oh, thanks for the heads up. I was just getting ready to buy you one too...Originally posted by: cain
i dont like flashy looking cases
Originally posted by: mdetz
wonder if this would be a good replacement case for the emachines d3024 OD deal. I think that is an matx board. you get a dvd burner, mobo/cpu (nforce 2/sempron 3000), 256 ram, 300 watt p/s, xp home, microsoft works for ~236.
Originally posted by: RobsTV
Originally posted by: cain
i dont like flashy looking cases
Non-Flashy similar version
Originally posted by: user1234
Originally posted by: RobsTV
Originally posted by: cain
i dont like flashy looking cases
Non-Flashy similar version
but only 300W PSU and it costs more b/c of shipping charges, plus tax in CA :thumbsdown:
Originally posted by: MarlboroJones
RobsTV:
Thanks for the info - good stuff.
User1234:
If possible, please post your thoughts on this when you do get it. Thanks.
I unfortunately had to pop out to take care of some business. When I got back, free shipping was gone. Yes, I am an incredible idiot, but may still get this anyway. I do so like it.
Originally posted by: RobsTV
Don't sweat too much over CPU needs.
As long as you have a PC that can do at least 4000 in 3dmarks 2003, you can run any of todays games at max settings, or near max settings.
Laptop with P-M 1.8Ghz runs HL2 1440x900x32 max settings at 45fps.
FarCry is even better.
It scores about 4100 with ATi mr9700 in 3dm2k3.
In comparison, Desktop with AMD mobile XP2400 and 9700 Pro scores 5400 in 3dm2k3.
Needless to say, it smokes all of todays games just fine.
Next years games?
NF2 motherboard for about $60, combined with $70 CPU is all it takes.
And if you really want something unbeatable for gaming, pick up an NF2 board with Soundstorm (MCP-T or MCP-D), and you will have one of the only motherboards that can fully game using SPDIF DD 5.1!!! Can't do that with any other platform yet.
Originally posted by: WorldTraveller
RobsTV or anyone else with an opinion, I am interested in getting an NF2 board with socketA MB (gasp!) - actually I may steal an XP 2400+ from my current setup. But, I can't seem to find any reviews on such MBs! I want to stay with well known manufacturers like MSI, Asus, Shuttle, etc. Any specific recommendations? Links to reviews would be even more appreciated. mATX roundup review would be awesome - too greedy?
While OC'ing options would always be nice, this board WILL NOT be used for games. It will be probably be used as music storage & as a second machine. So built in sound & video would be nice so as to keep costs down.
Originally posted by: RobsTV
Originally posted by: WorldTraveller
RobsTV or anyone else with an opinion, I am interested in getting an NF2 board with socketA MB (gasp!) - actually I may steal an XP 2400+ from my current setup. But, I can't seem to find any reviews on such MBs! I want to stay with well known manufacturers like MSI, Asus, Shuttle, etc. Any specific recommendations? Links to reviews would be even more appreciated. mATX roundup review would be awesome - too greedy?
While OC'ing options would always be nice, this board WILL NOT be used for games. It will be probably be used as music storage & as a second machine. So built in sound & video would be nice so as to keep costs down.
I've used these for low budget LAN gaming, and they work fine.
Even onboard GF4 MX440 and 1800 Duron is enough for Nascar Racing 2003.
Since gaming will not be it's purpose, it will do fine.
SATA, Raid, SPDIF (although no Soundstorm for gamers)
http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion/Fee...tRatingReview.asp?Item=N82E16813130488
For soundstorm, try to find Shuttle MN31/N.
Anand just did a CPU comparison yesterday, and although he did not recommend using Socket A for new systems, he did show these facts:
Barton Athlon XP/Sempron 512K 130nm (same as Mobile XP, but mobile runs lower voltage so much cooler, and much better overclocker).
Newcastle Athlon 64 512K 130nm
Paris Sempron 256K 130nm
Also from the article was this in part
"Performance of a 2.4 GHz Barton core is roughly equal to that of the Athlon 64 3000+ "
My opinion on gaming is from experience using these. Others have a right to "think" differently. It's all good.
Don't take the word of a socket A user. Take a look yourself at madonion.
Go to 3dm2003, and select 9800 Pro, then compare all A64's to the XP's.
This is not a battle about which is better.
It is simply a point that as long as you score 4000+ in 3dm2k3, your system will play modern games fine.
Both will score 6000+ when used with 9800 Pro. (5400 here using 9700 Pro)
Originally posted by: user1234
I actually have experience with socket A, and a positive one at that. Last year I built a socket A system for my brother, it was a Shuttle AN35N-Ultra board with a Athlon XP Mobile 2500+ (overclocked to 2.5 GHz) a 9700 pro (got it used from ebay for $125). That was a great budget gaming rig (housed in Antec Super Lanboy case) but I still think that a modern 939 or 754 system is a better bet for a gaming rig, and is worth the small additional cost. Especially the video card, a 6600GT will be much faster than a 9700p/9800p. But for non-gaming machine, you could indeed go with a socket A system, and first rule of thumb is to ONLY CONSIDER NFORCE2 based motherboard, as this chipset is DA BOMB for socket A and has much better performance than the competing VIA/SIS chipsets. One of best mATX boards is the Biostar M7NCG 400, which I also used in another HTPC/server machine I built, and can recommend it. It has decent integrated graphics (geforce) and nice overclocking capabilities.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813138234
