Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
We invaded and occupied those countries? Hmm...news to me.Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Gee, I thought liberals supported the troops . . . ?
Psst . . . how about Haiti, Kosovo, Somalia? Ring a bell?
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Gee, I thought liberals supported the troops . . . ?
Psst . . . how about Haiti, Kosovo, Somalia? Ring a bell?
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
That seems an uncalled for "low blow" remark.
Anyway, think recruiting might pickup when peeps are graduating this month?
I know enough of your writing to make the assumption your education is a bit sub-par. Either that or you're just about the most careless typist on earth.Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
please...im not even going to respond to that....you know nothing about me or my military backround...
Originally posted by: conjur
I know enough of your writing to make the assumption your education is a bit sub-par. Either that or you're just about the most careless typist on earth.Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
please...im not even going to respond to that....you know nothing about me or my military backround...
Possible. I'm sure the recruiters are under increasing pressure to get more people signed up. My daughter's boyfriend signed up for the National Guard Reserves a month or so ago. He was promised he would never have to go overseas.Originally posted by: Fern
That seems an uncalled for "low blow" remark.Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Anyway, think recruiting might pickup when peeps are graduating this month?
I hope so. 😉Originally posted by: Deptacon
its the 2nd one.... 🙂
Originally posted by: conjur
Possible. I'm sure the recruiters are under increasing pressure to get more people signed up. My daughter's boyfriend signed up for the National Guard Reserves a month or so ago. He was promised he would never have to go overseas.Originally posted by: Fern
That seems an uncalled for "low blow" remark.Originally posted by: conjur
You appear to be a prime example of the lowered standards the recruiters are using these days.
BTW, how many countries were we invading and occupying under Clinton?
Anyway, think recruiting might pickup when peeps are graduating this month?
Hmmm...
Originally posted by: Deptacon
hahaha surrre...... it is possible to secure a statside AGR job in the reserves.....and if your unit your stationed in is a stateside statinoary unit it wont be deployed, so it IIISSSSS possbile but i doubt it..... people just need to use sense when talking to a recruiter
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Deptacon
hahaha surrre...... it is possible to secure a statside AGR job in the reserves.....and if your unit your stationed in is a stateside statinoary unit it wont be deployed, so it IIISSSSS possbile but i doubt it..... people just need to use sense when talking to a recruiter
But it seems that people aren't talking to recruiters. 😉
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: Deptacon
hahaha surrre...... it is possible to secure a statside AGR job in the reserves.....and if your unit your stationed in is a stateside statinoary unit it wont be deployed, so it IIISSSSS possbile but i doubt it..... people just need to use sense when talking to a recruiter
But it seems that people aren't talking to recruiters. 😉
like i said, it goes up and down, i wouldnt worry about it
Originally posted by: dannybin1742
So all in all it's not surprising that it's becoming more difficult to find people to recruit as the economy improves
pffft improving, try stagnant
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: dannybin1742
So all in all it's not surprising that it's becoming more difficult to find people to recruit as the economy improves
pffft improving, try stagnant
LOL, I saw that on TV last night. I guess the low recuritment numbers have nothing to do with people not wanting to be shot at. Go figure.
Originally posted by: BBond
How about this. I only want to be in the military when there isn't a madman in the White House inventing reasons to go to war.
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: BBond
How about this. I only want to be in the military when there isn't a madman in the White House inventing reasons to go to war.
i woulndt have join under clinton then..... you dont join for a the leader or to serve a pres, you join serving the coutry and follow your orders...... you keep it simple, yeah il larugue stuff in here, but when im in that world, i dont even think about it, i just go with it....it makes it really hard to do if you think about it...
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: BBond
How about this. I only want to be in the military when there isn't a madman in the White House inventing reasons to go to war.
i woulndt have join under clinton then..... you dont join for a the leader or to serve a pres, you join serving the coutry and follow your orders...... you keep it simple, yeah il larugue stuff in here, but when im in that world, i dont even think about it, i just go with it....it makes it really hard to do if you think about it...
I think most people join the military because
a. Money
b. Their parents served and they were pressured to join
I doubt you'll find many people joining to defend the country.
Originally posted by: X-Man
Military benefits are in general pretty good but their pay is so low that some military families have to go on food stamps.
My buddy Mike was a sergeant in the 101st Airborne. He got a medical discharge because he was undeployable (sleep apnia) and easily found a job in the private sector making double his previous salary. Pretty insane that we pay people twice as much to fix air conditioners as we do to protect our nation.
So all in all it's not surprising that it's becoming more difficult to find people to recruit as the economy improves. Hell, Wal-Mart pays more than the Army does! 😉
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
I doubt you'll find many people joining to defend the country.Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: BBond