• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

ATI Radeon 10000

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The competition between ATI and Nvidia is fiercer than ever. In every aspect of the pc graphic market, chipsets, and in consoles as well.

I think that ATI needs to really work on their driver support. I dont think that they have terrible support, but I just think it is Nvidia's great driver support that just outshines ATI.
 


<<

<< Personally i'd like to know what the heck your talking about? I personally have 3 Radeon 8500's and they flat out rock. I really enjoy the image quality and the performace of the Ti500 it has. I'm not sure how you can consider that a disappointment (other than maybe you have no clue what your talking about). >>



Have you owned a Ti500? Have you actually owned BOTH cards? Probably not. Sure Radeon8500 is cheap and fast. But at what cost? I mean the driver is buggy (much better now). I think this is called you get what you paid for. Performance wise, it is still below Ti500. >>



April 1st is over !!!

Btw. your wording is kinda "bizarre": "The driver is buggy [much better now]" !

If you talk about the GF Ti, do you also mention that some nvidia drivers from the early 90's were very 'buggy' ?
At least talking about ATI (for some reason) it seems to play an important role that "earlier drivers were buggy"...and you cannot even admit that the recent drivers are quite ok now...except putting a fuzzy comment in brackets 🙂 🙂

Btw. if you paid "more money" prolly for a ti 500...you seriously think you got "more" for your more spent money ?

Besides..we could of course spend same time now debating whether the gf3 ti 500 REALLY is superior to the 8500...

 


<< The competition between ATI and Nvidia is fiercer than ever. In every aspect of the pc graphic market, chipsets, and in consoles as well.

I think that ATI needs to really work on their driver support. I dont think that they have terrible support, but I just think it is Nvidia's great driver support that just outshines ATI. >>



I think that ATI actually did a good job with their drivers...it was kinda slow start with people having to wait a long time...but since i downloaded every single beta and/or leaked driver and tested them i can NOT complain about a lack of available drivers. More to test/benchmark than one could want...in addition to many "hacks" eg. user made their own drivers by mixing various versions and releasing them. (Never tried them, tho 🙂

I have no reason to complain...especially since the 9021 drivers (for 98) or the 6043 drivers (for XP)....everything runs fine for me.

About the naming:

Hm.....Radeon 10000 sounds kinda retarded... i don't know 🙂

I never associated their versions with the release of DirectX...but now since you mention it...hmmm.....

Radeon 9000 would make more sense of course....
 
I reckon they should stick with the 9xxx convention also. What's happening with the R250V or whatever?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top