Hi all,
Seeing as this seems to be the most knowledgeable community I can find re: the 4core series of boards (possibly tied with PCTreiber, but being in English natively is a huge plus

) and that all of my searching hasn't been able to answer my main question with this board, I thought I would register here and see if anyone has any input on the matter.
I recently received a 4Coredual-SATA2 R2.0 and a C2Q Q9550 (E0). Per the CPU support list on ASRock's page (
http://www.asrock.com/mb/cpu.asp?Model=4CoreDual-SATA2%20R2.0), the Core 2 Quad Q9550 is supported in all 3 revisions, with only the single caveat that the "FSB may be reduced 5%." My problem is that since installing the CPU, it will not run above a 266 MHz bus speed, with a capped 8.5 multiplier (it can be reduced in the BIOS, but not increased), resulting in a CPU speed of 2.26 GHz rather than its potential 2.83 GHz stock speed or the "advertised" 95% speed of 2.69GHz.
I have contacted ASRock about 4 days ago and have yet to receive a reply, and cannot find any posts dealing directly with this supposedly "supported" processor on any forums I have checked. The closest I have seen are discussions on 8400's that people have tried, that again ran into the same problem of the FSB not being capable of anything near the CPU's potential (though I thought that this problem might be somehow addressed in the BIOS or at the hardware level for the "supported" models).
Other info:
BIOS revision 2.20 (Official, pre-installed on the motherboard before purchase)
Corsair TWIN2x4096-6400C5C memory kit running at 667 MHz, CAS 5
Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro 512 MB AGP
Enermax NoiseTaker II 485W PSU
Northbridge is reported as a PT880 Pro (rather than Ultra) by CPU-Z
I have no idea which Clock Generator I have (not reported by Sandra, and I am not in the mood to tear the computer apart again just yet to get at it after finally getting everything running - the RAM was finnicky.

) [*Edit* After a bit more searching and playing with SetFSB, it would appear I have an ICS953002DFLF, which according to threads such as
http://www.pctreiber.net/forum/inte...dualvsta_overclockingtipps_tweaks_8602.0.html is apparently really, REALLY bad news, if I have to resort to oc'ing the fsb.

Edit 2: SetFSB reads accurate information using that ICS code, but apparently does not write to it... So I suppose I actually may have yet another undiscovered part #... ARGH!]
Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated.
P.S. On a side note, Sandra also reports that my CPU is only rated up to 1.188 volts, and that it is being run over-volted at 1.28 volts. Should I be at all concerned?