notions of "cultural diversity" and other college indoctrinated pap. Ignorance is merely bliss, but removing the possiblity of ever being anything OTHER than ignorant is pure and eternal ectasy.

None of which is relevant, until the deficiencies of the Mexican Health Care system threaten to infect the rest of the world. Or whatever unique qualities Mexico has that allows dozens of their citizens to be killed by a virus that (at my last understanding) has only killed one American.

Addressing the problem of Mexico's inferior status is now important, perhaps to the survival of us all. However, we must speak and act as if the glaringly obvious were not true at all. Mexico IS inferior, in numerous clearly definable ways. Denying this fundamental and simple truth is the first step towards achieving some constructive solutions.
 

Red Irish

Guest
Mar 6, 2009
1,605
0
0
Originally posted by: Pernsworth

There is in fact something VERY peculiar about our good Neighbors to the south. In any other geopolitical/cultural context, the massive outflow of "immigrants" from one country to another in similar circumstances would not be described as anything other than "economic refugees"; the natural result that occurs when one countries' economy fails to the point where a signficant number of it's citizens flee to improved economic opportunities. And in any other similar circumstance, it would be obvious that Mexico is a failed state. It has failed to fulfill it's basic responsiblities to it's people, as is proven by the massive outflow of it's citizens.

Mexico may have failed; however, exclusively blaming poorer countries for their economic situation ignores the fact that richer countries have acquired and maintained their position by ensuring that poorer countries remain poorer over the course of time.

Incidentally, I think you'll find that the correct verb is "sentir", i.e. sentirse orgulloso (feel proud):

Originally posted by: Pernsworth
This dynamic allows Los Mexicanos atocar (to feel) "la prida" (or "el orgullo", or pride) of being Mexicans ...

 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: Phokus
You can read more about the backlash against Mexicans here:

http://www.gop.com/

Really? Right from your link:
Immigration, National Security, and the Rule of Law

Immigration policy is a national security issue, for which we have one test: Does it serve the national interest? By that standard, Republicans know America can have a strong immigration system without sacrificing the rule of law.

Enforcing the Rule of Law at the Border and Throughout the Nation

Border security is essential to national security. In an age of terrorism, drug cartels, and criminal gangs, allowing millions of unidentified persons to enter and remain in this country poses grave risks to the sovereignty of the United States and the security of its people. We simply must be able to track who is entering and leaving our country.

Our determination to uphold the rule of law begins with more effective enforcement, giving our agents the tools and resources they need to protect our sovereignty, completing the border fence quickly and securing the borders, and employing complementary strategies to secure our ports of entry. Experience shows that enforcement of existing laws is effective in reducing and reversing illegal immigration.

Our commitment to the rule of law means smarter enforcement at the workplace, against illegal workers and lawbreaking employers alike, along with those who practice identity theft and traffic in fraudulent documents. As long as jobs are available in the United States, economic incentives to enter illegally will persist. But we must empower employers so they can know with confidence that those they hire are permitted to work. That means that the E-Verify system?which is an internet-based system that verifies the employment authorization and identity of employees?must be reauthorized. A phased-in requirement that employers use the E-Verify system must be enacted.

The rule of law means guaranteeing to law enforcement the tools and coordination to deport criminal aliens without delay ? and correcting court decisions that have made deportation so difficult. It means enforcing the law against those who overstay their visas, rather than letting millions flout the generosity that gave them temporary entry. It means imposing maximum penalties on those who smuggle illegal aliens into the U.S., both for their lawbreaking and for their cruel exploitation. It means requiring cooperation among federal, state and local law enforcement and real consequences, including the denial of federal funds, for self-described sanctuary cities, which stand in open defiance of the federal and state statutes that expressly prohibit such sanctuary policies, and which endanger the lives of U.S. citizens. It does not mean driver's licenses for illegal aliens, nor does it mean that states should be allowed to flout the federal law barring them from giving in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens, nor does it mean that illegal aliens should receive social security benefits, or other public benefits, except as provided by federal law.

We oppose amnesty. The rule of law suffers if government policies encourage or reward illegal activity. The American people's rejection of en masse legalizations is especially appropriate given the federal government's past failures to enforce the law.

Embracing Immigrant Communities

Today's immigrants are walking in the steps of most other Americans' ancestors, seeking the American dream and contributing culturally and economically to our nation. We celebrate the industry and love of liberty of these fellow Americans.
Both government and the private sector must do more to foster legally present immigrants' integration into American life to advance respect for the rule of law and a common American identity. It is a national disgrace that the first experience most new Americans have is with a dysfunctional immigration bureaucracy defined by delay and confusion; we will no longer tolerate those failures.

In our multiethnic nation, everyone ? immigrants and native-born alike ? must embrace our core values of liberty, equality, meritocracy, and respect for human dignity and the rights of women.

One sign of our unity is our English language. For newcomers, it has always been the fastest route to prosperity in America. English empowers. We support English as the official language in our nation, while welcoming the ethnic diversity in the United States and the territories, including language. Immigrants should be encouraged to learn English. English is the accepted language of business, commerce, and legal proceedings, and it is essential as a unifying cultural force. It is also important, as part of cultural integration, that our schools provide better education in U.S. history and civics for all children, thereby fostering a commitment to our national motto, E Pluribus Unum.

We are grateful to the thousands of new immigrants, many of them not yet citizens, who are serving in the Armed Forces. Their patriotism is inspiring; it should remind the institutions of civil society of the need to embrace newcomers, assist their journey to full citizenship, and help their communities avoid patterns of isolation.

Welcoming Refugees

Our country continues to accept refugees from troubled lands all over the world. In some cases, these are people who stood with America in dangerous times, and they have first call on our hospitality. We oppose, however, the granting of refugee status on the basis of lifestyle or other non-political factors

Hostility to Mexicans not found.
 

Scarpozzi

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
26,391
1,780
126
Originally posted by: Arcadio
Only racists would blame the Mexicans...obviously. Educated, intelligent individuals of course know that there is no reason to blame a country's people for a virus spreading throughout the world, unless they're Mexican.

Fixed. ;)

 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: Phokus
You can read more about the backlash against Mexicans here:

http://www.gop.com/

Really? Right from your link:


Hostility to Mexicans not found.

i was being facetious with the link. the official gop website obviously isn't going to say 'we hate mexicans!', but you'd be naive to think that many conservatives don't hate mexicans.
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: Phokus
You can read more about the backlash against Mexicans here:

http://www.gop.com/

Really? Right from your link:


Hostility to Mexicans not found.

i was being facetious with the link. the official DNC website obviously isn't going to say 'we hate America!', but you'd be naive to think that many liberals don't hate America.

Thanks. Now I see how that works. I can just spew slander with no evidence and it magically becomes fact.
 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
16,843
2
0
Like SARS and orientals?!

Only ignorant people blame a whole nationality for something like this...

Koing
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
perhaps OP wants to have a repeat of the spanish inquisition...

instead of blaming the prostitues for the black plague... this time he wants us to blame the mexicans???


I say...its the pigs faults... DOWN WITH BACON... BURN HAM AT THE STAKE... PORK CHOP IS A WITCH!!!