Yes it has a crossover. The 4" driver wouldn't be a problem if you lower the 30hz frequency via equalizer. There is also a thing called "Gain" control knob on the back of the sub. You must be new.Depending on your main/sub crossover frequency (I hope you have a crossover), you're either a) running your sub up too high, hurting your imaging in the midbass due to localization, or b) lacking in clean dynamics in the midbass by running the 4" driver too low. There's no way you can appropriately match a 4" mid to a 12" sub unless the mid is ultra-long-excursion. Even inside of a floorstander it's difficult to do.
Yes it has a crossover. The 4" driver wouldn't be a problem if you lower the 30hz frequency via equalizer. There is also a thing called "Gain" control knob on the back of the sub. You must be new.
The problem with large front channel speakers is that they lack high's and mid's. Also often sound muddy. This is usually found in WALMART or TARGET grade speakers that you buy.![]()
Yes, the A2 speakers with $1200 Angel cable won. The Focal CMS40 with Benchmark DAC-1 and sub was actually a downgrade. Without the Benchmark DAC, the Focal speakers and sub sounds better. The money spent on the benchmark DAC wasn't worth it at all...Quote from another thread:
"As a matter of fact I just returned both my Focal CMS40 speakers and Benchmark DAC-1 for a refund because they are not any better than my A2 setup."
I guess this settles his "COMPETITION"
You just now figured that out? Man you are slow....Wow. He can't use his expensive cable with the new speakers.
The BOSE setup I had previously was before I became a "true" "audiophile"... And I had no intention spending money on audio back then.And quess what I found at the AVS forrum!!!!!!!!
Audioengine A2 speakers + SVS SB12-NSD Sub + $200 copper & $1200 silver cable - PICS
In the thread it turns out this hole thing was an update to replace his Bose system. There are even pictures of his Bose set up. Apparently, he liked to wax his Panasonic TVs.
It's just that I am famous at avsforum (and a legendary forum member at Anandtech). My PM box exploded because it had full of messages complimenting my setup and my passion for video (and audio nowThe first response in that thread: A picture of a troll.
So you never had experience with the A2 speakers. No wonder...I just looked up the specs on his A2s. They are ridiculously small computer speakers. Reading his superlative comments, you'd think they would be some of the highest quality speaker ever produced.
They will also replace Audioengine A5 speakers and many many other speakers in the similar class. This can be done with a $5 audio cable + A2.Well they replaced his Bose so yes, there would have been a significant improvement in sound.
I know... I love my new sig. I admire Patrick. He is the man, the best of the best. I am second.Has anybody noticed his new sig......
I am not making any of this up.
You don't have any good contribution to make for audio so don't even bother posting... You make very short comments that are meaningless and worthless. I noticed this when I first saw you posting in audio forum section. Are you young?Get a life. There is no defeating physics.
You don't have any good contribution to make for audio so don't even bother posting... You make very short comments that are meaningless and worthless. I noticed this when I first saw you posting in audio forum section. Are you young?
![]()
Explain how a 4" driver is supposed to cover 3k Hz to 20Hz?
I truly believe you are mentally ill. I'm not trying to be insulting.Yes it has a crossover. The 4" driver wouldn't be a problem if you lower the 30hz frequency via equalizer. There is also a thing called "Gain" control knob on the back of the sub. You must be new.
The problem with large front channel speakers is that they lack high's and mid's. Also often sound muddy. This is usually found in WALMART or TARGET grade speakers that you buy.![]()
i was wholly unimpressed with the audioengines. my topping tp21 amp + dayton bookshelves blows them out of the water.
Yes, the A2 speakers with $1200 Angel cable won. The Focal CMS40 with Benchmark DAC-1 and sub was actually a downgrade. Without the Benchmark DAC, the Focal speakers and sub sounds better. The money spent on the benchmark DAC wasn't worth it at all...
Ha ha
I don't think he's in it for the audio. He's in it for the shiny.The fact that the Focal CMS40 with Benchmark DAC-1 don't sound any better then you Audioengine A2s says a lot about the value of amplified desktop speakers. No matter how much you spend on them, they will remain low end audio solution.
I spent less money then you on my audio gears, yet there is no "COMPETITION". Check my sig for pics. You would be amazed at how good my system sound.
Cheez, if you like audio, listen to what people have to say in here. We are technical people, we love technology, we would not bulsh1t you.
I don't think he's in it for the audio. He's in it for the shiny.
Not so sure he's even in it for the shiny. I believe he suffers from a complex of some sort.Ya I think you're right. I read his comment in the Good HT 5.1 system for $600?
I am just disgusted and I reported his post. I just don't think people should be allowed to post this kind of nonsense in a technical forum like Anandtech.
He needs to be perma-banned.
ROTFLMAO
So this guy REALLY spent that much money on these wires? WOW
More power to whoever sold it to him I guess.
I love how spent $1200 on a f'in wire but he can't even run the wires to his TV thru the wall. Quality work I tell ya.
It's almost unreal that such stupidity exists in this world.
its because you don't have them hooked up with a $1200 cable, :biggrin:
Not so sure he's even in it for the shiny.
Anubis = sibuna .... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOL
You're welcome, but you own a set of Polks speakers? I was right..... most folks here on anandtech use cheap grade speakers from WALMART.I just got these $1200 cables to go with $999 HDMI cable from Best buy.
WOW. My POS polks now sounds like $10000 speakers.
Cheez, thanks SO much for your advice!!!
:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
The following items have been reviewed and the final winner is.........
![]()
Final Score
![]()
The CMS40 takes the trophy home...
The CMS50's are going back. Will be getting the pair of CMS40 as it has clearly superior mid-range openness and more air in the treble region. It just sounded wider.
![]()
Hang on here, how did you make all those measurements?
What scale did you use?
What test equipment did you use?
Let me hazard a guess as to your methodology: you pulled those numbers out of your pooper? I mean, how else would somebody "measure" accuracy or midrange openess or focus/musicality?
And to top it off:
You returned your cms40, ordered cms50 and now you're going to return the cms50 and reorder the cms40?
Cheez: the gift that keeps on giving!!!!!!!!
Thank you for the entertainment.
![]()
