• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

AT Official President Trump Rating Thread

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate Trump Presidency so far? (10 high, 1 low)

  • 1

    Votes: 89 67.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 12 9.2%
  • 3

    Votes: 6 4.6%
  • 4

    Votes: 4 3.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 3 2.3%
  • 6

    Votes: 2 1.5%
  • 7

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8

    Votes: 2 1.5%
  • 9

    Votes: 2 1.5%
  • 10

    Votes: 11 8.4%

  • Total voters
    131
Rasmussen is a totally Trump aligned polling farce, they dont even try to hide it. Almost as if Breitbart was running it!

Unlike the other news sources being linked here, they are totally unbiased?

Every site has a bias. You are kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
 
Huh? Your numbers perfectly support my point.

The poll in the OP has 70% of the votes at 1 of 10 stars. Trump is polling better than that in every single real-life poll you listed.

This forum is a useless left-wing echo chamber. Maybe it's fun circle-jerking each other, but you aren't actually having any intelligent discussions because you are stuck in the bigotry of "anything pro-Trump is bad!".

Are you a real person, or? .........
 
You said the vast majority is against Trump. I said too bad they didn't vote. You said they did, and that is why he lost the popular vote by 3 million.

So uh... if the "vast majority" is against Trump, and the "vast majority" did vote, then how the hell did the popular vote end up being so close?

Tip: you lied when you said "vast majority", it was more of a very slightly majority.

I never said he lost the popular vote by vast majority, read more carefully you'll do better in college.
 
Unlike the other news sources being linked here, they are totally unbiased?

Every site has a bias. You are kidding yourself if you think otherwise.

Yet you choose your preferred bias as some avatar of the only truth.

Do you need help to change your pants, or what? These are very pedestrian, these arguments you are making.
 
Yet you choose your preferred bias as some avatar of the only truth.

Do you need help to change your pants, or what? These are very pedestrian, these arguments you are making.

What are you talking about? I repeat: every single poll, even from the biased left-wing sources, has Trump doing better than this ATPN's poll has him at.

This forum is incredibly tilted. Go ahead, tell yourself it is because you are so super smart, you know deep down that isn't it.
 
You said the vast majority is against Trump. I said too bad they didn't vote. You said they did, and that is why he lost the popular vote by 3 million.

So uh... if the "vast majority" is against Trump, and the "vast majority" did vote, then how the hell did the popular vote end up being so close?

Tip: you lied when you said "vast majority", it was more of a very slightly majority.

Link and bold quote where I said vast majority voted against Trump. Can't find it? Aw don't worry kiddo, many have tried and failed to nut up.

Also, historically there is no such thing as a 3M popular vote loss being considered "so close" for a winner of the presidential election, as it is factually the worst popular vote loss in history for an electoral college winner and nearly 11M vote loss when factoring in total electorate. 11M votes is not close by any modern definition. Btw, facts as they still stand now:

Fact; ATPN disapproves of Trump just like the rest of the country and it's not even close.

Fact; rural white America's approval of Trump is way out of step with the vast majority of the country.

1487938973_survey6.png
 
Last edited:
You said the vast majority is against Trump. I said too bad they didn't vote. You said they did, and that is why he lost the popular vote by 3 million.

So uh... if the "vast majority" is against Trump, and the "vast majority" did vote, then how the hell did the popular vote end up being so close?

Tip: you lied when you said "vast majority", it was more of a very slightly majority.
Total votes cast: 136,628,459
Votes for Trump: 62,979,636
Other votes: 73,648,823
Difference: 10,669,187, or "more than the entire combined population of the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, D.C., Vermont, and Wyoming".
 
What are you talking about? I repeat: every single poll, even from the biased left-wing sources, has Trump doing better than this ATPN's poll has him at.

This forum is incredibly tilted. Go ahead, tell yourself it is because you are so super smart, you know deep down that isn't it.

lol, no wonder you're so confused. ATPN isn't running a rigorous scientific poll, kiddo. Don't conflate Internet polls with scientific ones, ya dope. With a little research it's not hard to see the demographics of ATPN would line up against Trump across the rest of the country as well, that's just how the urban, educated, young, minority, etc. vote.
 
Unlike the other news sources being linked here, they are totally unbiased?

Every site has a bias. You are kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
For news sources to be credible, they must at least try to hide their biases or even make a feeble attempt to appear objective. No such thing from Breitbart or Rasmussen, everything Trump related they report is a skewed one-way street... like 1930s Der Sturmer days.
 
Total votes cast: 136,628,459
Votes for Trump: 62,979,636
Other votes: 73,648,823
Difference: 10,669,187, or "more than the entire combined population of the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, D.C., Vermont, and Wyoming".

Beat me to it. Indeed, nearly 11M is substantial, especially in a modern, polarized electorate.
 
Total votes cast: 136,628,459
Votes for Trump: 62,979,636
Other votes: 73,648,823
Difference: 10,669,187, or "more than the entire combined population of the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, D.C., Vermont, and Wyoming".


  • Vast majority - means almost all or something like 90% or more, but less than unanimous.
  • Overwhelming majority - means well beyond any hope of finding enough who are swayable to take the opposite case or something like 75% or more
  • Large majority - means an unquestionable number such that there's no point in demanding a recount or something like 60%
  • Small majority - means a comfortable margin, but not enough to take for granted or something like 53%
  • Bare majority - means you just barely cracked 50.1% and if this were an election and your opponent demanded a recount, you are probably toast, or 50.1% or more
 
lol, no wonder you're so confused. ATPN isn't running a rigorous scientific poll, kiddo. Don't conflate Internet polls with scientific ones, ya dope. With a little research it's not hard to see the demographics of ATPN would line up against Trump across the rest of the country as well, that's just how the urban, educated, young, minority, etc. vote.

For Trump subreddit drones, they actually do believe random thrown together stuff on the internet does qualify as scientific fact. Just a random thrown together JPG constitutes evidence of a vast conspiracy. This is the sort of crazy you are up against when dealing with a radical Trump fanatic.
 
lol, no wonder you're so confused. ATPN isn't running a rigorous scientific poll, kiddo. Don't conflate Internet polls with scientific ones, ya dope. With a little research it's not hard to see the demographics of ATPN would line up against Trump across the rest of the country as well, that's just how the urban, educated, young, minority, etc. vote.
Oh yeah. This thread's poll is wildly unscientific. It is only a representation of ATPN and literally nothing else.
 
Link and bold quote where I said vast majority voted against Trump.


Fact; rural white America's approval of Trump is way out of step with the vast majority of the country.

Heh, too bad that apparent "vast majority" was too stupid or too lazy to get out and vote.

They voted, Trump was killed by like 3M votes, saved by antiquated electoral college specifically set up to restrain the will of majority rule.


Here is where you backpedal and claim that the "vast majority" you spoke of wasn't actually against Trump after-all. Which of course makes your whole train of conversation rather brain-dead, but I can see you making that claim just to scramble and avoid being caught in a lie.
 
  • Vast majority - means almost all or something like 90% or more, but less than unanimous.
  • Overwhelming majority - means well beyond any hope of finding enough who are swayable to take the opposite case or something like 75% or more
  • Large majority - means an unquestionable number such that there's no point in demanding a recount or something like 60%
  • Small majority - means a comfortable margin, but not enough to take for granted or something like 53%
  • Bare majority - means you just barely cracked 50.1% and if this were an election and your opponent demanded a recount, you are probably toast, or 50.1% or more
Well, here's the fun part:
Link and bold quote where I said vast majority voted against Trump. Can't find it? Aw don't worry kiddo, many have tried and failed to nut up.
Waiting for this to happen... thing is, it's not going to happen, because he didn't say that.
 
Here is where you backpedal and claim that the "vast majority" you spoke of wasn't actually against Trump after-all. Which of course makes your whole train of conversation rather brain-dead, but I can see you making that claim just to scramble and avoid being caught in a lie.
LOL, you're quite a piece of work.
 
"Fact; rural white America's approval of Trump is way out of step with the vast majority of the country."

Now, with the implied backpedaling, this what he was saying:

Fact; rural white America's approval of Trump is way out of step with the vast majority of the country, which was also pro-Trump enough to get him elected.

Does that make any sense? The mind of an anti-Trump bigot folks.
 
Those are %'s, not total nominal numbers, so the number of people don't skew the numbers.
you don't really get numbers, do you?

There could be 50 people in the "rural" category, and 5000 in the "urban" category.

There is no indication from that chart that the denominators of the percentages are equal, and in fact it is extraordinarily likely that they are heavily lopsided towards having more people in the urban category.
 
Back
Top