He talks about Geekbench5 score in MT which is true:
MT score is not fully comparable because A13 is only 2 big core + 4 little core and Intels are 4 big cores + SMT.
You would need to compare with 4 big core A12X from
iPad Pro GB5 score. And bang, an old
A12X has MT score of 4607 and outperforming any 4-core x86 laptop chip by huge margin (while running at just 2.5 GHz).
If we isolate just single core performance than results are very different and suddenly Apple A13 is outperforming Intel by large number:
And Apple A13 is running within 5W TDP, A12X 7W TDP...….. in compare to Intel laptops with 15W TDP and ST core running over 4 GHz (and still loosing in every way).
There is no point to answer some others - haters never write numbers and facts.
EDIT: Added Cortex A77 in new Snapdragon into comparison. It's 4+4 big.LITTLE and is on par with 4-core x86 Intels in MT load (with much lower power consumption). ST load is lower due to max clock at 2.8 GHz. IMHO biggest danger for Intel and AMD will come from generic Cortex cores such as this A77 or new A78. Don't forget that A77 has slightly higher IPC/PPC than Zen2 (+8% according to SPECint2006). This is huge milestone for generic Cortex core having higher IPC/PPC for the first time in history. Also very interesting from uarch point of view - A77 has 4xALU + 2xjump units, this half way to Apple's 6xALU design when Apple's core uses 4xALU + 2x simpleALU/jump units (and clearly wider than x86 stuck at 4xALU for decade). I can speculate that A78 might upgrade those 2xjump units into 2x simpleALU/jump in Apple style (seems logical and evolutional step to me but who knows). When every cheap Raspberry PI will have A78 with IPC/PPC higher than Ice Lake and Zen3, this is the biggest threat for x86 laptops and desktops. Apple is great technological demonstrator for future ARM Cortex cores though.