ATi's CCC: Not the greatest but not that bad either.

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

beggerking

Golden Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,703
0
0
All I'm trying to prove here is that a bloated program is a bloated program. It is better to not keep it in memory unless it is absolutely required.
if you go back and read mattias's post, you'll know what we were discussing.

people have reported to score lower with CCC enabled.
oh well..
 

rbV5

Lifer
Dec 10, 2000
12,632
0
0
Originally posted by: beggerking
All I'm trying to prove here is that a bloated program is a bloated program. It is better to not keep it in memory unless it is absolutely required.
if you go back and read mattias's post, you'll know what we were discussing.

people have reported to score lower with CCC enabled.
oh well..

I know what you're discussing, but you are trying to prove something the long way that is easily proved by "benchmarks". Sure users may have 20 point differences in 3Dmark, but I myself have yet to see "real" differences in "real" gaming benchmarks (including 3Dmark btw) with CCC installed or not, simple as that....
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,499
560
126
So I got my XT in yesterday. Tried without CCC, and then with. I got .3 FPS difference in the X3 demo. With CCC being .3 faster. Obviously thats well within the margin of error, but proves to me that CCC doesnt slow down anything. Case closed.