Seeing as you are a fellow i5 2500k owner, is the 2500k going to be a bottleneck to this card?It's nice to reminisce, but those were the days of cheap and frequent node changes. Also, the introduction of unified shaders was, much like Ron Burgundy, "sort of a big deal."
The economic reality suggests that selling chips sized at or north of 300mm2 (at least early in the process cycle) at the margins that the stockholders of these companies demand requires retail prices north of $300. The speculation around Polaris 10 supports this -- 230mm2 chip for $300 or less.
I think the 1070 pricing foreshadows the performance and pricing of Polaris 10 . Assuming Nvidia has a general idea where Polaris 10 is going to wind up (seems pretty likely to me), the pricing of the 1070 indicates that Polaris 10 will not compete in 1070's performance range, but it will be close enough that Nvidia has to price the 1070 ($380) much lower than 1080.
TL-DR - This s**t is more expensive to make than it was in 2006.
That being said, unless the 1070 really sucks, I'll probably get one to replace my 970. I always want to get the x80, but I can never justify the ridiculous price premium.
I have the same ram as you also, 8gb corsair vengeance. I was thinking of getting a 1070, and upgrading my SSD from a crucial M4 to an 850 Pro, maybe adding another 8GB of RAM. Worth it?
I'm also due for a monitor upgrade from my 24"ultrasharp 2405FPw to really justify upgrading my card.
Last edited:
