Question.
What's the point in 'debating' (It's more like a childish argument) which card is better? The figures for stock clock/mem speeds should speak for themselves, people have personal preferences, and that's the end of that, surely.
Example: You won't catch me touching nVidia cards, even with a barge pole, but I'm not about to go and say "OMGBUYATINVIDIASUCK". Which, by the way, is what a lot of this boils down to (reverse the names for each individual preference).
Everyone's being hung up on Rollo being an nVidia fan. Who cares what he puts in his case, it's not like him having a preference and being opinionated and quite willing to take every opertunaty to take a crack at ATI is going to stop people buying ATI, is it? Imagine that, though. "Oh, damn man, you can't buy that card, Rollo said it's bad!"
Can anyone imagine the response? "Sod off, I want it, I'm buying it" springs to mind.
A large number of people accuse Rollo of flame-baiting, but a large number of the acusors are no better, they're targeting it towards Rollo himself. Okay, some do it all in good humour, and Rollo seems to be able to recognise that (sometimes). but why should he have to?
Also. I laugh at the OP, who seems to have just.. Disappeared from the forums when his argument got shot to bits.
Another point: Noise level of the cards stock cooler is easily evaded by buying a cooler that doesn't make so much noise, if you're that concerned about it. If you think you shouldn't have to, start being prepared to pay another $100+ for the card to come with a really good quiet cooler.
My pc is hardly loud, but when I crank the fan speeds up it gets a bit noisy. But guess what. I'm playing games. And they're louder than the pc.