The idea is mostly for redundancy than performance. If a drive dies you just pop a new one in with no downtime. With SSDs I'd probably use raid 5/6 instead of raid 10 as well, though not sure what is typically done for SSDs and raid. I kinda want to see what the rebuild time would be on a raid 5 using SSDs though... I bet it would be awesome.
Though something like ZFS probably makes more sense than raid. I still need to experiment with that one day. ZFS has a bit of extra overhead but with SSDs you would probably not even see that. When the actual SATA bus becomes the bottleneck, then you're doing pretty good.