Atheists Call 9-11 Memorial Cross "Grossly Offensive"

[ThinClient]

You're funny, and you're trying so hard to "strike a nerve", and you think you have because I've chosen to ignore you.

Carry on, your not built for it.

*continues to ignore*

You know what's funny? I'm not trying to strike a nerve with you. I'm simply an offensive fellow. It's how I handle everyone. However, you're so arrogant that you think I'm making a special effort for you.

Additionally, I like how you LIED that you were going to ignore me earlier and have now proven yourself to be un-christlike.

Now STFU and watch this. Better yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok_tcAEbHHw

 

[JD50]

LOL so you left religion because it "looked silly" to believe in god?

How old are you, 12?

Fwiw, I'll stop believing when I find a "reason" to -- not because I'm scared of how others view it.

Yes that is one of the reasons. The stories in the bible are absolutely ridiculous. It has nothing to do with me being scared of how others view it.

Funny that you ask if I'm a child since generally it's children that so easily believe in fairy tales.

 

[buckshot24]

By your own logic, there is no evidence that we DIDN'T come from a lifeless planet. 🙄

Is there evidence or not?

Life is inevitable.

Based on what? Your faith? This sounds more like a creedal statement than anything a naturalist should say.

Stars explode, their star dust coalesces, with the right mix of compounds, poof life can be born. Obviously. 🙂

Yup, you're the "reasonable" one where logic and evidence is all that you go on.🙄

Are you claiming it couldn't have happened because you didn't observe it?

No, I'm claiming that there isn't any evidence that it happened. Why should I believe it?

 

[buckshot24]

Is it your belief that life was always on this planet?

Is it your belief that human brains were always on this planet?



Define "living organism."



Quite frankly, you're utterly full of shit.

Where is the evidence?

 

[buckshot24]

There's been plenty of evidence for your mental state throughout this very thread. 😉

Hypocrite.

 

[buckshot24]

Additionally, I like how you LIED that you were going to ignore me earlier and have now proven yourself to be un-christlike.

I sympathize, every once in a while you're almost reasonable then you turn into a toad again the very next post. I can see how somebody could get fooled into getting back in the ring with you. Personally, I'm starting to like you.:thumbsup:

 

[buckshot24]

Funny that you ask if I'm a child since generally it's children that so easily believe in fairy tales.

If you want fairy tales take a look at the Blind Watchmaker video posted above and start at the 17 minute mark.

 

[JD50]

If you want fairy tales take a look at the Blind Watchmaker video posted above and start at the 17 minute mark.

Why?

 

[sandorski]

Why?

I'm guessin: Warehouses full of fossils + verifiable processes + reliable predictability = Fairy Tales

Old Book = Universal Truth

Do the Math.....

 

[JD50]

I'm guessin: Warehouses full of fossils + verifiable processes + reliable predictability = Fairy Tales

Old Book = Universal Truth

Do the Math.....

I'm betting God of the Gaps.

"I can't explain something, therefore god."

 

[buckshot24]

Right. Jumping to the supernatural conclusion is the God of the Gaps argument, which has already been destroyed.

The point is that you're never going to accept the supernatural conclusion because you're presuppositionally against it. A man could grow a new arm right in front of you and you'd be like "god of the gaps" "god of the gaps" we don't know how that happened but we're working on it.

 

[buckshot24]

I'm guessin: Warehouses full of fossils + verifiable processes + reliable predictability = Fairy Tales

Did you watch the video section I mentioned.

http://youtu.be/Ok_tcAEbHHw?t=17m1s

 

[sandorski]

Did you watch the video section I mentioned.

http://youtu.be/Ok_tcAEbHHw?t=17m1s

Care to be specific as to your point. aka, what exactly are you having a problem with?

 

[buckshot24]

Care to be specific as to your point. aka, what exactly are you having a problem with?

LOL I'm not having a problem with anything.

 

[sandorski]

The point is that you're never going to accept the supernatural conclusion because you're presuppositionally against it. A man could grow a new arm right in front of you and you'd be like "god of the gaps" "god of the gaps" we don't know how that happened but we're working on it.

No, we are presuppositionally against BS. Thing is, so are you, except on this one issue(I assume just this one).

 

[sandorski]

LOL I'm not having a problem with anything.

umm, so why the link? You had a reason for that link, what was it?

 

[buckshot24]

No, we are presuppositionally against BS. Thing is, so are you, except on this one issue(I assume just this one).

Is there corn in that BS?:wub::wub:😛

Calling it BS doesn't mean you've contradicted what I wrote.

 

[buckshot24]

umm, so why the link? You had a reason for that link, what was it?

You're not this dumb. Watch the link and figure it out.

 

[sandorski]

You're not this dumb. Watch the link and figure it out.

I'm getting tired of your BS run a rounds. If you can't/won't answer that simple question, you'll go on my Ignore list.

 

[buckshot24]

I'm getting tired of your BS run a rounds. If you can't/won't answer that simple question, you'll go on my Ignore list.

I said to watch that video at that point in time so you can watch Dawkins tell a fairy tale about the eye.

"If you want fairy tales take a look at the Blind Watchmaker video posted above and start at the 17 minute mark." Maybe you didn't see this?

 

[sandorski]

I said to watch that video at that point in time so you can watch Dawkins tell a fairy tale about the eye.

"If you want fairy tales take a look at the Blind Watchmaker video posted above and start at the 17 minute mark." Maybe you didn't see this?

...but he's not telling a fairy tale. There is tons of evidence showing what he is saying.

 

[buckshot24]

...but he's not telling a fairy tale. There is tons of evidence showing what he is saying.

Right, right. Tons of evidence about the sensors secreting mucus creating a rudimentary lens. Tons of evidence for that.

 

[sandorski]

Right, right. Tons of evidence about the sensors secreting mucus creating a rudimentary lens. Tons of evidence for that.

Do you think there is only 1 eye in existence? You do realize there are thousands of variations in different stages? There are eyes/sensors, existing right now which work similarly.

 

[buckshot24]

Do you think there is only 1 eye in existence? You do realize there are thousands of variations in different stages? There are eyes/sensors, existing right now which work similarly.

He tells a story about secretion of mucus creating a rudimentary lens. Look if you like this story who am I to argue with you? To me, its a fairy tale.

Note, he isn't talking about extant eyes he's talking about a fictional eye that lived happily ever after.

 

[sandorski]

He tells a story about secretion of mucus creating a rudimentary lens. Look if you like this story who am I to argue with you? To me, its a fairy tale.

Note, he isn't talking about extant eyes he's talking about a fictional eye that lived happily ever after.

There are eyes existing right now that work in a similar fashion. I'm sorry, this is no fairy tale.