• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATOT, are you smarter than my 3rd grader?

This is a problem from my daughter’s homework last night. The teacher contends that her answer is incorrect. Let’s see what answer you get.

Jane wishes to organize a pet parade. Every row in the parade will have some combination of owners and pets. In the 1st row, Jane puts 1 owner and 1 pet. In the 2nd row, Jane puts 2 owners with 1 pet each. In the 3rd row, Jane puts 1 owner with 2 pets. In the 4th row, Jane puts 2 owners with 2 pets each. In the 5th row, Jane puts 1 owner with 3 pets. If the pattern continues, how many owners and pets will there be in the 6th row?

the answer she got was:
2 owners, 3 pets each.

the teacher
crossed out the "2" and wrote "3", making the answer, presumably "3 owners, 3 pets each".
 
Last edited:
2 owners 3 pets

pets.png
 
Last edited:
row,owners,pets
1,1,1
2,2,1
3,1,2
4,2,2
5,1,3
6,?,?

My first guess is 3,1, but now that I lay it out - 2,3 makes the most logical sense. Teachers answer does not. I'm onboard the teacher is a moron club.
 
Last edited:
row,owners,pets
1,1,1
2,2,2
3,1,2
4,2,2
5,1,3
6,?,?

My first guess is 3,1, but now that I lay it out - 2,3 makes the most logical sense. 3,3 does not. I'm onboard the teacher is a moron club.
FTFY...row two has 2 owners with 1 pet each

Edit: nm, I'm wrong...
 
we actually really like the teacher but it seems that in this case she is probably just following the answer key. this would hopefully bring about an opportunity to further instruct the class on how the answer was determined.
 
If the pattern continues, how many owners and pets will there be in the 6th row?

The question is asking for the TOTAL number of pets, not the number of pets per owner.

There will be 2 owners, and 6 pets.

Not 3 pets like you all are saying. It's 3 pets per owner, for a total of 6 pets.
 
The question is asking for the TOTAL number of pets, not the number of pets per owner.

There will be 2 owners, and 6 pets.

Not 3 pets like you all are saying. It's 3 pets per owner, for a total of 6 pets.
It doesn't specify "total," and as such, continuing to phrase it as the question did - "X owners, Y dogs each" seems acceptable.

Although yes, those saying "X owners, Y dogs" here when they mean "each" is misleading.
 
either answer (2 owners w/ 3 pets each or 3 owners w/ 3 pets each) would fit in the (barely) established pattern.

Sounds like most of the class will probably get the wrong answer. If the teacher is worth their salt, they'll probably discuss the question in class for a minute and give credit for the "wrong" answer.
 
Even rows are just 2x the row before it. Since row 5 is 1owner, 3 pets; row 6 should be 2 owners, 6 pets.

either answer (2 owners w/ 3 pets each or 3 owners w/ 3 pets each) would fit in the (barely) established pattern.

Sounds like most of the class will probably get the wrong answer. If the teacher is worth their salt, they'll probably discuss the question in class for a minute and give credit for the "wrong" answer.

How do you figure 3/3 fits?
 
Back
Top