Ed
It's actually bad for society if the GPU makers get away with price segmentation better. It means that they get more money, which we either pay directly or by having companies that use the GPUs increase their prices.
Edited for spelling errors.
What are you trying to say? That a small startup selling AI servers using consumer GPUs that they have not even made a delivery on, trying to force a manufacturer to open up it's firmware for them, selling 6x GPUS that cost maybe 7500k for 15k is a good thing for regular consumers?
Or should the manufacturer of the consumer GPUs tell the startup company that if they want that kind of access they should be using the proper accelerator for their server boxes?
Because Tinybox sounds like they want to get access to gpu firmware that should not be open source. Now I am not talking the software to run the AI code, but the actual GPU FIRMWARE that would give access to memory interfaces and such.
And we ALL know they are trying this with AMD because Nvidia would tell them to pound sand. NO.
Let them goto Intel and threaten them.
This whole thing is a no win for us regular people that want to have a GPU in their personal computer.
This guy behind Tinybox should have been denied from the start. Lisa Su made a large mistake by even replying to this guy, which looks like a pyramid scheme to begin with.
So are you for using gaming class cards as AI accelerators or Professional class cards used as AI accelerators?