This also caught my eye:
"Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Is that just marketing fluff or is there something to it?
Originally posted by: CP5670
This also caught my eye:
"Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Is that just marketing fluff or is there something to it?
Originally posted by: WelshBloke
'On the other hand, our relationship with Intel is going to become much more intimate than before.'
Thats never a good position to be in.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Originally posted by: CP5670
This also caught my eye:
"Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Is that just marketing fluff or is there something to it?
Over half a billion transistors straight from the horse's mouth. 80nm, and according to some B3D members, it could be around 300mm^2 big. New AA engine, and alot of new patents from NV regarding all sorts of stuff.
G80/NV50 is a mystery.. if your interested read the discussion going at B3D. Very interesting.
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Originally posted by: CP5670
This also caught my eye:
"Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Is that just marketing fluff or is there something to it?
Over half a billion transistors straight from the horse's mouth. 80nm, and according to some B3D members, it could be around 300mm^2 big. New AA engine, and alot of new patents from NV regarding all sorts of stuff.
G80/NV50 is a mystery.. if your interested read the discussion going at B3D. Very interesting.
I was looking forward to the G80 vs R600 battle. Now I am wondering if the battle has already been decided in a boardroom.![]()
Wow. This must be true, NVDA would never, ever exaggerate anything."Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Originally posted by: CP5670
This also caught my eye:
"Meantime, Nvidia is prepping to deliver a new high-end graphics chip later this year that company executives herald as the biggest leap forward in nearly a decade."
Is that just marketing fluff or is there something to it?
Originally posted by: josh6079
So is this a buy out, or a merger? Is ATI going to be left intact but exist as a sort of sub-department or is it going to transcend into AMD as a whole?
Originally posted by: Janooo
The ATI GPU know how is too good to be scrapped or sold. ATI is profitable; why would AMD get rid of it? The fight for the GPU market share will be between Intel and AMD
Originally posted by: WelshBloke
'On the other hand, our relationship with Intel is going to become much more intimate than before.'
Thats never a good position to be in.
It could potentially be running by 2010.New York government officials proposed a $1 billion package of incentives to lure AMD to the state
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: Janooo
The ATI GPU know how is too good to be scrapped or sold. ATI is profitable; why would AMD get rid of it? The fight for the GPU market share will be between Intel and AMD
Sales 2.31 Bil
Income -33.90 Mil
Net Profit Margin -1.50%
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: Janooo
The ATI GPU know how is too good to be scrapped or sold. ATI is profitable; why would AMD get rid of it? The fight for the GPU market share will be between Intel and AMD
Sales 2.31 Bil
Income -33.90 Mil
Net Profit Margin -1.50%
Originally posted by: Janooo
Originally posted by: Lonyo
Originally posted by: Janooo
The ATI GPU know how is too good to be scrapped or sold. ATI is profitable; why would AMD get rid of it? The fight for the GPU market share will be between Intel and AMD
Sales 2.31 Bil
Income -33.90 Mil
Net Profit Margin -1.50%
From nasdaq; numbers are in 000's:
Period Ending: 8/31/2005 8/31/2004 8/31/2003 8/31/2002
Total Revenue $2,222,509 $1,996,717 $1,385,293 $1,021,722
Cost of Revenue $1,608,582 $1,299,597 $952,001 $686,210
Gross Profit $613,927 $697,120 $433,292 $335,512
Operating Expenses
Research and Development $327,017 $269,909 $212,976 $164,609
Sales, General and Admin. $250,664 $181,248 $161,824 $112,734
Non-Recurring Items $2,508 ($304) $28,724 $5,300
Other Operating Items $8,919 $6,115 $6,350 $88,781
Operating Income $24,819 $240,152 $23,418 ($35,912)
Add'l income/expense items $39,682 ($4,229) $4,476 $732
Earnings Before Interest and Tax $64,501 $235,923 $27,894 ($35,180)
Interest Expense $2,096 $2,058 $1,899 $659
Earnings Before Tax $62,405 $233,865 $25,995 ($35,839)
Income Tax $20,729 $45,824 $13,824 $9,077
Net Income-Cont. Operations $41,676 $188,041 $12,171 ($44,916)
Net Income $41,676 $188,041 $12,171 ($44,916)
Net Income Applicable to
Common Shareholders $41,676 $188,041 $12,171 ($44,916)
Originally posted by: Modular
Originally posted by: WelshBloke
'On the other hand, our relationship with Intel is going to become much more intimate than before.'
Thats never a good position to be in.
Considering Conroe is due out in a few weeks, it's a damn good position to be in.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Dont forget companies like XGI and S3..
The recent course of events is like hell freezing over.