++ ATOT official NEF thread part IV ++

[Barfo]

 

[Barfo]

 

[Barfo]

:whiste::whiste::whiste:

 

[Barfo]

Health and Fitness

 

[Barfo]

Video Cards and Graphics[URL="http://forums.anandtech.com/index.php"]AnandTech Forums[/URL]

 

[Barfo]

MotF Bane 10,364
eldorado99 8,943
alfa147x 8,362
sdifox 7,637
Barfo 6,896
SaDiZTiKStyLeZ 5,828
zzuupp 4,829
IndyColtsFan 4,396
Mixolydian 4,278
Gothgar 3,042
rudeguy 1,598
Locut0s 1,466
mnewsham 1,293
shortylickens 1,187
busydude 1,068
Rubycon 936
loki8481 857
fjmeat 788
Scholzpdx 714
BTRY B 529th FA BN 613
Red Squirrel 526
T_Yamamoto 377
Wanescotting 362
MontyAC 330
RPD 259
janas19 246
bigrash 235
Silver Prime 235

 

[mnewsham]

nef

 

[suklee]

nef

 

[Red Squirrel]

 

[Red Squirrel]

Wow that's weird my second post went through faster than the first. The first is still waiting...

 

[Red Squirrel]

Actually the first never went through at all. This forum is weird.

 

[Mixolydian]

Actually the first never went through at all. This forum is weird.

Stop using the Quick Reply box at the bottom. It works just fine if you click the "Post Reply" button which takes you to another page to compose your post.

 

[Red Squirrel]

Really? That's interesting.

 

[Red Squirrel]

Wow you're right. I don't get why one method would be slower than the other though, but who knows.

 

[Red Squirrel]

I should probably go to bed, it's like 4am. :awe:

 

[suklee]

nef

 

[zzuupp]

nef

 

[zzuupp]

nef

 

[suklee]

nef

 

[Broheim]

Wow you're right. I don't get why one method would be slower than the other though, but who knows.

without looking at the code, my guess is someone took a design short cut when implementing quick reply validation and simply didn't foresee a thread this size.

 

[rudeguy]

work nef

 

[mnewsham]

neff

 

[mnewsham]

fen

 

[mnewsham]

narf

 

[mnewsham]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm374yQLe10



80,000k