• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Attack on giant Pakistan Buddha

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
The US is only making things worse by murdering innocents and making people hate them.

That does not apply to your military? Either you act against the Taliban and "murder innocents and make people hate you" or you do not act against them and permit the growth of the parasite among the population. Either way you lose.

As for your military, you do not think it is infected like the rest of your population? You have to wonder how many are sympathetic to the cause.

As I said, we don't bomb civilian targets and do not use air cover or artillery. We will not rout out the Taliban at the cost of our civilians. Perhaps you should murder those Americans that support the American war effort to ensure nobody goes on murder sprees from your country.

Nobody supports the Taliban and their ideology except very few. It's just the fact that they hate American more for illegal wars, murders, invasions and their support of Israel. Had the US not invaded Afghanistan, they would have been far more sympathetic and it would have been far easier to find the ones really responsible for 9/11. Now the US has killed thousands of innocents making it far harder for anyone to be sympathetic for them.

Maybe I would get a different response from you if I had said Al-Qaeda instead?

Bin Laden more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan: poll

ISLAMABAD (AFP) - Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden is more popular in Pakistan than President Pervez Musharraf, according to a poll released Wednesday.
The survey "may help explain why Osama bin Laden remains at large in Pakistan and why both al-Qaeda and the Taleban have regrouped there", the group said in a statement.

It said it polled 1,044 people across Pakistan between August 18 and August 29.

Military ruler Musharraf, facing the biggest political crisis of his eight years in power and increasing pressure from Washington to tackle extremism, is the biggest in from the poll.

It said his approval rating was 38 per cent behind 46 per cent for bin Laden, the architect of the September 11, 2001 attacks who is believed to be hiding on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Bin Laden's ratings jumped to 70 per cent in the Islamist-ruled North West Frontier Province.

Musharraf's main rivals, the former prime ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, enjoy favourable opinions of 63 per cent and 57 per cent respectively.
Meanwhile only 13 per cent of people here said they would support US military strikes without Islamabad's cooperation -- a threat issued by several US officials in recent months. But a majority back the Pakistani military, without US support, pursuing al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan, the poll showed.

A mixed bag at the end. Even though Pakistan's people favor Al-Qaeda's leader more than Musharraf most are apparently willing to use their military against al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan. Those two statistics really conflict with each other.

Still the love for Osama more than Musharraf is a telling sign of the trouble Pakistan faces, wouldn?t you agree?

One more thing to consider, they apparently control north/west Pakistan ? and if you aren?t willing to kill all of Al-Qaeda and Taleban supporters their rebellion will live on indefinitely and always pose the risk of growing in population/popularity across the rest of Pakistan. With it being 40% across the country, and 70% across the ?tribal? region, I don?t expect you?ll ever stop them.

What do you think?
 
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
The US is only making things worse by murdering innocents and making people hate them.

That does not apply to your military? Either you act against the Taliban and "murder innocents and make people hate you" or you do not act against them and permit the growth of the parasite among the population. Either way you lose.

As for your military, you do not think it is infected like the rest of your population? You have to wonder how many are sympathetic to the cause.

As I said, we don't bomb civilian targets and do not use air cover or artillery. We will not rout out the Taliban at the cost of our civilians. Perhaps you should murder those Americans that support the American war effort to ensure nobody goes on murder sprees from your country.

Nobody supports the Taliban and their ideology except very few. It's just the fact that they hate American more for illegal wars, murders, invasions and their support of Israel. Had the US not invaded Afghanistan, they would have been far more sympathetic and it would have been far easier to find the ones really responsible for 9/11. Now the US has killed thousands of innocents making it far harder for anyone to be sympathetic for them.

Maybe I would get a different response from you if I had said Al-Qaeda instead?

Bin Laden more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan: poll

ISLAMABAD (AFP) - Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden is more popular in Pakistan than President Pervez Musharraf, according to a poll released Wednesday.
The survey "may help explain why Osama bin Laden remains at large in Pakistan and why both al-Qaeda and the Taleban have regrouped there", the group said in a statement.

It said it polled 1,044 people across Pakistan between August 18 and August 29.

