Jaydip
Diamond Member
- Mar 29, 2010
- 3,691
- 21
- 81
Objective is the key word. Let me know when we have a test done that is objective, but measuring something and then trying to attribute an effect to it that nobody who uses the hardware ever sees, isn't objective. It's finding a measurement that nVidia beats AMD in and trying to make it appear that the fact AMD cards are faster and better value is irrelevant because of this one statistic. Until we have a double blind comparison that identifies there is a problem, we have absolutely nothing to base these conclusions on.
Back in the day (mid 80's) I was involved in double blind comparisons of Audio equipment. Until you've done something like that you can't understand how biased we all really are. You need to recreate the natural environment. An investigative environment often adds stress to the subject and interferes with one's ability to sense (hear, see, taste) differences. It's really not as simple as A/B comparisons.
I don't remember anyone saying that.So far all we have is subjective findings from [H] and not very accurate findings from TR.That is why we need to find out the true picture.As I said previously my brother who uses 7950 DC II never told me about MS at all.But it is subjective and that is why we need to find an objective solution to it.
