Are you registered to vote?

[Kadarin]

I am registered to vote, and I do vote. (I voted against the current administration.)

However, Diebold is trying very hard to make sure all of our votes don't matter.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
I am registered to vote, and I do vote. (I voted against the current administration.)

However, Diebold is trying very hard to make sure all of our votes don't matter.

Diebold is beating a dead horse. The EC made sure of that

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
... what does that have to do with local races or a mayoral election?

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Federal is just a crock of crap.

1 + 1 = 2, Drew.

You should have quoted my post, instead of his, then.

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
However, Diebold is trying very hard to make sure all of our votes don't matter.

I disagree, but that's a conversation for P&N.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
... what does that have to do with local races or a mayoral election?

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Federal is just a crock of crap.

1 + 1 = 2, Drew.

You should have quoted my post, instead of his, then.

Sorry, didn't realize that the intended quote being the second in the list of quotes would make my post impossible to understand.

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
... what does that have to do with local races or a mayoral election?

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
Federal is just a crock of crap.

1 + 1 = 2, Drew.

You should have quoted my post, instead of his, then.

Sorry, didn't realize that the intended quote being the second in the list of quotes would make my post impossible to understand.

It didn't make it impossible. It doesn't, however, make any sense to quote a post that you're not directly responding to.

 

[archiloco]

need to have a voice...so yes registered to vote

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
It didn't make it impossible. It doesn't, however, make any sense to quote a post that you're not directly responding to.

I figured people were smart enough to figure it out. I guess I give the human race too much credit?

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
It didn't make it impossible. It doesn't, however, make any sense to quote a post that you're not directly responding to.

I figured people were smart enough to figure it out. I guess I give the human race too much credit?

<shrug> I found it easy to "figure out". I just disagree with your quoting method.

 

[Dissipate]

Originally posted by: bradruth

Originally posted by: Dissipate
This book has a pretty good roadmap.

In a nutshell, privatize everything.

So would you say you're ok with anarchy?

I call it anarcho-capitalism.

I am a paleolibertarian.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
It didn't make it impossible. It doesn't, however, make any sense to quote a post that you're not directly responding to.

I figured people were smart enough to figure it out. I guess I give the human race too much credit?

<shrug> I found it easy to "figure out". I just disagree with your quoting method.

Oh yeah? Whatcha gonna do about it there tough guy??

*shadow boxes with his monitor*

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: GeekDrew
It didn't make it impossible. It doesn't, however, make any sense to quote a post that you're not directly responding to.

I figured people were smart enough to figure it out. I guess I give the human race too much credit?

<shrug> I found it easy to "figure out". I just disagree with your quoting method.

Oh yeah? Whatcha gonna do about it there tough guy??

*shadow boxes with his monitor*

hahahaha

 

[bradruth]

Originally posted by: Dissipate

Originally posted by: bradruth

Originally posted by: Dissipate
This book has a pretty good roadmap.

In a nutshell, privatize everything.

So would you say you're ok with anarchy?

I call it anarcho-capitalism.

I am a paleolibertarian.

That's almost as dangerous as authoritarian socialism, which could be the end result of a monopoly under your system.

 

[Jikininki]

yes..i'm registered.

never gone to vote. Was gonna vote in the last presidential election but due to my work schedule at the time, i couldn't get out to the polls. Maybe next time.

 

[GeekDrew]

Originally posted by: Jikininki
yes..i'm registered.

never gone to vote. Was gonna vote in the last presidential election but due to my work schedule at the time, i couldn't get out to the polls. Maybe next time.

Vote absentee

 

[Dissipate]

Originally posted by: bradruth

Originally posted by: Dissipate

Originally posted by: bradruth

Originally posted by: Dissipate
This book has a pretty good roadmap.

In a nutshell, privatize everything.

So would you say you're ok with anarchy?

I call it anarcho-capitalism.

I am a paleolibertarian.

That's almost as dangerous as authoritarian socialism, which could be the end result of a monopoly under your system.

There has never been a monopoly in the free market.

Monopoly is synonymous with government.

 

[Bassyhead]

yes

 

[bradruth]

Originally posted by: Dissipate
There has never been a monopoly in the free market.

Monopoly is synonymous with government.

The free market wouldn't be able to indefinitely sustain itself. At some point someone somewhere would get an advantage and would be capable of destroying the competition and seizing power.




...if organized crime hadn't already seized a firm grip on the lawless society.