ATI Radeon X1400(256MB) OR nVidia 7300(128MB)?

[morland]

Hi,

Can someone kindly advise as to which one (amongst ATI Radeon X1400 or nVidia 7300) is a better graphics card.

Thanks.

 

[Arkaign]

They're both absolutely terrible. What are you trying to do with it?

If gaming is any part of the answer, then go directly to the FS/FT forums and find at least a 6600GT or X800 series card, which can be done for less than $50 if you're patient.

If you're just wanting something to run Windows Vista, 2d, and general video playback (non-HD), then the X1400/7300 will be at least usable.

 

[zealit]

My guess is it's for a laptop... Anyways, the X1400 is way better than the 7300.

 

[morland]

HI,

Thank you for the replies.

zealit's guess is correct. The vendor from whom I am buying a laptop is offering me to choose either of these since the "bundle/package" which he is selling me includes either of these...

So should I go with X1400 with the understanding that X1400 is somewhat less terrible 😉?

 

[Arkaign]

Gaming or no?

 

[Arkaign]

If gaming is your bag, you can get an awesome deal on a Qosmio G25, they have a Geforce Go 6600, which will run rings around the X1400, along with a 17" screen, etc. Best deal you're likely to find on a gaming notebook. Go 6600 is fast enough to play most titles at medium settings, and older games in full stride.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Toshiba-Qo...VWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Though .. if gaming is not the point, then the X1400 should suffice.

Look at this :

http://www.anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=2766&p=8

X1400 gets 14fps with NO AA @ 1440x900 in Battlefield 2, a fairly old game these days. Just atrocious.

 

[Arkaign]

Bleh, read more of the AT review, the X1400 can't even break 20fps in Far Cry, making it worthless even for 5 year old games.

 

[RajunCajun]

I bought a new Dell e1505 couple mons ago with the 7300. The Inspiron 6400 is identical to 1505, except they offer the 7300 or X1400 (1505 only had X1300). From what I read the X1400 is faster, but don't know if it's very much faster. I didn't buy it to game with (see below), but for the heck of it I loaded some games. Here are my impressions of the 7300 with 1gig memory & CoreDuo @ 1.86mhz and 1280x800 LCD running at native resolution: (note no AA on)

Older Games:
Call of Duty & Call of Duty-United Offensive - maxed out with 8x AF runs smooth as glass.

Newer Games:
Call of Duty 2 - kinda slow & choppy with DX9 and medium settings. DX7 with settings maxed out & 4x AF smooth as glass (this is essentially same as original COD).

Far Cry - With medium settings & 2x AF runs VERY well, much better than I thought.

Half Life 2 - maxed setting runs smooth, but there are pauses at times which I cannot fix (this happened on my desktop when I first go it - upgrading ram to 1.5gig cured it)

Quake 4 - medium settings, no AF very smooth, although there may be times it'll slow down some, but nothing you can't play through.

Don't buy these to play the newest games - you'll be sorely disappointed if you try with everything maxed. But with low settings it'll do OK. I imagine the x1400 would do marginally better, but I don't think it'll be drastic.

 

[Arkaign]

From what you're saying, I'm thinking the Go 7300 is actually better than the X1400, which puts out just ghastly numbers. Less than 10fps in COD2 @ 1440x900, no AA.

 

[morland]

Thanks all. Appreciate your useful replies.