Military ruler Musharraf, facing the biggest political crisis of his eight years in power and increasing pressure from Washington to tackle extremism, is the biggest in from the poll.

It said his approval rating was 38 per cent behind 46 per cent for bin Laden, the architect of the September 11, 2001 attacks who is believed to be hiding on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Bin Laden's ratings jumped to 70 per cent in the Islamist-ruled North West Frontier Province.

Musharraf's main rivals, the former prime ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, enjoy favourable opinions of 63 per cent and 57 per cent respectively.
Meanwhile only 13 per cent of people here said they would support US military strikes without Islamabad's cooperation -- a threat issued by several US officials in recent months. But a majority back the Pakistani military, without US support, pursuing al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan, the poll showed.

A mixed bag at the end. Even though Pakistan's people favor Al-Qaeda's leader more than Musharraf most are apparently willing to use their military against al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan. Those two statistics really conflict with each other.

Still the love for Osama more than Musharraf is a telling sign of the trouble Pakistan faces, wouldn?t you agree?

One more thing to consider, they apparently control north/west Pakistan ? and if you aren?t willing to kill all of Al-Qaeda and Taleban supporters their rebellion will live on indefinitely and always pose the risk of growing in population/popularity across the rest of Pakistan. With it being 40% across the country, and 70% across the ?tribal? region, I don?t expect you?ll ever stop them.

What do you think?
What i think is that NATO needs to work out a deal with Musharraf to use the 'ole hammer and sickle technique in clearing out the northwest frontier region. We can send in our USAF and SOF guys to "push" them toward Pakistan's waiting military forces to the south and east...

Either that, or a scorched earth approach for the entire NW frontier. *BIG BOOMS* problem solved...

Either way, the problem needs to be addressed post haste...
 
Originally posted by: magomago
Stupidity is amazing. The Taliban thinks everything is offensive to Islam...I'm thinking THEY are offensive to Islam

I agree. The Taliban are disgusting and an affront to humanity.
 
Originally posted by: Kadarin
Originally posted by: magomago
Stupidity is amazing. The Taliban thinks everything is offensive to Islam...I'm thinking THEY are offensive to Islam

I agree. The Taliban are disgusting and an affront to humanity.

Eh - this behavior is disgusting, but our nation has many people who are as bad and worse.

You think it would be hard for me to get a few responses in this forum agreeing that the millions of Indochinese killed in our unnecessary Vietnam war are 'no big deal'?

Who turn a blind eye to the many innocents caught up in prisons in the last few years by our nation?

Compare that to the admittedly terrible religious intolerance of the Taliban against a statue. There are some very rose colored glasses people here wear when they throw stones.

I'll agree to the criticism of their action, but not to hypocrisy and double standards in denying or ignoring our own bad behaviors and saying we have nothing like that.
 
Originally posted by: Jaskalas

Maybe I would get a different response from you if I had said Al-Qaeda instead?

Bin Laden more popular than Musharraf in Pakistan: poll

ISLAMABAD (AFP) - Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden is more popular in Pakistan than President Pervez Musharraf, according to a poll released Wednesday.
The survey "may help explain why Osama bin Laden remains at large in Pakistan and why both al-Qaeda and the Taleban have regrouped there", the group said in a statement.

It said it polled 1,044 people across Pakistan between August 18 and August 29.

Military ruler Musharraf, facing the biggest political crisis of his eight years in power and increasing pressure from Washington to tackle extremism, is the biggest in from the poll.

It said his approval rating was 38 per cent behind 46 per cent for bin Laden, the architect of the September 11, 2001 attacks who is believed to be hiding on the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.

Bin Laden's ratings jumped to 70 per cent in the Islamist-ruled North West Frontier Province.

Musharraf's main rivals, the former prime ministers Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, enjoy favourable opinions of 63 per cent and 57 per cent respectively.
Meanwhile only 13 per cent of people here said they would support US military strikes without Islamabad's cooperation -- a threat issued by several US officials in recent months. But a majority back the Pakistani military, without US support, pursuing al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan, the poll showed.

A mixed bag at the end. Even though Pakistan's people favor Al-Qaeda's leader more than Musharraf most are apparently willing to use their military against al-Qaeda and Taleban fighters inside Pakistan. Those two statistics really conflict with each other.

