Attempt to beat train in Mich. ends 5 young lives

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

tyler811

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2002
5,385
0
71
Ity is simply amazing at how many people jump on the "Darwin" bandwagon when they do not even know what it means and the rest are using it out of context.


The facts are some driver made a fatal mistake that cost the lives of four other people. Shattering we do not how many more lives in friends and family. Would the girl be a welfare case or have some sort impact that would have contributed to society? What about all the males? Murders, junkies child molesters or doctors, children advocates, business men. Not one person here knows and anyone who says they do is just showing what heartless, closed minded selfish morally bankrupt socially inept people they are.

I know many people who made very bad decisions growing up. Some are now family men with a house and job from auto mechanics to corporate VP's.

I know people who never recovered from their bad decisions tearing apart families and some in cases leading to more death by parents anguished over the loss of a child then take their own life. If you have never suffered the loss of a loved then please do not tell me they are weak for their actions.

Many people here talk a big game but if life were to hit back hard I wonder how many of you would have the courage and fortitude to carry on say as like Funboy.


I am going to leave this thread to other peoples thoughts so quote me out loud and often as I am sure you will and flame away. Your responses will show your true charactor.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Originally posted by: IGBT
ya. lets try to out run the train. car full of dopers I'll bet.

OMFG! teens smoking weed! what did you do as a teen, fap off to mom's "Woman's day" mags and attend young republicans club meetings??.
 

AbAbber2k

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2005
6,474
1
0
""Not a reckless driver," Bulmer said. "He just didn't think all the time.""

Not reckless, just a fucking ritard. And as a result, he got 4 innocent people killed. Its a shame he's dead. He deserves to live a long full life in an iron lung constantly reliving the moment of his epic idiocy.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Who wants to bet that parents on ATOT who mentioned "Darwin" have kids who are doing some incredibly stupid shit without their knowledge?

Your teenage daughters are smoking drugs and smoking poles.
 

EGGO

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2004
5,504
1
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: EGGO
Originally posted by: Jeff7
"Not a reckless driver," Bulmer said. "He just didn't think all the time."
Well that's not exactly good either.

"The young man behind the wheel, Dan Broughton, had a number of traffic violations on his record, including speeding and running a stop sign. His license had been suspended a day before the wreck for driving without carrying a license back in April."

Sounds like a reckless one to me.

I got a speeding ticket back in November...I guess I'm reckless too.

A speeding ticket? No. "A number of violations including speeding tickets and running a stop sign" and driving with a suspended license? Yes.

I'm not going to say anything about the passengers. I know nothing about what happened in that car, whether they didn't know, knew and wanted him to try, or knew and wanted him to stop. All I know is what happened to the car, who controlled the car and what his history is like. Correlation may not equal causation, but seeing that he ran stop signs, I can see why he'd try to run this and lost.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,975
1,175
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: QueBert
I bet most of his tickets are from speeding, if cops ticketed everyone who sped, 90% of ATOT would be without a license. He obviously wasn't a good driver, but to say he was any worse than the next is speculation. All we know is he was unlucky and got caught more. And it's retarded for anyone to claim his friends had to know, I'm sure his "bad driving" wasn't even that noticeably bad.

Your statement I bolded is nothing but speculation. Why is that you demean others for speculation, but it's OK for you to do it? Get off your high horse.

Because QueBert is a known idiot around these parts? But that's just speculation on my part.

Maybe because when I'm out driving most people drive like it's their first time behind the wheel. I'd bet any amount of money his driving was on par with MOST people. Which mean it was fucking horrible, but it's doubtful it was more noticable than the next persons shitty driving. Speeding and running stop signs are common place, if you're not a defense driver you're screwed. MOST drivers I see on the road should definitely have their license suspended and not be driving at all. This guy was obviously one of them, just one of them who got caught driving poorly more than once. It doesn't take many tickets to get your license taken away. It's not like he had 50 tickets. I know people who lost theirs after 3 tickets over a couple years.

And about my speculation vs theirs. They're speculating the others in the car were egging him on, and they somehow deserved to die. That's kind of different than what I'm doing.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Eli
Some of you people make me fucking sick. This is NOT Darwinism by any stretch of the imagination. If it would have been one driver, that's fine. The passengers did not deserve to die.

:| Fucking Christ.

you're assuming that they were totally innocent...how do you know they were not egging the driver on?

do you REALLY think this was the drivers first attempt at doing something stupid?

