Possibly by division...
row 2 is 2 pets and 2 owners...2/2=1
row 4 is 4 pets and 2 owners...4/2=2
row 6 is 9 pets and 3 owners...9/3=3
If that's it this should not be presented in the third grade
Touche...row 6 is 6 pets and 2 owners.. 6/2=3
This is a problem from my daughters homework last night. The teacher contends that her answer is incorrect. Lets see what answer you get.
Jane wishes to organize a pet parade. Every row in the parade will have some combination of owners and pets. In the 1st row, Jane puts 1 owner and 1 pet. In the 2nd row, Jane puts 2 owners with 1 pet each. In the 3rd row, Jane puts 1 owner with 2 pets. In the 4th row, Jane puts 2 owners with 2 pets each. In the 5th row, Jane puts 1 owner with 3 pets. If the pattern continues, how many owners and pets will there be in the 6th row?
the answer she got was:2 owners, 3 pets each.
the teachercrossed out the "2" and wrote "3", making the answer, presumably "3 owners, 3 pets each".
not hard. you never specified the regions had to be equal in area.Both answers are equally valid, as are other answers.
Here's a sequence: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, what's next?
The correct answer for the sequence I'm thinking of is 31. 1 + nC2 + nC4
(connecting n points on the circumference of a circle with chords, what is the maximum number of regions formed by those chords?)
Of course, after my class establishes a pattern & thinks the answer for 6 points is 32 regions, their homework assignment is to draw a circle divided into 32 regions. I'm a jerk.![]()
![]()
it could be either. more iterations are required to know the pattern.
IMO this isn't a restricted enough pattern to flat out say one and only one answer is right. The teacher should ask the kid why she chose that answer, and if she had a different pattern that she was following she still gets the concept... so is right.
Using division...How would 3 be the correct answer? What iteration would lead to that?
Using division...
row 2 is 2 pets and 2 owners...2/2=1
row 4 is 4 pets and 2 owners...4/2=2
row 6 is 9 pets and 3 owners...9/3=3 or 6 pets and 2 owners...6/2=3
In my experience most primary school teachers are pretty horrible at teaching actual content...maybe the smarter ones teach secondary or tertiary students...?
The teacher is wrong in this case, but the important issue is whether they admit they were wrong and correct the issue. Everyone's wrong once in a while; what matters is how they deal with it.
In my experience most primary school teachers are pretty horrible at teaching actual content...maybe the smarter ones teach secondary or tertiary students...?
The teacher is wrong in this case, but the important issue is whether they admit they were wrong and correct the issue. Everyone's wrong once in a while; what matters is how they deal with it.
YesThus there would be no one correct answer. Certainly, the teacher cannot say that 2 is wrong and 3 is right, thus, the teacher is still wrong.