Still the love for Osama more than Musharraf is a telling sign of the trouble Pakistan faces, wouldn?t you agree?

One more thing to consider, they apparently control north/west Pakistan ? and if you aren?t willing to kill all of Al-Qaeda and Taleban supporters their rebellion will live on indefinitely and always pose the risk of growing in population/popularity across the rest of Pakistan. With it being 40% across the country, and 70% across the ?tribal? region, I don?t expect you?ll ever stop them.

What do you think?

Most Pakistani internal conflicts have been based on race, not religion. The Taliban is only popular with the pashtuns who have closed ties with the Afghan pashtuns for obvious reasons. However any action against them will cause other factions to rebel against the federal government and we might have a multi-dimensional civil war with the shiah vs sunni flavour thrown in. But the army is too strong for anyone to even think about realistically take them on without foreign help. And I think in the long term, economical development will mean people put down their arms and get to work.
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
 
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
Well then the joke is on you AND them, because the U.S. is not leaving anytime soon... or ever!

Your countrymen are already befriending the Taliban. That's half the fvcking problem!

Your military needs to destroy them, or we will be forced to do it for you.

It's YOUR choice.

choose wisely...
 
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
hopefully soon any signs of the taliban will be eliminated.

With Iran arming them and Pakistan acting as a complacent host to the parasite - the Taliban aren't going anywhere except the capitals of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

HAHAHA!! You think the taliban can take on the full fury of the Pakistan army

Yeah that amazing Pakistani army that is feared 'round the world. :roll:


Do you pimp that craptastic army every chance you get?
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
Well then the joke is on you AND them, because the U.S. is not leaving anytime soon... or ever!

Your countrymen are already befriending the Taliban. That's half the fvcking problem!

Your military needs to destroy them, or we will be forced to do it for you.

It's YOUR choice.

choose wisely...

You're the one who failed to destroy the Taliban and drove them into Pakistan and now you're asking of us an impossible task. We value our sovereignty and will not accept all American demands. I don't think it would be wise to step foot on Pakistani soil - not after Iraq. Our government has already pledged full resistance to any violation of international law by any terrorist groups. Be it government funded armies or militias. Threatening us won't get anything done. See how your threats against Iran have only made them stronger.

I wouldn't be too worried over American threats. Not even the American people are stupid enough to let their "decider" wage more wars based on lies.
 
I laugh at this palehorse character.
"your military needs to destroy them"

The U.S can't even destroy them in Afghanistan. They control many parts of Afghanistan. Don't talk about another nation doing something when the world's greatest military and power refuses to do so.

Of course when one doesn't have the thinking process that is expected of them, those are the kind of posts you will get.
 
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
Well then the joke is on you AND them, because the U.S. is not leaving anytime soon... or ever!

Your countrymen are already befriending the Taliban. That's half the fvcking problem!

Your military needs to destroy them, or we will be forced to do it for you.

It's YOUR choice.

choose wisely...

Our government has already pledged full resistance to any violation of international law by any terrorist groups. Be it government funded armies or militias.

So then why arnt they doing anything? 😕

 
Originally posted by: Aimster
I laugh at this palehorse character.
"your military needs to destroy them"

The U.S can't even destroy them in Afghanistan. They control many parts of Afghanistan. Don't talk about another nation doing something when the world's greatest military and power refuses to do so.

Of course when one doesn't have the thinking process that is expected of them, those are the kind of posts you will get.

:laugh: :thumbsup:
 
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
Well then the joke is on you AND them, because the U.S. is not leaving anytime soon... or ever!

Your countrymen are already befriending the Taliban. That's half the fvcking problem!

Your military needs to destroy them, or we will be forced to do it for you.

It's YOUR choice.

choose wisely...

Our government has already pledged full resistance to any violation of international law by any terrorist groups. Be it government funded armies or militias.

So then why arnt they doing anything? 😕

Are all americans kept in the dark? Have you never heard about the Waziristan war?
 