How may stop lights or stop signs do you think they ran?

this kind of irresponsible driving does not just happen over night....I would be willing to bet the driver had a rep for this kind of shit.

sorry.....life's a bitch.....I would rather see these five idiots go up in flames than some mother and her 6 month old hit head on by this fuckwad....sorry but Darwin got it right.

:thumbsup:

The real tragedy is that you have to bring your life's treadmarked baggage into a forum like this. Life must have been a bitch.

Bitter antisocial attention whores really deserve their own board, so if anyone has the audacity to post about anything on it, they can all trash the post, discredit the poster, and insult the responses, and in the process cowardly convincing themselves they're acquiring lots of 'manpoints'. :D

You have issues. Stop projecting.
 

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's not tragic, it's natural selection.

Silly to say, when only one person made the bad decision.

Wrong.

And you know this how?, tell us, were you in the car to hear all the youths scream "GO FOR IT"?? Guess not, so that just makes you another ATOT blowhard, everyone knows this...
 

RaistlinZ

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
7,470
9
91
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.

At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:
 

PieIsAwesome

Diamond Member
Feb 11, 2007
4,054
1
0
The girl was probably a whore, the male passengers probably gangsters, rapists, child abusers, puppy-kickers and druggies, and all the passengers probably encouraged the driver to try and beat the train and they all probably knew the driver had a history of traffic violations and a suspended license, and they were all probably capable of commandeering the car right before being hit by the train or at least distracting the driver enough to speed into something less deadly like a tree, so they all deserved to die.
 

EMPshockwave82

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2003
3,012
2
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: newnameman
Video here.
They most likely never saw the train and died without even knowing it was about to happen.

Going around a stopped car and around a gate with flashing lights, they knew............

Originally posted by: tcsenter
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: newnameman
Video here.
They most likely never saw the train and died without even knowing it was about to happen.
Exactly. It is plainly visible in the video that the train would have been almost entirely obstructed by trees unless you were very close to the tracks. The car barely slowed down. The four passengers would have had almost no opportunity to react or somehow use their Mighty Power Ranger like reflexes to stop the driver, as some fantasize would be their reaction. Its not the passenger's responsibility to be watching out for road hazards and monitoring the driver, anyway. I would question what the hell a 14 year-old girl was doing in a car with four men ranging from age 17 to 21 (she was dating one of them).

It's plainly visible in the video that the camera is at an angle to the crossing and that you cannot make the claim that the crossing was obstructed by the tree from what you see.

Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: I Saw OJ
I dont understand how this happens. How can you not judge the distance between yourself and the train to determine if there is enough time to cross the tracks?
Because they couldn't see the train.

The driver might have been trying to show off or something stupid. As one story I read said "accidents among teen drivers increase based on the number of people in the car"

Do you live in this area? Maybe we can get someone from this location to let us know how poor the visibility is at this crossing from this direction.



I feel sorry for the parents of all 5 children that died. I feel sorry for any of the people in the car that attempted to get the driver to stop. I feel even more sorry for the crew of the train that could be suffering because of an idiots choice.
 

EMPshockwave82

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2003
3,012
2
0
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.

At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:

They will pull the tapes from the engine (nearly all engines that operate on main line track have image recorders and black box recorders).

They overlay the video with the history of all controls being manipulated in the cab of the engine. The investigators will be able to tell what speed the engine was going to within 0.1MPH, when the engineer began to blow the horn, how long the engineer blew the horn, when the bell began to ring, how far from the crossing the gates activated, how long they were down before the crossing was occupied by the engine, etc......


Doubtful they will get very far even if they attempt.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.

At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:

They will pull the tapes from the engine (nearly all engines that operate on main line track have image recorders and black box recorders).

They overlay the video with the history of all controls being manipulated in the cab of the engine. The investigators will be able to tell what speed the engine was going to within 0.1MPH, when the engineer began to blow the horn, how long the engineer blew the horn, when the bell began to ring, how far from the crossing the gates activated, how long they were down before the crossing was occupied by the engine, etc......


Doubtful they will get very far even if they attempt.

I've been wondering for a while about this - what are the fail safe/redundancy system on the gates and crossing lights? Defective crossing gate has a huge chance of turning into a fatality.

Does the engineer know when he's approaching a crossing with a defective gate?
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: CRXican
bad company

she was probably a whore

---------

What the hell is wrong with you? Knock it off.

Moderator Eli
Should have 'killed' his account and then we could have all had a big laugh about it.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Eli
Some of you people make me fucking sick. This is NOT Darwinism by any stretch of the imagination. If it would have been one driver, that's fine. The passengers did not deserve to die.

