thilanliyan
Lifer
- Jun 21, 2005
- 12,065
- 2,278
- 126
Originally posted by: ElFenix
i'm still trying to figure out why everyone is assuming ati will leave the discrete graphics industry. it looks like they'd be the most profitable unit at AMD, given those numbers just posted and the fact that amd is going to have to slash margins with conroe around. the graphics margins they could maintain (improve, actually, given their fabbing expertise).
here's what amd will be able to offer: the processor, the chipset with or without integrated graphics, and a discrete graphics card, all in one package. that's better than intel. why they would want to get rid of one of their advantages over intel is beyond me.
not to mention the fact that they'll probably want part of the xbox720/ps4/nintendo evolution market, which will require them to continue investing in the highend graphics sector. why wouldn't they want to leverage that into discrete graphics? (ati did, and it got them the 9700 pro)
seems like the rumors are being started by nvidiots trying to proclaim victory in some childish form.
I hope you're right. It'll suck if there's only one player in the high end GPU race. From what I've read I get the same impression as you but I'm wondering is if they'll continue to make high end GPUs after say 2 years.