Originally posted by: Aimster
I laugh at this palehorse character.
"your military needs to destroy them"

The U.S can't even destroy them in Afghanistan. They control many parts of Afghanistan. Don't talk about another nation doing something when the world's greatest military and power refuses to do so.

Of course when one doesn't have the thinking process that is expected of them, those are the kind of posts you will get.
Name one province in Afghanistan that is controlled by the Taliban. Shouldn't be too hard for you since "they control many parts"... right?

Please Aimster, fire up both of your braincells, and drop some knowledge on me. I'll wait patiently while you scour the far reaches of the Internet for the an answer... but please, don't get lost!
 
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: nick1985
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Originally posted by: The Green Bean
Originally posted by: palehorse74
LOL... you are assuming that you'd even be able to find out guys on the ground. Annihilating the Taliban in NW Pakistan would NOT require an "invasion," rather, all we need is our SOF and USAF to handle them one village at a time until every Taliban safehold is a steaming pile of rubble.

And Pakistan can't/won't do jack-shit to stop us.

That said, I'd give everything I own to see Pakistan take care of the Taliban themselves. But, I just don't think they are capable of doing so, or willing to even try.

All that will do is make the taliban move out of the mountains into our cities. Then what?
You've hit on the best part of the plan.. at that point, they'll be too far away from Afghanistan to continue hindering NATO efforts, annnnd, here's the brilliant part, Pakistan will be FORCED to deal with them! HA!

good stuff!

Can you please redefine what the"NATO efforts" are? I had the notion their efforts were to destroy Alqaeeda not drive them to Pakistani cities where if left alone, they will be back to haunt the US. When the US withdraws we shall befriend them 😉 good stuff! Have you realized how this war is being waged against the Taliban in Pakistan? Neither side is willing to kill. We can't wait for the US to leave so the bloodshed can stop.
Well then the joke is on you AND them, because the U.S. is not leaving anytime soon... or ever!

Your countrymen are already befriending the Taliban. That's half the fvcking problem!

Your military needs to destroy them, or we will be forced to do it for you.

It's YOUR choice.

choose wisely...

Our government has already pledged full resistance to any violation of international law by any terrorist groups. Be it government funded armies or militias.

So then why arnt they doing anything? 😕

Are all americans kept in the dark? Have you never heard about the Waziristan war?


Text

Just now reading up.

"A Pakistan writer, Ayaz Amir states that the army's "Casualties were high, perhaps unsustainable, although we?ll never know the exact figures, the Pakistan army not given to embarrassing disclosures"

"Imran Khan, leader of a Pakistani oppositional political party stated: "Waziristan has been a disaster; there?s been a disgraceful withdrawal from there. The Pakistan Army has been defeated."

Looks like its going great. :thumbsup:

 
Are you ready to be proven wrong again Mr.Palehorse?

Braincells? I actually went to a university where I know what it is like to think and use my braincells. You waste your life on the Internet looking at gun forums and browsing "Islam is Bad" on google search. You sure know how it is like to use your braincells.

Like I said, you should just type blah blah for all your posts. Your posts serve no purpose and are filled with junk. You are a nobody yet you think you are a somebody and you actually believe your WORD means something. Your word is complete GARBAGE.

Taliban back in strategic areas around Kandahar
http://www.canada.com/topics/n...42f5-9a5c-7ef700008b09

Afghan officials: Taliban have control of towns in south
http://www.usatoday.com/news/w...06-07-17-taliban_x.htm

Taleban forces retake Afghan town
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6324409.stm

Taliban seizes control of area in south Afghanistan
http://www.taipeitimes.com/New.../2007/06/20/2003366050

"In the southern province of Helmand, where Taliban insurgents control several districts"
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=74153


Don't cry it's oK. Mission FAILED.
 
Originally posted by: Aimster
Are you ready to be proven wrong again Mr.Palehorse?

Braincells? I actually went to a university where I know what it is like to think and use my braincells. You waste your life on the Internet looking at gun forums and browsing "Islam is Bad" on google search. You sure know how it is like to use your braincells.

Like I said, you should just type blah blah for all your posts. Your posts serve no purpose and are filled with junk. You are a nobody yet you think you are a somebody and you actually believe your WORD means something. Your word is complete GARBAGE.

