Not being well versed in types of guns tell me why one would need 6 AR-15s with magazines capable of holding 50 rounds of ammo for self defense.Liberals made guns political by falling into the trap of looking and acting like they are trying to ban peoples' right to self defense.
That's hilarious, and sadly true since Columbine.
The anti-gun guys should really try to understand that's also the sentiment of the self defense crowd. When it matters, there is no one else to save yourself but you.
California makes sure that innocent bystanders can never get involved. How many millions of guns do you think are owned in California? But it is almost impossible to get a permit to carry. Then there are safe storage laws and rules about gun locks and separating guns from ammunition.
Guns can be used to kill people and they can be used to stop people in the act of murder. Liberal states pass laws that try to insure that outside the home only those intending murder will be carrying. “Guns are evil and I won’t be the one who dies for lack of defense so who cares. Fuck the gun nuts.”
But I can’t believe there is a single person who fancies him or herself rational in opposition to the second amendment who would not go back in time and put a gun in their hand to save a loved one who was a murdered with a gun and shoot the murderer first.
Yes truly, we need more guns. 400M isn't enough.
I don't want to live in a society where you must be armed to the teeth everywhere you go in order to feel reasonably safe. That's not a civilized society.
If I had to choose between arming loved ones or passing policies that make it so I don't have to arm loved ones, I'd choose the latter 100% of the time.
We don't need MORE guns. We just need to allow people the ability to have them in vulnerable places. We have 400M guns. It is what it is. Yet in many cases we don't allow teachers the ability to receive training and be armed if they choose.
When the shootings happen, we call people who have guns (cops). We have already decided that guns is the solution. Why force the teachers to be human shields instead of protectors?
You’d expect intelligent people would see what is happening and be willing to give up their guns. Nope selfish people MUH RIGHTS! MUH FREEDUMS!!!What policy would you pass to get rid of the couple hundred million guns in America?
Right, you expect people who have their guns locked up and not being used to murder people to decide to give up their guns that are locked up and not being used to murder people.You’d expect intelligent people would see what is happening and be willing to give up their guns. Nope selfish people MUH RIGHTS! MUH FREEDUMS!!!
How many of them do you suppose also have armed bodyguards? How many politicians have taxpayer police protection?What kills me is all these celebrities who want to outlaw guns but play in all the shoot-em-up actions movies with hundreds of people being killed...
You can't get rid of all of them, but voluntary gun buybacks are usually wildly successful.What policy would you pass to get rid of the couple hundred million guns in America?
Look, I am not what I would call well versed on types of guns. It was only in the last few months I started to get interested in them. I haven’t shot one in decades. But I go through phases of learning about different things. However, I have learned a few things pertinent to your question in reflecting of what I wanted to buy:Not being well versed in types of guns tell me why one would need 6 AR-15s with magazines capable of holding 50 rounds of ammo for self defense.
You could defend yourself with a tank too, but seems impractical to me. In both cases these arms sound offensive where a handgun with a 6 round mag seems far more practical for defense.
We have too many guns you sick fuckWe don't need MORE guns. We just need to allow people the ability to have them in vulnerable places. We have 400M guns. It is what it is. Yet in many cases we don't allow teachers the ability to receive training and be armed if they choose.
When the shootings happen, we call people who have guns (cops). We have already decided that guns is the solution. Why force the teachers to be human shields instead of protectors?
Has the NRA proposed vending machines yet?All we need to do is put a freely accessible gun on every trash can, entrance, exit, bathroom, vending machine, AED, fire alarm, and fire extinguisher, and we'll finally be safe.
/s but if you needed the /s to be aware that it was sarcasm, what the ever-loving fuck is wrong with you?
Rubber band sling shots, kids only need rocks as ammo against shooter. One sling shot won't do anything, but 31 together? /sAnd this applies to children being butchered in a school how exactly? Have we moved past teachers and now need to arm the actual kids?
The anti-gun guys aren't the ones with a comprehension issue here. It is not unreasonable to expect law enforcement to do their fucking jobs when they are on location. They understood the danger because some of them attempted to rescue their own children.
So no, let's focus on the dysfunction of cowards and hypocrites who through dereliction of duty allowed so much death. People outraged over small children being executed at school understand things just fine. That whole department should be fired with extreme prejudice, and I'd like to start seeing LEOs held accountable for this kind of cowardice.
Probably would never happen, because of fire safety and the risk of an explosion in the incident of a fire.Has the NRA proposed vending machines yet?
We don't need MORE guns. We just need to allow people the ability to have them in vulnerable places. We have 400M guns. It is what it is. Yet in many cases we don't allow teachers the ability to receive training and be armed if they choose.
When the shootings happen, we call people who have guns (cops). We have already decided that guns is the solution. Why force the teachers to be human shields instead of protectors?
If the parents had been armed, they could've charged in and stopped the shooter! /sHow do you reconcile this position with the absurd inaction of the police in Uvalde?
If the parents had been armed, they could've charged in and stopped the shooter! /s
A sling was good enough for David to fell Goliath, if God wanted the children to survive, they'd be able to make the shot.Rubber band sling shots, kids only need rocks as ammo against shooter. One sling shot won't do anything, but 31 together? /s
How do you reconcile this position with the absurd inaction of the police in Uvalde?
The cops (if not crime-ridden area) and SROs sign up thinking it'll never happen. Well, it happened, but they don't feel like they signed up for that. I think a teacher wanting access to a gun is probably more likely to defend. I've seen more heroics from unarmed teachers and students.
The cops (if not crime-ridden area) and SROs sign up thinking it'll never happen. Well, it happened, but they don't feel like they signed up for that. I think a teacher wanting access to a gun is probably more likely to defend. I've seen more heroics from unarmed teachers and students.