Intel HD 4000 graphics is comparable to what is in the AMD A4 chip has, using videocardbenchmark.net as a guideline.
That was my understanding, too. That the Haswell iGPU and the AMD FM1 iGPU were of similar performance.
Now, imo, Linux is either used in the simplest manner possible, as in point-click-use, like Android managed to implement, or for nerds who know it in and out. There is NO inbetween.
I'm not sure why you feel that way about Linux. Linux Mint is mostly usable about like Windows 7.
Surely, the user will be able to figure out how to launch Firefox, and possibly even how to update regularly.
Standard warranty is 100 days. If something breaks that is due to defects, you have something instead of nothing.
I can offer a warranty. Since it's free, though, I think something like 30 days is more appropriate.
Benches between i3 2100 vs
A6-3650. The A6 has more cores but can't even win the multithread benches.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/289?vs=403
i3-2100 vs a8-3850
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/289?vs=399
Chop the A8's benchmark in half and that is pretty the approximate benching ability of the A4. If some poor soul wants to use Movie Maker on his meager home video camera, the SSD might provide speed in file loading and transfer, but the encoding will be a win for the i3, hands down.
Ok, so now we've moved the goalposts from a web-browsing / Facebook-level machine, to video-editing, in order to justify an i3? LOL. The A4-3420 web-browses just fine, a friend of mine deployed one for his GF just recently. (Edit: Ok, technically, he deployed an A4-3300, which is mostly the same APU, just running at 2.5Ghz instead of 2.8Ghz.)
Anyways, the SSDs in question that I ordered, benchmark REALLY slowly in write speed, but that might be because they are 90% full. (I had to reduce the test size, because the free space left on the drive after Win10 64-bit 1607 was installed, wasn't enough to run the default test size in CDM.)
Edit: Ok, maybe I'm behind the times, and more people edit video these days than they used to. (YouTube, Facebook, Cell Phone, etc.)
I remember editing video (after capturing it) @ NTSC analog rates, on a 1.4Ghz Athlon XP CPU. (That's back when you had to own a capture card, to do anything with video.)
Surely, a decent dual-core could handle 1080P video.
Edit: But if we're speccing a video-editing machine, AMD FX CPUs are tops there. Forget a sub-standard i3 CPU, you should go with an FX-6300, 6350, 8300, 8320e, etc.