Taliban back in strategic areas around Kandahar
http://www.canada.com/topics/n...42f5-9a5c-7ef700008b09

Afghan officials: Taliban have control of towns in south
http://www.usatoday.com/news/w...06-07-17-taliban_x.htm

Taleban forces retake Afghan town
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6324409.stm

Taliban seizes control of area in south Afghanistan
http://www.taipeitimes.com/New.../2007/06/20/2003366050

"In the southern province of Helmand, where Taliban insurgents control several districts"
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=74153


Don't cry it's oK. Mission FAILED.
Apparently you have no idea what the difference is between a province and a district in Afghanistan - and the relative size of each.

Afghan "Districts" consist of approx 2-3 villages.
Afghan "Provinces" consist of HUNDREDS of "districts."

The Taliban only control a handful of districts throughout the entire country.

These are things you might have known if you ever left your parents' basement.

You also need to learn how to read.
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Name one province in Afghanistan that is controlled by the Taliban.
 
left my parent's basement?

I'm sorry but in America when you get an education you usually leave your parent's basement. I know nobody around you has an education but that's perfectly OK. You learn something every day. Maybe your kids will be the first ones in your family to go to school.

The fact is the Taliban control MANY parts of Afghanistan. Not just 2-3 districts. Are you kidding me?? Read the articles. They have control of Afghanistan in many places. Not just a handful of districts. LOL. There are not even enough troops in Afghanistan to control the areas from Taliban control. It is so easy for them to regain power. Use common sense rather than "U.S Number 1 we rule" thinking.
I know the articles are boring to you because they do not talk about Islam being evil, but fight your ADD and actually put some effort into it.
 
Originally posted by: Aimster
left my parent's basement?

I'm sorry but in America when you get an education you usually leave your parent's basement. I know nobody around you has an education but that's perfectly OK. You learn something every day. Maybe your kids will be the first ones in your family to go to school.

The fact is the Taliban control MANY parts of Afghanistan. Not just 2-3 districts. Are you kidding me?? Read the articles. They have control of Afghanistan in many places. Not just a handful of districts. LOL. There are not even enough troops in Afghanistan to control the areas from Taliban control. It is so easy for them to regain power. Use common sense rather than "U.S Number 1 we rule" thinking.
I know the articles are boring to you because they do not talk about Islam being evil, but fight your ADD and actually put some effort into it.
1) I do not believe that you are old enough to have graduated High School, let alone college. You emotial temper tantrums here remind me of a kid whose parents won't buy him the toy he wants.

2) I have several degrees... and counting, including a "focus" on Islam and terrorism in my current curriculum.

3) I have, so far, spent more than 12 months in and aorund Afghanistan.

4) The Taliban control SOME of the more remote districts in Afghanistan, most often those closest to the border with Pakistan. (You figure that one out)

5) I have never claimed that Islam is evil, and I am actually one of the few righties around here who defends Islam on a regular basis. I'm sick of pointing this fact out to you.

grow up.
 
So if you think I am not old enough to graduate high school, why are you debating with me?
You waste your life debating with a teenage kid who lives with his parent's in their basement? You aren't that bright at all.

I don't give a rat's ass if you went to Afghanistan for 1 day or 10 years. What did you do there? You know what's funny? If I signed up for the military right now.. I would be your boss. That's right. Aimster = Palehorse74's boss. So stop showing off that you went to Afghanistan as if that makes a difference at all .

& your claim that a district is "just a few small villages" is a big joke. A district is comparable to the size of a county in the United States. They usually have tens of thousands of people. Here let me educate you since you obviously fail at most of the thinking you do in life.
When the article says HUNDREDS of schools closed as a result of the Taliban, how big of an area do you think that is? Now I know you grew up in the country with your cows and possibly chicken, and you only had like 3 schools around you. Just to help you out, where I live there are about 3 schools in a 5 male radius.

You can do it. Take some Vitamin B-6 or B-12. It might help you WAKE UP.

But why respond to me? I am a teenage boy living in my parent's basement. Also you called me a terrorist too.
So do you really care what this teenage terrorist has to say about your thinking abilities?
 
Back
Top