++ ATOT official NEF thread part IV ++

Page 3200 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Barfo

Lifer
Jan 4, 2005
27,554
210
106
MotF Bane 10,364
eldorado99 8,943
alfa147x 8,362
sdifox 7,637
Barfo 6,896
SaDiZTiKStyLeZ 5,828
zzuupp 4,829
IndyColtsFan 4,396
Mixolydian 4,278
Gothgar 3,042
rudeguy 1,598
Locut0s 1,466
mnewsham 1,293
shortylickens 1,187
busydude 1,068
Rubycon 936
loki8481 857
fjmeat 788
Scholzpdx 714
BTRY B 529th FA BN 613
Red Squirrel 526
T_Yamamoto 377
Wanescotting 362
MontyAC 330
RPD 259
janas19 246
bigrash 235
Silver Prime 235
 

Broheim

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2011
4,592
2
81
Wow you're right. I don't get why one method would be slower than the other though, but who knows.
without looking at the code, my guess is someone took a design short cut when implementing quick reply validation and simply didn't foresee a thread this size.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY