Originally posted by: IGBT
ya. lets try to out run the train. car full of dopers I'll bet.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: EGGO
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Well that's not exactly good either."Not a reckless driver," Bulmer said. "He just didn't think all the time."
"The young man behind the wheel, Dan Broughton, had a number of traffic violations on his record, including speeding and running a stop sign. His license had been suspended a day before the wreck for driving without carrying a license back in April."
Sounds like a reckless one to me.
I got a speeding ticket back in November...I guess I'm reckless too.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: boomerang
Originally posted by: QueBert
I bet most of his tickets are from speeding, if cops ticketed everyone who sped, 90% of ATOT would be without a license. He obviously wasn't a good driver, but to say he was any worse than the next is speculation. All we know is he was unlucky and got caught more. And it's retarded for anyone to claim his friends had to know, I'm sure his "bad driving" wasn't even that noticeably bad.
Your statement I bolded is nothing but speculation. Why is that you demean others for speculation, but it's OK for you to do it? Get off your high horse.
Because QueBert is a known idiot around these parts? But that's just speculation on my part.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's not tragic, it's natural selection.
Originally posted by: Ns1
I feel bad for the passengers not the driver
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Eli
Some of you people make me fucking sick. This is NOT Darwinism by any stretch of the imagination. If it would have been one driver, that's fine. The passengers did not deserve to die.
:| Fucking Christ.
you're assuming that they were totally innocent...how do you know they were not egging the driver on?
do you REALLY think this was the drivers first attempt at doing something stupid?
How may stop lights or stop signs do you think they ran?
this kind of irresponsible driving does not just happen over night....I would be willing to bet the driver had a rep for this kind of shit.
sorry.....life's a bitch.....I would rather see these five idiots go up in flames than some mother and her 6 month old hit head on by this fuckwad....sorry but Darwin got it right.
:thumbsup:
The real tragedy is that you have to bring your life's treadmarked baggage into a forum like this. Life must have been a bitch.
Bitter antisocial attention whores really deserve their own board, so if anyone has the audacity to post about anything on it, they can all trash the post, discredit the poster, and insult the responses, and in the process cowardly convincing themselves they're acquiring lots of 'manpoints'.![]()
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's not tragic, it's natural selection.
Silly to say, when only one person made the bad decision.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Ackmed
Originally posted by: BoberFett
That's not tragic, it's natural selection.
Silly to say, when only one person made the bad decision.
Wrong.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
They most likely never saw the train and died without even knowing it was about to happen.Originally posted by: newnameman
Video here.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Exactly. It is plainly visible in the video that the train would have been almost entirely obstructed by trees unless you were very close to the tracks. The car barely slowed down. The four passengers would have had almost no opportunity to react or somehow use their Mighty Power Ranger like reflexes to stop the driver, as some fantasize would be their reaction. Its not the passenger's responsibility to be watching out for road hazards and monitoring the driver, anyway. I would question what the hell a 14 year-old girl was doing in a car with four men ranging from age 17 to 21 (she was dating one of them).Originally posted by: ProfJohn
They most likely never saw the train and died without even knowing it was about to happen.Originally posted by: newnameman
Video here.
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Because they couldn't see the train.Originally posted by: I Saw OJ
I dont understand how this happens. How can you not judge the distance between yourself and the train to determine if there is enough time to cross the tracks?
The driver might have been trying to show off or something stupid. As one story I read said "accidents among teen drivers increase based on the number of people in the car"
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.
At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.
At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:
They will pull the tapes from the engine (nearly all engines that operate on main line track have image recorders and black box recorders).
They overlay the video with the history of all controls being manipulated in the cab of the engine. The investigators will be able to tell what speed the engine was going to within 0.1MPH, when the engineer began to blow the horn, how long the engineer blew the horn, when the bell began to ring, how far from the crossing the gates activated, how long they were down before the crossing was occupied by the engine, etc......
Doubtful they will get very far even if they attempt.
Should have 'killed' his account and then we could have all had a big laugh about it.Originally posted by: CRXican
bad company
she was probably a whore
---------
What the hell is wrong with you? Knock it off.
Moderator Eli
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: jjsole
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: Eli
Some of you people make me fucking sick. This is NOT Darwinism by any stretch of the imagination. If it would have been one driver, that's fine. The passengers did not deserve to die.
:| Fucking Christ.
you're assuming that they were totally innocent...how do you know they were not egging the driver on?
do you REALLY think this was the drivers first attempt at doing something stupid?
How may stop lights or stop signs do you think they ran?
this kind of irresponsible driving does not just happen over night....I would be willing to bet the driver had a rep for this kind of shit.
sorry.....life's a bitch.....I would rather see these five idiots go up in flames than some mother and her 6 month old hit head on by this fuckwad....sorry but Darwin got it right.
:thumbsup:
The real tragedy is that you have to bring your life's treadmarked baggage into a forum like this. Life must have been a bitch.
Bitter antisocial attention whores really deserve their own board, so if anyone has the audacity to post about anything on it, they can all trash the post, discredit the poster, and insult the responses, and in the process cowardly convincing themselves they're acquiring lots of 'manpoints'.![]()
You have issues. Stop projecting.
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Imagine being in the white SUV at the intersection and seeing that happen right in front of you.
At any rate, who wants to bet the families try to sue the train company for not having more barriers/lights/warnings etc.? :roll:
They will pull the tapes from the engine (nearly all engines that operate on main line track have image recorders and black box recorders).
They overlay the video with the history of all controls being manipulated in the cab of the engine. The investigators will be able to tell what speed the engine was going to within 0.1MPH, when the engineer began to blow the horn, how long the engineer blew the horn, when the bell began to ring, how far from the crossing the gates activated, how long they were down before the crossing was occupied by the engine, etc......
Doubtful they will get very far even if they attempt.
I've been wondering for a while about this - what are the fail safe/redundancy system on the gates and crossing lights? Defective crossing gate has a huge chance of turning into a fatality.
Does the engineer know when he's approaching a crossing with a defective gate?
Originally posted by: EMPshockwave82
Fail safe on gate systems are setup to drop the gates on a power loss automatically. They have battery backup systems that should last for 36 hours after a power loss (some of them even have solar panel chargers).
Also, the train dispatcher for the area should be alerted by a railroad employee in charge of the signaling system that there was a power outage and to issue a "stop and protect" order on those crossings in the area. That means that the train has to stop before entering the crossing, the conductor has to get off the engine and walk across ahead of the movement, make sure nothing is coming and command movement through the crossing, then get back on the locomotive.