:| Fucking Christ.

you're assuming that they were totally innocent...how do you know they were not egging the driver on?

do you REALLY think this was the drivers first attempt at doing something stupid?

How may stop lights or stop signs do you think they ran?

this kind of irresponsible driving does not just happen over night....I would be willing to bet the driver had a rep for this kind of shit.

sorry.....life's a bitch.....I would rather see these five idiots go up in flames than some mother and her 6 month old hit head on by this fuckwad....sorry but Darwin got it right.

:thumbsup:

The real tragedy is that you have to bring your life's treadmarked baggage into a forum like this. Life must have been a bitch.

Bitter antisocial attention whores really deserve their own board, so if anyone has the audacity to post about anything on it, they can all trash the post, discredit the poster, and insult the responses, and in the process cowardly convincing themselves they're acquiring lots of 'manpoints'. :D

You have issues. Stop projecting.

Sorry, meant to say the human race is stronger that these kids died and you've survived to this point. "Natural selection" at its finest!
 

EMPshockwave82

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2003
3,012
2
0
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.

At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:

They will pull the tapes from the engine (nearly all engines that operate on main line track have image recorders and black box recorders).

They overlay the video with the history of all controls being manipulated in the cab of the engine. The investigators will be able to tell what speed the engine was going to within 0.1MPH, when the engineer began to blow the horn, how long the engineer blew the horn, when the bell began to ring, how far from the crossing the gates activated, how long they were down before the crossing was occupied by the engine, etc......


Doubtful they will get very far even if they attempt.

I've been wondering for a while about this - what are the fail safe/redundancy system on the gates and crossing lights? Defective crossing gate has a huge chance of turning into a fatality.

Does the engineer know when he's approaching a crossing with a defective gate?

Fail safe on gate systems are setup to drop the gates on a power loss automatically. They have battery backup systems that should last for 36 hours after a power loss (some of them even have solar panel chargers).

Also, the train dispatcher for the area should be alerted by a railroad employee in charge of the signaling system that there was a power outage and to issue a "stop and protect" order on those crossings in the area. That means that the train has to stop before entering the crossing, the conductor has to get off the engine and walk across ahead of the movement, make sure nothing is coming and command movement through the crossing, then get back on the locomotive.
 

jme5343

Platinum Member
Nov 21, 2003
2,333
0
71
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82

Fail safe on gate systems are setup to drop the gates on a power loss automatically. They have battery backup systems that should last for 36 hours after a power loss (some of them even have solar panel chargers).

Also, the train dispatcher for the area should be alerted by a railroad employee in charge of the signaling system that there was a power outage and to issue a "stop and protect" order on those crossings in the area. That means that the train has to stop before entering the crossing, the conductor has to get off the engine and walk across ahead of the movement, make sure nothing is coming and command movement through the crossing, then get back on the locomotive.

Spot on answer here ^.

As a railroader, it's disgusting how many people take the chance on going through gates or not stopping at crossings that have stop signs.

Even more disgusting is the fact that many of them file suit and frequently make bank off of a settlement since the litigation process is so expensive.

Stop. Look. Listen. LIVE. It's cheesy, but my kids know that, any person of driving age should know it as well.
 

manowar821

Diamond Member
Mar 1, 2007
6,063
0
0
When approaching a blind intersection, why do people not slow the fuck down to see what's possibly coming their way? ESPECIALLY BLIND TRAIN CROSSINGS. Honestly, though, I feel bad for the 5 of them. Somebody didn't teach that kid how to properly drive and be alert.
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
I have seem some crazy people do things like this where I live. About 2000ft from my front door is a major train crossing. It has two trains a day, 6:20 AM and 10:30PM . They always sound the horn, really annoying when you first move here till you get used to it. I have seen people go around the barrier before but luckily nobody has gotten hit. If they did it would be a disaster. The train is always loaded down with about 20-30 cars of corn and tankers of corn syrup. I don't think people realize how much force is behind a train fully loaded traveling at even low speeds. They can't stop when someone tries to beat the train there is just not enough track.


 

TraumaRN

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2005
6,893
63
91
I doubt any lawsuit would stick anyways, if you watch the video, he passes the white car and from that camera angle doesn't even appear to slow down. At least I hope they didn't see it coming and at least death was most likely instantaneous. From what I'm hearing from a relative who knows some of the local PD and such, the train was going approximately ~64mph at time of impact and they bodies were apparently so mangled they were identifying the bodies from jewelry and clothes they had on.