Originally posted by: Wolfsraider
looks like they are right on schedule🙂
Originally posted by: LukFilm
So if the MHz rating of 9700 Pro is 325/310, what's the rating of regular 9700? 😕
Probably between 275-300 - I'd say closer to 275.Originally posted by: LukFilm
So if the MHz rating of 9700 Pro is 325/310, what's the rating of regular 9700? 😕
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Me being the non-informed-on- ATI guy, I'll ask this question.
How will (theoretically) the 9700Pro compare with a GF4 TI 4600? Currently my GF3 64mb is humming along quite nicely (having a fast CPU helps) but I do plan on getting UT2K3 very soon and highly doubt I'll be able to play it at my preferred 1152x864 resolution.
I smell a videocard purchase sometime in the near future!
Originally posted by: NFS4
So was the card AT tested the "Pro"?😕
By the time you read this, ATI still will not have decided on the clock speeds for the R300, but the card we tested was running at a core clock of 325MHz. Officially, ATI is shooting for above a 300MHz core clock and from our discussions with them it seems like they are realistically aiming for at least the 325MHz with which we tested.
Originally posted by: Pabster
NV30 will destroy 9700 (Pro or not)