++ ATOT official NEF thread part IV ++

Page 569 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Everyone that remembers 3DFX should recall the blurrieness, right? Well that was their way of presenting objects they could not render - conceal the hardware's shortcomings by blurring it out! :biggrin:
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Everyone that remembers 3DFX should recall the blurrieness, right? Well that was their way of presenting objects they could not render - conceal the hardware's shortcomings by blurring it out! :biggrin:

Oh yes, that and the color depth/vividness were always the arguments going back and forth between 3dfx and nVidia fanboys.
 

Barfo

Lifer
Jan 4, 2005
27,539
212
106
ExYsm.jpg
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Oh yes, that and the color depth/vividness were always the arguments going back and forth between 3dfx and nVidia fanboys.

Well when NV became a real player in 1999 (IMHO) with their TNT2 having texture support > 256x256 was very important particularly in the new release QuakeIII. While the Voodoo3 family was quick on the framerate counter the detail (or lack of) was quite apparent stepping up to a TNT2 ultra. It was like comparing pictures with digital zoom. It looked that much worse on the Voodoo3 part. That was just the beginning. When Geforce 256 parts with DDR support came out in late '99 it was apparent that 3DFX was in big trouble.

Oh yeah socket 8 - the beloved dual Pentium Pro system - was the reason for me to hold on to a (non AGP) system for so long.
I was also reluctant to jump over to PCI-E for the same reason. (using server express chipset boards - 7505 dual socket 604)
 
Last edited: